Title: A Study to Establish the Validity of Non-Fasting Lipid Profile against Fasting Lipid Profile for Making Treatment Decision in Diabetes Mellitus 2012-2014

Authors: Lokesh Gupta, Vipan Kumar Goyal, Amit Baweja

 DOI:  http://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v4i5.10

Abstract

As incidence of diabetes is continuously increasing in india and diabetic dyslipidemia is a leading cause of atherosclerotic disease process like coronary artery disease. If we diagnosed and treat dyslipidemia in early stage, we can decrese the risk of atherosclerotic diseases. But current guidelines recommend measurement of fasting lipid profile and majority of the patients present in the hospital are in nonfasting state so their lipid profile is deferred due to their nonfasting status which impedes their treatment. However, recent studies suggest nonfasting lipid profile may better or similarly predict cardiovascular disease events than fasting levels. So, if validate for treatment of diabetic dyslipidemia then measurement of nonfasting lipid profile may have many practical advantage for clinical practice. So a prospective study was carried out in 100 diabetic patients in 25-65 years age group including both sexes irrespective of community or background which were present in inpatient department of medicine, Mata Chanan Devi hospital, New Delhi, during the time period of 2012-2014. It is a 210 bedded, tertiary care hospital in west Delhi, where the patients travel from all north India. The patients with Coronary event (myocardial infarction, unstable angina) and procedures (coronary artery bypass, coronary angioplasty) in previous 4 weeks, ischemic stroke in prior 3 months, chronic alcoholic patients, patients having pancreatitis, hypothyroidism, pregnancy and patients on lipid lowering drugs in previous 3 months, were not included in the study. After taking written informed consent lipid profile was done from each subject at the time of admission and next day morning (after 8-12 hr fasting). Self reported time since last meal was also noted at the time of admission. LDL was measured by direct method. Non HDL cholesterol was calculated by total cholesterol – HDL cholesterol. SPSS (statistical package for social sciences) software version 16.0 was used for statistical analysis. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test done to compare the total mean fasting and nonfasting lipid profile. We divided the study subjects according to self reported time since last meal. Like 0-1 hour include patient taking meal before < 1 hour and 1-2 hour include <2 hour post meal and so on other groups. Comparison of fasting and non fasting lipid profile was done by Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test in all groups. All P values were 2-tailed. P value <0.05 is statistical significant.

Salient findings Out of 100 patients, there were 44 females and 56 males subjects. Minimum age is 32 years and maximum age is 65 years. Mean age in males is 56.12 ± 8.05 and in females 57.91 ± 7.13. Incidence of diabetes was higher in >50 years of age group and among males. 15 out of 100 diabetic subjects were on insulin therapy and rest 85 were on Oral hypoglycemic drugs only. Out of 100 diabetic patients 45 were hypertensive, 7 CAD, 9 CKD and 10 had history of CVA. Mean fasting blood sugar was 112.26mg/dl and mean post prandial blood sugar was 192.65mg/dl as patients were on treatment for diabetes. Mean HbA1c among females was 7.54 ± 1.39 and in males was 7.79 ± 1.48. The mean total cholesterol level in the 100 diabetic patients included in the study in the fasting state was 166.48± 45.30mg/dl, and in the non-fasting state it was 167.06 ± 46.03mg/dl, the p value was more than >0.05 thus making it statistically insignificant. The mean HDL level in the fasting state was38.93±13.72mg/dl, and in the non-fasting state it 38.67±13.30mg/dl, the p value is > 0.05, making it statistically insignificant. The mean direct LDL level in the fasting state was 86.41±34.90mg/dl and in the non-fasting state it was 86.35±38.38mg/dl, the p value again > 0.05, making it statistically insignificant. The mean triglyceride level in the fasting state was 184.82± 29.26 mg/dl and in the non-fasting state it was 205.87± 31.83 mg/dl, it is higher in the nonfasting group and the p value is <0.05, which is statistically significant. The mean non HDL level in the fasting state was 127.55±43.06 mg/dl and in the non-fasting state it was 128.38±43.21 mg/dl, the p value >0.05, making it statistically insignificant Comparison of nonfasting and fasting lipid profile according to time since last meal Post meal values of total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, direct LDL cholesterol, non HDL cholesterol and triglycerides correlate with their fasting values. There was no significant difference in fasting and nonfasting total cholesterol, HDL c, direct LDL c and non HDLc as a function of time since last meal. Triglycerides is significantly increased up to 6-7 hour after meal as p value is <0.05. Although it is higher in nonfasting even after 6-7 hours but statistically insignificant. The highest increased in levels of triglycerides were noted 3 to 5 hour after meal.

