Abstract

Patients who were symptomatic attended the gynecology OPD of RMMCH with complaints of white discharge; irregular menstrual bleeding, postmenopausal bleeding and post coital bleeding between Dec 2003 to June 2005 were included in this study. All these patients were subjected to routine tests and also PAP smears were taken and also coloposcopy biopsy was done where ever required. Later the clinico-histopathological correlation was done and compared with other studies.

Aims and Objectives: The present study was undertaken to evaluate the clinico-histopathological pattern in symptomatic women aged 21yrs and above attending the gynecology OPD of RMMCH with complaints of white discharge, irregular menstrual bleeding, postmenopausal bleeding and post coital bleeding between Dec 2003 to June 2005 were included in this study. Clinical features and histopathological examination were studied.

1.      Naib Z M : Exfoliative Cytology, Little Brown company Boston / Toronto, 3^rd edition pg 15.

2.      Naib Z M: Exfoliative Cytology, Little Brown Company Boston / Toronto, 3^rd edition, pg 21-38.

3.      Richart R.M: Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Clin . obstet . Gynaecol ., 748 – 754, 1967.

4.      Lucus A.J., Williams D.R: Cervical cytology of patients attending a venereal disease clinic. J. obstet. Gynaec . Brit . C. welth., 104 -110, 1967.

5.      Rotkin I.D : A comparison review of key  epidemiologic studies in cervical cancer related to cervical cancer related to current searches for transmissible agent . Cancer Res, 1353 – 1357, 1973.

6.      Rotkin I.D and Cameran J.R : Cluster of variable influencing risk of cervical. Cancer. Cancer, 663, 1968

7.      Coleman D.V., Evans D.M.D : Biopsy and Pathology and Cytology of the Cervix.Chapman and Hall Ltd. , London, 1^st  Edition, p 3-4, 7-9, 197 to237 ,1988.

8.      Naylor B. Acta Cytologica, Vol 44, No. 5, Sept – Oct 2000.

9.      Roald D. Luff : The Bethesda system for reporting cervical / vaginal Cytological diagnoses :Human Pathology; Vol. 23, No.7, July 1992.

10.  Barbara S.A and Zoschnick .L, Thomas C.W: American Family

11.  Sherman ME, Tabbara SO, Scott DR, Kurman RJ, Glass AG, Manos MM, et al. “ Ascus, ruleout HSIL” : cytologic features, histologic correlates and Human Papilloma virus detection. Mod. Pathol 1999;12:335 – 42

12.  Sherman ME, Solomon D, Schiffman M; ASCUS LSIL Triage study Group. Qualification of ASCUS. A comparison of equivocal LSIL and equivocal HSIL on cervical cytology in the ASCUS Triage study Am. J clin Path 2001;116:386 – 94

13.  Joste NE, Rushing L, Granados R. Zitz JC, Genest DR, Crum CP, et al. Bethesda classification of cervicovaginal smears : reproducibility and viral correlates. Human Pathol 1996;27: 581-5.

14.  Davey DD, Naryshkin S, Nielsen ML, KlineTS. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: interlaboratory comparison and quality assurance monitors. Diagn. Cytopathol 1994;11:390 – 6

15.  Duggan MA, Brasher PM. Accuracy of Pap tests reported as CIN I. Diagn cytopathol 1999;21:129 – 36.

16.  Kurman R, Solomon D. The Bethesda system for reporting cervical / vaginal cytologic diagnoses, definitions, criteria, and explanatory notes for terminology and specimen adequacy. New York, N.Y. Springer – Verlag, 1994.

17.  Karim BO, Burroughs H, Rosenthal DL, Ali SZ. Endometrial- type cells in cervico–vaginal smears: Clinical             significance and          cytopathologic correlates. Diagn cytopathol 2002; 26: 123-7.

18.  Soost HJ, Bockmuhl B, Zock H: The effectiveness of cervical cytology screening for cervical cancer (author’s trans1) : Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1979 Sep21;104 (38) : 1331 – 5 [Article in German].

19.  Bang R.A, Bang A.T, M. Baitule, Choudhary Y, S. Sarmukaddam, Tale. O: High prevalence of gynecological diseases in rural Indian women. The Lancet 1989 Jan 14 ; 85 – 88.

20.  Krane J.F et al “ Papanicolaou smcar Sensitivity for the Detection of Adenocarinoma of the cervix : cancer cytopathol, vol 23, No 1, Feb 25, 2001 pg 8.

21.  JS Misra, Pandey S: cervical Cytology in menopausal women: J. obstel Gynaecol Ind. Vol 38. No. 5 Sept – Oct 2003 pg 468 – 472.

22.  Chhabra Y. Bal GB, Janet K., Patil N : Cytomorphorlogical study of cervical PAP smears for Pre – cancerous and Cancerous Lesions: Journal of cytology, Vol 20, No.2, 2003 Pg 64-67.

23.  Misra JS, Pandey S, Singh U, Srivastava S : Significance of Inflammatory smears in Cervical Cytology: Journal of cytology 2004; 21 (1) : 20 –22.

24.  Misra JS, Das K, Harish A. : Cytological studies in woman complaining of Leucorrhoea : Journal of cytology 14 (1) : 11-13, 1997.

25.  Reagan JW, Hamonic MJ. Dysplasia of uterine cervix. Ann NY cancer. American Journal of Epidemiology 1989; 130; 486 – 96.

26.  Di Bonto L. et al : Cervical Cytopathology : an Evaluation of its Accuracy Based on Cytolistologic comparison. Cancer 1993; 72 : 3002 –6

27.  Mostafa G.M, Songsee S., Mana R.: Accuracy of cytological Findings in Abnormal Cervical  Smears by  cytohistologic comparison. Indian J.Pathol. Microbiol, 43 (1): 23 – 29, 2000.

28.  Jones DED, Creasman WT. Evaluation of the atypical pap smear. Am J obstet Gynaecol 1987; 157 : 544 – 9.

29.  August N. Cervicography for evaluating the ‘atypical’ Papanicolaou smear. J. Repsod med 1991;36:89.

30.  Matsurra Y, Kawagoe T, N. Sugihara and Kashimura M. Early cervical neoplasia confirmed by conization; diagnostic accuracy of cytology colposcopy and punch biopsy. Act Cytol 40; 241 – 246, 1996.