Title: The Role of Obstetric Doppler Velocimetry Studies In Predicting Mode of Delivery and Perinatal Outcome

Authors: Dr Rahul Sangolkar, Dr Rohit Sangolkar

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v4i12.03

Abstract

Background: The antenatal fetal surveillance aims at detecting any evidence of fetal jeopardy at the earliest. The practice of routine late third trimester obstetric ultrasound with Doppler Velocimetry has been shown to improve detection of fetal growth restriction at an early stage when prompt measures can be taken. Ultrasonography with Doppler Velocimetry has become a useful tool in antenatal surveillance because of its safety, non-invasiveness and reliability in antenatal fetal surveillance.

This study was done to analyze the role of Obstetric Doppler Velocimetry studies in predicting mode of delivery and perinatal outcome.

Methods: The study was carried out in 112 pregnant females attending the antenatal clinic at Prakash Institute of Medical Sciences, Urun-Islampur and Govt. Medical College, Miraj.All pregnant women above 32 weeks of gestation attending the Obstetrics Outpatient Department were included in the study and they were subjected to ultrasonography with Doppler Velocimetry examination between 32 to 36 weeks of gestation. Antenatal Doppler Velocimetry examination results were used to compare the mode of delivery and perinatal outcome.

Results:

1.      Operative interference in form of LSCS was more common in cases with abnormal Doppler Velocimetry findings as compared to those cases withnormal Doppler Velocimetry findings (76.48%vs. 16.66%).

2.      NICU admission rates were higher among cases with abnormal Doppler Velocimetry as compared to those with normal Doppler Velocimetry (73.53% vs. 7.7%)

Conclusions: Abnormal Doppler Velocimetry displayed significant association with operative interference in form of LSCS and also with poor perinatal outcome.

Keywords: Ultrasonography, Doppler Velocimetry, NICU Admission, mode of delivery, perinatal outcome.

References

 1.      Bakalis S1Akolekar RGallo DMPoon LCNicolaides KH. Umbilical and fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler at 30-34 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr; 45(4):409-20.

2.      Plnjnemborg R, Bland JM, Robertson WB, Brosen I. Uteroplacental arterial changes related to interstitial trophoblastic migration in early human pregnancy.  Placenta. 1983 Oct-Dec;4(4):397–413.

3.      Papageorghiou AT, Yu CK, Bindra R, Pandis G, Nicolaides KH, et al. Multicenter screening for pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by transvaginal uterine artery Doppler at 23 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Nov;18(5):441–9.

4.      Bower S, Vyas S, Campbell S, Nicolaides KH. Colour Doppler imaging of the uterine artery in pregnancy: normal ranges of impedance to blood flow, mean velocity and volume of flow. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jul 1; 2(4):261–5.

5.      Aardema MW, Saro MCS, Lander M, De Wolf BTM, et al. Second trimester Doppler ultrasound screening of the uterine arteries differentiates between subsequent normal and poor outcomes of hypertensive pregnancy: two different pathophysiological entities? ClinSci (Lond) 2004 Apr; 106(4):377–82.

6.      Roma E, Arnau A, Berdala R, Bergos C, Montesinos J, Figueras F. Ultrasound screening for fetal growth restriction at 36 vs. 32 weeks' gestation: a randomized trial (ROUTE). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.  2015 Oct;46(4):391-7

7.      Alfirevic Z, Neilson JP. Doppler Ultrasonography in high risk pregnancies: systematic review with meta-analysis. Am J ObstetGynecol 1995; 172: 1379-87

8.      SpongCV. Prediction and prevention of recurrent preterm birth. ObstetObstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug;110(2 Pt 1):405–15.Ibekwe PC. Rising trends in caesarean section rates: an issue of major concern in Nigeria. Niger J Med.2004; 13(2):180–1.

9.      Onrust S, Santema JG, Aarnoudse JG. Pre-eclampsia and the HELLP syndrome still cause maternal mortality in the Netherlands and other developed countries: can we reduce it? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1999 Jan; 82(1):41–6.

10.  Whitworth M, Quenby S, Cockerill RO, Dowswell T. Specialised antenatal clinics for women with a pregnancy at high risk of preterm birth (excluding multiple pregnancy) to improve maternal and infant outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep; 7(9):CD006760.

11.  Isalm ZSDileep DMunim S. Prognostic value of obstetric Doppler ultrasound in fetuses with fetal growth restriction: an observational study in a tertiary care hospital. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 Jan; 28(1):12-5.

12.  Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with use of head, body and femur measurements – a prospective study. Am J ObstetGynecol 1985; 151: 333-7

13.  Figueras F, Meler E, Iraola A, Eixarch E, Coll O, figueras J, Gratacos E, Gardosi J. customized birthweight standards for a Spanish population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008; 136: 20-4.

14.  Vyas S, Campbell S, Bower S, Nicolaides KH. Maternal abdominal pressure alters fetal cerebral blood flow. Br J ObstetGynecol 1990; 97: 740-2.

15.  Poon LC, Volpe N, Muto B, Syngelaki A, Nicolaides KH. Birthweight with gestation and maternal characteristics in live births and stillbirths. Fetal DiagnTher 2012; 32: 156-61.

Corresponding Author

Dr Rahul Sangolkar

Plot No. 208, Balaji Nagar, Kupwad Road, Sangli, Maharashtra, India.

Telephone No: +91 9960792044

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.