Conclusion- Difference between nonfasting and fasting values of total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, direct LDL cholesterol and non HDL cholesterol were statistically insignificant. Triglycerides values were significantly high in non-fasting state. Post meal level of all lipids and lipoproteins correlate with their fasting values in the different groups of time since last meal. Triglycerides were increase after meal and maximum increased from fasting was seen 3 to 5 hours after meal. Total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, direct LDL cholesterol and non HDL cholesterol differ insignificantly from their fasting values as a function of time since last meal. In our study level of lipids differed minimally in nonfasting. We measured direct LDL which differed insignificantly from fasting direct LDL. Calculated LDL can underestimate after meal as elevated triglycerides in Friedewald formula (LDLc = TC – HDLc – TG/5). In our study higher nonfasting than fasting triglycerides were likely attributable directly to fat intake. And recent studies suggest nonfasting or postprandial hypertriglyceridemia is a significant risk factor for atherosclerosis. From above findings we conclude that nonfasting blood draws may be highly effective and practical for lipid profile testing in diabetic patients. Recommendations- Lipid profile can be done in nonfasting state in diabetics and it is more practical and more feasible as we spend our maximum time in nonfasting state. LDL should be done by direct method as in nonfasting state increased triglycerides can underestimate the calculated LDL by Friedewald formula. Non HDL cholesterol can be measured in nonfasting state. More recently this is studied for better predictor of cardiovascular risk than LDL because it includes all Apo-B containing atherogenic lipoproteins. Future research should focus on studies reducing the levels of nonfasting triglycerides and thus remnant lipoprotein cholesterol in an attempt to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease and death further than that currently obtained by reducing mainly LDL cholesterol levels. Furthermore the results also highlight the need for randomized double blind trials of new and established drugs to reduce nonfasting triglycerides and remnant lipoprotein cholesterol, with the ultimate aim of reducing risk of cardiovascular disease and early death.

References

    

1.      Libby P. The pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of atherosclerosis. In: Longo DL, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Jameson JL, Loscalzo J, editors. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. 18th Ed. Vol- 2. USA: McGraw-Hill 2012; Chapter 241: pp 1983-91.

2.      Powers AC. Diabetes Mellitus. In: Longo DL, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Jameson JL, Loscalzo J, editors. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. 18th Ed. Vol- 2. USA: McGraw-Hill 2012; Chapter 344: pp 2968-3009.

3.      Bae JH, Schwemmer M, Lee LK, Lee HJ, Park KR, Kim KY et al. Postprandial hypertriglyceridemia induced endothelial dysfunction in healthy subjects is independent of lipid oxidation. Int J Cardiol 2003; 87:259-67.

4.      Plotnick GD, Corretti MC, Vogel RA. Effect of antioxidant vitamins on the transient impairment of endothelium dependent brachial artery vasoactivity following a single high fat meal. Jam Med Assoc 1997; 278:1682-6.

5.      Kugiyama K, Doi H, Motoyama T. Association of remnant lipoprotein levels with impairment of endothelium dependent vasomotor function in human coronary arteries. Circulation 1998; 97:2519-26.

6.      Nordestgaard BG, Langsted A, Freiberg JJ. Nonfasting hyperlipidemia and cardiovascular disease. Curr Drug Targets 2009; 10:328-35.

