Estimation of Reference Range of Serum Protein Fractions in an Urban South Indian Population

Title: Estimation of Reference Range of Serum Protein Fractions in an Urban South Indian Population

Authors: Dr Radhika Krishnaswamy, B.Vani, Priyadharshini K

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v4i9.56

Abstract

Reference interval in a laboratory when applied to the population serviced by the laboratory includes most of the subjects with characteristics similar to the reference group to be identified as ‘healthy’ and excludes the others. The reference range and reference limits for various Biochemistry parameters has not been established in our Indian population. As on date, most of our laboratories are using the text book values, literature referred values or manufacturer’s reference value in the kit inserts. In India, like many other biochemical parameters the interpretation of serum protein fractions obtained by the electrophoresis and the total protein by Biuret method is usually dependent on the reference range which is mainly obtained from Western population. The aim of the present study is to determine the reference range of serum proteins fractions and total protein of a sample population attending a tertiary care center in Bangalore, Karnataka the by semi automated cellulose acetate electrophoresis method and Biuret method and to compare the newly obtained reference range of serum proteins with the currently used manufacturers reference range in the laboratory which is based on western population. The samples obtained from individuals coming for executive health check up at this tertiary care center were used for this study. Serum Total protein and other protein fractions were measured in the samples and reference range was determined. We found noticeable deviation in the new reference ranges of some parameters such as total protein, albumin, γ globulin from the manufacturers values. We conclude that the reference ranges observed in a small population in a city could be significantly different from the literature referred values and generating any such data for any biochemical parameters in more partitioned groups and larger sample size will be of great significance to the clinicians using such data during clinical intervention.

Keywords: Reference Range; Reference interval; Serum proteins; Serum protein electrophoresis.

References

1. Solberg HE. (1987) International federation of clinical chemistry, Expert panel on theory of reference values. Approved recommendation on the theory of reference values. Part 1. Concept of reference values. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem.1987; 25:337-342.

2. Horn PS, Pesce AJ. Reference intervals: An update. Clin Chim Acta 2003;334:5–23.

3. Schneider AJ. Some thoughts on normal, or standard, values in clinical medicine. Pediatrics 1960;26:973–84.

4. Ceriotti F. Prerequisites for use of common reference intervals. Clin Biochem Rev 2007;28:115–21.

5. Gräsbeck R. The evolution of the reference value concept. Clin Chem Lab Med 2004; 42:692-697.

6. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. How to define and determine reference intervals in the clinical laboratory? Approved guidelines. NCCLS Documents C28-A 1995:27-30 NCCLS Villanova, P A.

7. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute/NCCLS. Procedures for the Collection of Diagnostic Blood Specimens by Venipuncture; Approved Standard – Fifth Edition. CLSI/NCCLS document H3-A5 [ISBN 1-56238-515-1]. CLSI, 940west valley road, suite 1400, Wayne, PA 19087-1898 USA, 2003.

8. Smith MB, Equivalency of Serum and Plasma Test Results on 42 Methods on Dimension Clinical Chemistry System, Dade Behring, Newark, DE 2001.

9. Kingsley gr. The direct biuret method for the determination of serum protein as applied to photoelectric and visual colorimetry, J Lab Clin 1942; 27:840-845.

10. Henry RJ, Sobel C, Berkman S. Interferences with biuret methods for serum proteins, Anal Chem 1957; 29:1491-1495.

11. Henry RJ. Clinical Chemistry, Principles and Technics, Harper and Row. New York, NY 1974, pp 407-421.

12. Serum protein analysis by molecular interpretation of cellulose acetate electrophoresis. Evaluation of its clinical usefulness. Aguzzi F., Petrini C., Merlini G., et al In: B.G. Radola, Electrophoresis 79,Pag.81, Ed. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, (1980).

13. Passey RB, maluf KC. Linearity and calibration: a clinical laboratory perspective. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1992; 116(7):757-760.

14. Garry W. Shires. Correspondence of linearity evaluations to the performance of clinical chemistry instrument and reagent system. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1992; 116:761-764.

15. Grasbeck, R. and Alstrom, T. (Eds.) (1981) Reference Values in laboratory medicine: Thecurrent state of Art. Chiche-ster, England, JohnWiley and Sons, Ltd..

16. Harris, E.K. and Boyd, J.C. (1995) Statistical basis of Reference Values in Laboratory medicine. New York: Marcel Dekker.

17. Solberg, H.E. and Stamm, D. (1991) Approved recommendation on the theory of ReferenceValues. Part 4 control of analytical variation in the production, transfer and application of Reference Values. Eur. J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 29, 531-535.17.

18. Whitehead, T.P., Robinson, D., Hale, A.C. and Bailey, A.R. (1994) Clinical Chemis-try and haematology: adult Reference Values. London: BUPA Medical Research and Development Ltd.

19. Anders, Kallner, Elisabeth, Gustavsson and Eva, Hendig. (2000) Can age and sex related ref measurements in Primary Health Care? Clin.Chem. Lab. Med. 38, 7, 633-654.

Corresponding Author

Dr Radhika Krishnaswamy

Associate Professor, Dept of Biochemistry, St.John’s Medical College,

Bangalore-560034, Karnataka India

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Telephone: 9448352907