Title: A Comparative Study of Prophylactic Neurectomy and Nerve Preservation in open Inguinal Hernia Repair

Authors: Dr Hafiz Kalam Uddin, Dr Md Anisur Rahman, Dr Samar, Dr Md Akbar Khan

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v11i4.20

Abstract

Background: Chronic post operative groin pain is a significant complication following inguinal hernial repair. Recently, with more attention to patient outcomes, chronic groin pain has replaced recurrence as the primary complication after open inguinal hernia repair and has emerged as a common and sometimes severe problem that can significantly affect a patient’s, health-related, quality of life. Chronic groin pain can be classified into neuropathic and nociceptive (somatic) pain. Neuropathic pain is caused due to entrapment or direct nerve injury. Nociceptive (somatic) pain is caused by mesh-related fibrosis, mechanical pressure caused by a folded mesh and etcetera. Traditionally, surgeons opt to preserve the nerves at all times during repair because the nerve injury is often associated with cutaneous sensory loss and chronic groin pain. On the contrary, elective division of the nerves to reduce the incidence of chronic post operative pain has been recommended. Recently reported randomized controlled trials have confirmed the benefits of neurectomy in chronic post op pain.

In our institution, open inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common surgeries performed. This study aims at evaluating the long-term outcomes of neuralgia and paraesthesia following routine nerves excision, compared to nerve preservation.

Aims and Objective

To compare and correlate the therapeutic effectiveness of neurectomy versus nerve preservation with respect to - Post operative groin pain.

-Post operative par aesthesia.

- Post operative patient satisfaction and wellbeing.

Materials and Methods: The present study is a randomized study of cases of inguinal hernias admitted in Katihar Medical College Katihar, during the study period of January 2021 to August 2022.  50 cases for the purpose of the study were selected on the basis of the random sampling method and after taking valid inform consent.

Patients with inguinal hernia underwent open hernia repair were with either prophylactic triple neurectomy (group A) or nerve preservation (group B) during operation. All operations were performed by surgeons specialized in hernia repair under local anaesthesia or spinal anaesthesia. The primary outcome was the incidence of chronic groin pain at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included incidence of groin numbness, postoperative sensory loss or change at the groin region, and quality of life measurement. All follow-up and outcome measures were carried out at 1and 6 months following surgery.

Results: The incidence of chronic groin pain at 6 months was significantly lower in group A than group B. No significant intergroup differences were found regarding the incidence of groin numbness, postoperative sensory loss or changes at the groin region, and quality of life measurement at 6 months after the operation.

Conclusions: Prophylactic neurectomy significantly decreases the incidence of chronic groin pain after open hernia repair without added morbidities. It should be considered as a routine surgical step during the operation

References

  1. [No authors listed]. Classification of chronic pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Prepared by the International Association for the Study of Pain, Subcommittee on Taxonomy. Pain Suppl1986 3;S1-S226.
  2. Geir WP, Kuldeep S, Gillian GK. An algorithm for the treatment   of   chronic   pain   after   inguinal herniorrhaphy.  In  :Nyhus  LM,  Condon  RE,  Hernia.  5th  ed.  Philadelphia:  JB  Lippincott;  2000:307-16.
  3. Rutkow IM, Robbins AW. Demographic, classificatory, and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States. Surg Clin North Am 1993;73:413.
  4. Sakorafas GH, Halikias I, Nissotakis C, Kotsifopoulos N, Stavrou A, Antonopoulos C,et al. Open tension-free repair of inguinal hernias; the Lichtenstein technique. BMC surgery. 2001 Dec;1(1):3.
  5. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG,Amid PK, Montllor MM. The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg. Feb 1;157(2): 188-93.
  6. Stoppa RE. The treatment of complicated groin and incisional hernias. World JSurg1989;13:545-554.
  7. Janu PG, Sellers KD, Mangiante EC. Recurrent inguinal hernia. Preferred operative approach. Am Surg1998;64:569-573.
  8. Memon, M. A., Cooper, N. J., Memon, B., Memon, M. I., & Abrams, K. R. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. BritishJournal of Surgery.2016; 103(8), 903-912.
  9. Charalampakis, V., Seretis, C., & de Bree, E. (2019). Surgical techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Hernia, 23(1), 15-26.
  10. Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R. Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc. 2005 Mar;19(3):188-99.
  11. Poobalan AS, Bruce J, Smith WC, King PM, Krukowski ZH, Chambers WA. A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Clin J Pain. 2003 Nov-Dec;19(6):48-54.
  12. Huang, X., Cheng, Y., & Huang, Y. An exploratory study on the effect of COVID-19 on online education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange.2020; 13(1), 1-14.
  13. Wang, H. Q., Zhu, B., Jiang, W. H., Chen, X. M., Zhou, L. Y., & Liu, L. (2020). A randomized controlled trial of nerve-sparingradicalhysterectomy vs. standard radical hysterectomy. BMC Cancer, 20(1), 1-7.

Corresponding Author

Dr Md Anisur Rahman

Postgraduate, Department of General Surgery, Katihar Medical College, Katihar