7.      Kannel WB, Vasan RS. Triglycerides as vascular risk factors: new epidemiologic insights. Curr Opin Cardiol 2009; 24:345-50.

8.      Alsaran K, Sabry A, Shaheen N. Is non fasting non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol adequate for lipid management in Saudi hemodialysis patients? Jnrt 2009; 2:1-17.

9.      Lee SH, Lee BW, Won HK, Moon JH, Kim KJ, Kang ES et al. Postprandial triglyceride is associated with fasting triglyceride and HOMA-IR in Korean subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab J 2011; 35:404-10.

10.  Desmeules S, Arcand-Bossé JF, Bergeron J, Douville P, Agharazii M. Nonfasting non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol is adequate for lipid management in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2005; 45:1067-72

11.  Kimak E, Ksiazek A, Baranowicz-Gaszczyk I, Solski J. Disturbed lipids, lipoproteins and triglyceride-rich lipoproteins as well as fasting and nonfasting non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in post-renal transplant patients. Ren Fail 2007; 29:705-12.

12.  Mora S, Rifai N, Buring JE, Ridker PM. Fasting compared with nonfasting lipids and apolipoproteins for predicting incident cardiovascular events. Circulation 2008; 118:993-1001.

13.  Dungan KM, Guster T, Dewalt DA, Buse JB. A comparison of lipid and lipoprotein measurements in the fasting and nonfasting states in patients with type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin 2007; 23:2689-95

14.  Schaefer EJ, Audelin MC, Mcnamara JR, Shah PK, Tayler T, Daly JA et al. Comparison of fasting and postprandial plasma lipoproteins in subjects with and without coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88:1129-33.

15.  Craig SR, Amin RV, Russell DW, Paradise NF. Blood cholesterol screening influence of fasting state on cholesterol results and management decision. J Gen Intern Med 2000; 15:395-9.

16.  Langsted A,Freiberg JJ, Nordestgaard BG. Fasting and non fasting lipid levels: influence of normal food intake on lipids, lipoproteins, apolipoproteins, and cardiovascular risk prediction. Circulation 2008; 118:2047-56.

17.  Wilder LB, Bachorik PS, Finney CA, Moy TF, Becker DM. The effect of fasting status on the determination of low-density and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Am J Med 1995; 99:374-7.

18.  Sidhu D, Naugler C. Fasting time and lipid levels in a community-based population: a cross-sectional study. Arch Intern Med 2012; 172:1707-10.

19.  Steiner MJ, Skinner AC, Perrin EM. Fasting might not be necessary before lipid screening: a nationally representative cross- sectional study. Paediatrics 2011; 128:463-70.

20.  Van Dieren S, Nöthlings U, Van Der Schouw YT, Spijkerman AMW, Rutten GEHM, Van Der ADL et al. Non-fasting lipids and risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 2011; 54:73–7.

21.  Folsom AR, Kuba K, Leupker RV, Jacobs DR, Frantz ID JR. Lipid concentrations in serum and EDTA-treated plasma from fasting and nonfasting normal persons, with particular regard to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Clin Chem 1983; 29:505-8.

22.  Kim M, Suk J, Kim H, Jung H, Kim T, Park J. Post-prandial lipid levels for assessing target goal achievement in type 2 diabetic patients taking statin. J Korean Med Sci 2010; 25:387-92.

23.  Langsted A, Nordestgaard BG. Nonfasting lipids, lipoproteins and apolipoproteins in individuals with and without diabetes: 58434 individuals from the Copenhagen general population study. Clin Chem 2011; 57:482-9.

24.  Weiss R, Harder M, Rowe J. The relationship between nonfasting and fasting lipid measurements in patients with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving treatment with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme a reductase inhibitors. Clin Ther 2003; 25:1490-7.

25.  De Ferranti S, Shapiro D, Markowitz R, Neufeld E, Rifai N, Bernstein H. Nonfasting low-density lipoprotein testing: utility for cholesterol screening in pediatric primary care. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2007; 46:441-5.

26.  Harris N, Neufeld EJ, Newburger JW, Ticho B, Baker A, Ginsburg GS et al. Analytical performance and clinical utility of a direct LDL-cholesterol assay in a hyperlipidemic pediatric population. Clin Chem 1996; 42:1182-8.

27.  Suryabhan LL, Chandrashekhar MI, Ratnendra RS, Prerna DN. A comparative study on the fasting and the postprandial dyslipidaemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Diagn Res 2013; 7:627-30.

28.  Fu ZF, Liu ML. Postprandial changes of blood lipid after ordinary Chinese diet and the influencing factors thereof. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2009; 89:260-2

29.  Eberly LE, Stamler J, Neaton JD. Multiple risk factor intervention trial research groups. Relation of triglyceride levels, fasting and nonfasting, to fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163:1077-83.

30.  Cohn JS, Mcnamara JR, Schaefer EJ. Lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations in the plasma of human subjects as measured in the fed and fasted states. Clin Chem 1988; 34:2456-9.

31.  Nordestgaard BG, Freiberg JJ. Clinical relevance of non-fasting and postprandial hypertriglyceridemia and remnant cholesterol. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2011; 9:281-6

32.  Lindman AS, Veierød MB, Tverdal A, Pedersen JJ, Selmer R. Nonfasting triglycerides and risk of cardiovascular death in men and women from the Norwegian counties study. Eur J Epidemiol 2010; 25:789-98.

33.  Kolovou GD, Mikhailidis DP, Kovar J, Lairon D, Nordestgaard BG, Ooi TC et al. Assessment and clinical relevance of non-fasting and postprandial triglycerides: an expert panel statement. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2011; 9:258-70.

34.  Langsted A, Freiberg JJ, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Schnohr P, Jensen GB, Nordestgaard BG. Nonfasting cholesterol and triglycerides and association with risk of myocardial infarction and total mortality; the Copenhagen city heart study with 31 years of follow up. J Intern Med 2011; 270:65-75.

35.  Freiberg JJ, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Jensen JS, Nordestgaard BG. Nonfasting triglycerides and risk of ischemic stroke in the general population. Jama 2008; 300:2142-52.

36.  Stalenhoef AF, De Graaf J. Association of fasting and non fasting serum triglycerides with cardiovascular disease and the role of remnant like lipoproteins and small dense LDL. Curr Opin Lipidol 2008; 19:355-61.

37.  Bansal S, Buring JE, Rifai N, Mora S, Sacks FM, Ridker PM. Fasting compared with non fasting triglycerides and risk of cardiovascular events in women. Jama 2007; 298:309-16.

38.  Nordestgaard BG, Benn M, Schnohr P, Tybjaerg-Hansen A. Nonfasting triglycerides and risk of myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, and death in men and women. Jama 2007; 298:299-308.

39.  Mark Deeg. Who, what, and when to test patients for dyslipidemias. Lipid Topics.

40.  Iso H, Naito Y, Sato S, Kitamura A, Okamura T, Sankai T et al. Serum triglycerides and risk of coronary heart disease among Japanese men and women. Am J Epidemiol 2001; 153:490-9.

41.  Coppack SW. Postprandial lipoproteins in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med 1997;14 Suppl 3:S67-74

42.  Stampfer MJ, Krauss RM, Ma J, Blanche PJ, Holl LG, Sacks FM et al. A prospective study of triglyceride level, low density lipoprotein particle diameter, and risk of myocardial infarction. Jama 1996; 276:882-8.

43.  Patsch JR, Miesenböck G, Hopferwieser T, Mühlberger V, Knapp E, Dunn JK et al. Relation of triglyceride metabolism and coronary artery disease: Studies in the postprandial state. Arterioscler Thromb 1992; 12:1336-45.

Corresponding Author

Lokesh Gupta

Department of medicine, Mata Chanan Devi Hospital, Janakpuri, New Delhi