Details
Category: Volume 09 Issue 12 December 2021
Hits: 630

Title: Profile of Bile Duct Injuries Occurring as a Complication of Open/Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Authors: Dr V. Manmadha Rao, Dr D. Narendra Babu, Dr T. Durga Samyukta

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v9i12.30

Abstract

Background: In utero complex development of the liver, and the biliary system can result in multiple anatomic variations. Knowledge about these anatomic variants is required for the safe performance of any hepatobiliary surgery. Cholecystectomy remains the major source ofbile duct injuries (BDI) given the frequency with which it is performed. Various studies worldwide have documented an increase in the frequency of bile duct injuries associated with the laparoscopic approach, ranging from 0.4% to 1.3%.

Aims and Objectives: To study the incidence of bile duct injuries managed at our hospital and note the conditions contributing to them, document the site of the injury and their methods of management.

Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was performed with 25 patients from July 2018 to June 2020 in the Department of General Surgery, King George Hospital, Visakhapatnam. Patients of age 35 to 70 years who had BDI as a complication of open/laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included. 

Details regarding the presence of aberrant anatomy, timing of the onset of symptoms and the time from injury to recognition of BDI were noted.

Results: The incidence of bile duct injury was 1.82% with a mean age of 48.7 years. Majority of the injuries were seen in patients undergoing cholecystectomy for cholecystitis >72 hours duration. BDI was documented to be of common hepatic duct (CHD) in 40%, common bile duct (CBD) in 40%, and cystic duct in 20%.

Conclusion: Factors contributing to BDI are acute cholecystitis, cholangitis, pancreatitis, and choledocholithiasis. Definitive repair should be done only after detailed investigation of site and type of injury.

Keywords: Bile duct injury, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, open cholecystectomy, complications of cholecystectomy, Iatrogenic injury of bile duct, hepatobiliary surgery, common bile duct, cystic duct, anomalies of biliary system.

References

  1. Roslyn JJ, et, al, 1993: Open cholecystectomy: a contemporary analysis of 42,474 patients. Ann Surg 218:129-137.
  2. Strasberg SM, et, al, 1995: An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180:101-125.
  3. Adamsen S, et, al, 1997: Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective nationwide series. . J Am Coll Surg 184:571-578.
  4. Deziel DJ, et, al, 1993: Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. J Am Coll Surg 165:9-14.
  5. Mac Fadyen JB, et, al, 1998: Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the United States experience. Surg Endosc 12:315-321.
  6. Richardson MC,et, al, 1996: Incidence and nature of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 5913 cases. West of Scotland Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Audit Group. Br J Surg 83:1356- 1360.
  7. Wherry DC et, al, An external audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the steady state performed in medical treatment facilities of the department of defence. Ann Surg ;1996.
  8. The Southern Surgeons Club, 1991: A prospective analysis of 1,518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by southern US surgeons.NEng J Med 324:1073-1078.
  9. Gigot J,et, al 1997: The dramatic reality of biliary tract injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an anonymous multicentre Belgian survey of 65 patients. SurgEndosc 11: 1171-1178.
  10. Woods MS, et, al, 1994: Characteristics of biliary tract complications during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional study. Am J Surg 167:27- 34.
  11. Russell JC, et, al 1996: Bile duct injuries,1989-1993. a state-wide experience. Connecticut laparoscopic cholecystectomy registry. Arch Surg 131:382-388.
  12. Fletcher DR,et, al 1999: Complications of cholecystectomy:risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective efforts of operative cholangiography. Ann Surg 229:449-457.
  13. Walsh RM, et, al 1998:Trends in bile duct injuries from laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2:458-462.
  14. Carroll BJ, et, al 1996: Routine cholangiography reduces sequelae of common bile duct injuries. Surg endoscopic 10:1194-1197.
  15. Braasch JW. Congenital anomalies of the gallbladder and bile ducts. Surg Clin North Am 1958:38-627.
  16. Johnston EV, Anson BJ. Variations in the formation and vascular relationships of the bile ducts. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1952.
  17. Newman HF, Northrup JD. Extrahepatic biliary tract anatomy. West J Surg Obstet Gynecol 1963:71-59.
  18. Davidoff AM, et, al, 1992: Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Ann Surg 215:196-208.
  19. Healey JE Jr, Schroy PC Anatomy of the biliary ducts within the human liver: analysis of the prevailing pattern of branchings and the major variations of the biliary ducts. Arch Surg1953;66:599.
  20. Hermann RE. Manual of Surgery of the Gallbladder, Bile Duct and Endocrine Pancreas. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1979.
  21. Michels NA. Blood Supply and Anatomy of the Upper Abdominal Organs. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1955.
  22. Daseler E, Anson B, Hambley W, Reiman A. Cystic artery and constituents of the hepatic pedicle. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1947;85: 47.
  23. Van Damme JP, Bonte J. The branches of the celiac trunk. Acta Anat1985;122:110.
  24. Van Damme JP. Behavioral anatomy of the abdominal arteries. Surg Clin North Am 73(4):699-725, 1993.
  25. Suzuki T, Nakayasu A, Kauabe K, Takeda H, Honjo I. Surgical significance of anatomic variations of the hepatic artery. Am J Surg1971;122:505.
  26. Healey JE Jr, Schroy PC, Sorensen RJ. The intrahepatic distribution of the hepatic artery in man. J Int Coll Surg1953;20:133.
  27. Nikolić V. Arterecystiquere currente. Bull Assoc Anat 1967;136: 739.
  28. Balija M, Huis M, Nikolić V, Štulhofer M. Laparoscopic visualization of the cystic artery anatomy. World J Surg1999;23:703-707
  29. Northover JMA, Terblanche J, 1979: A new look at the arterial blood supply of the bile duct in man and its surgical implications.Br J Surg 66:379-384.
  30. Parke WW, Michels NA, Ghosh GM. Blood supply of the common bile duct. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1963:117:47.

Corresponding Author

Dr T. Durga Samyukta

M.B.B.S, Post Graduate in Department of General Surgery, Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh