Title: Effectiveness of Trunk Rehabilitation and Balance Training in Improving Trunk Control and Balance in Hemiplegic Patients

Authors: Dr A. Kiran Kumar M.P.T (Neuro), Dr G. Nandini, Dr K. Suneel Kumar, Dr M.V Naga Bhushanam

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v4i12.70

Abstract

Background:  Stroke is defined as rapidly developing Clinical Signs of focal disturbance of Cerebral functions, lasting for more than 24 hours (or) leading to death with no appropriate cause other than that of vascular origin.  The aim of trunk rehabilitation and balance training is to improve trunk stability and trunk muscle performance.

Objective:   To determine the effectiveness of trunk rehabilitation and balance in hemiplegic patients and to compare the trunk rehabilitation and balance training with conventional physiotherapy.

Material & Methodology:  30 subjects with hemplegia were selected in the study according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and divided into 2 groups. Patients in Interventional group were given trunk rehabilitation and balance training.  Patients in control group were given conventional physiotherapy.  Berg balance scale and trunk impairment scale will be used as clinical outcome measures to evaluate the effectiveness of training method in improving trunk control and balance respectively.

Result: Comparison between 2 groups was analyzed using the unpaired t-test.  It revealed a statistically significant difference of p-value (p<0.001) between the TIS scoring of group A & B and also showed a showed a statistically significant difference of p-value (p<0.001) between the berg balance scale scorings of group A & Group B.

References

1.    1.      JN. Panicker, N. Thomus, K. Pavithran, D. Nair, P.S. Sarma.  Morbidity predictors in ischemic stroke neurology India 2003; 51:49-51.

2.      Bhalla et al. Predicting Mortality in stroke, Neurology India, Vol.50; 3 Sept.2002, PP 279-281.

3.      O’Sullivan SB & Schmitz 200, Physical Rehabilitation assessment and treatment, 4th edn., F.A. Davis, Philadelphia, PP.519-581.

4.      Sarah F Tyson, Maric Hanley, Jay Chillala, And reaselley and Raymond C Tallis.  Balance disability after stroke: Physical therapy. 2006, 86: 30-38.

5.      Karatas M, Cetin N, Bayran Moglu M, Dilek A. Trunk Muscle strength in relation to balance and functional disability in stroke patients Am, Phys Med Rehabilitation 2004; 83 : 81-87.

6.      Rohannon Rc.Recovery and Correlates of trunk Muscle strength after stroke.  Int. J Rehabili Re S1995; 18:262-67.

7.      Franchignoni FP, Tesio L, Ricupero C, Martino MT. trunk Control test as an early predictor of stroke rehabilitation outcome. Stroke 1997; 28 : 1382-1385.

8.      Mertin J, Neiuwboer-A, Verhyden G, Preger R, Kiekens C, Willy De Weerdt. Trunk impairment scale: a new tool to measure motor impairment of the trunk after stroke, Clinical Rehabilitation 2004; 18:326-34.

9.      P.M. Davis, “Problems associated with the loss of selective trunk Activity in Hemiplegia”.  In: P.M. Davis, E.d., Right in the middle selective trunk activity in the treatment of Adult hemiplegia. 1990, PP.31-65.

10.  HSiech CL, SheuCF, Hsuch pl, wang CH, Trunk Control as an early predictor of comprehensive activities of daily living function in stroke patients.  Stroke 2002; 33.262-66.

11.  Verheyden G.Nieuwboer A1 Feys H1 Schuback Baert L, jenni w.e.t.al. Trunk performance after stroke; an eye catching predictor of functional outcome J. Neurol Neurosurgery. Psychiatry 2007; 78: 694-698.

12.  G. Verheyden, L.Vereeck, S. Truijen, M. Troch, I.Hergodts, C. Laffose, et.al. “Trunk performance after stroke and relationship with balance, gait and functional ability.  Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol.20, No.5, 2006, P.P.451-458.

13.  Flansb Jer UB. Progressive resistance training after stroke: effects on muscle strength, muscle tone, gait performance and perceived participation; Journal od Rehabilitation Medicine. 2008; 40(1):42-8.

14.  Sara Ahmed, Nancy mayo, Johanne Higgins, Nancy M Salbach, Lois Finch Sharon L Wood, Dauphine; The stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement: a comparison with other measures used to evaluate the effect of stroke and rehabilitation; Physical therapy; 2003; 83: 617-30.

15.  S. Tanaka, K. Hachisuka and H. Ogata, “Trunk Rotatory Muscle Performance in Post-Stroke Hemiplegic Patients,” American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilita-tion, Vol. 76, No. 5, 1997, pp. 366-369. 

Corresponding Author

Dr A. Kiran Kumar M.P.T (Neuro)

Professor, Department of Physiotherapy

Narayana Medical College and Hospital