Title: A Study on Current Status of Syndesmotic Injuries

Author: Dr Rahmat Ali

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v9i11.33

Abstract

Syndesmotic injuries are common after ankle fractures. This review aims to present current concepts about the diagnosis and treatment of these injuries.

Keywords: Ankle fractures, Ankle joint, Malleolar fracture, Syndesmosis, Syndesmotic injury.

References

  1. Park SS, Kubiak EN, Egol KA, et al. Stress radiographs after ankle fracture: the effect of ankle position and deltoid ligament status on medial clear space measurements. J Orthop Trauma 2006;20(1):11–18. DOI: 10.1097/01.bot.0000189591.40267.09.
  2. Lambert LA, Falconer L, Mason L. Ankle stability in ankle fracture. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2020;11(3):375–379. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.03.010.
  3. Bäcker HC, Vosseller JT, Harald B, et al. Weightbearing radiography and MRI findings in ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Spec 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1938640020921571.
  4. Großterlinden LG, Hartel M, Yamamura J, et al. Isolated syndesmotic injuries in acute ankle sprains: diagnostic significance of clinical examination and MRI. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24(4):1180–1186. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3604-x.
  5. Warner SJ, Garner MR, Fabricant PD, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging in predicting deltoid ligament ruptures in ankle fractures. HSS J 2019;15(2):115–121. DOI: 10.1007/s11420-018-09655-x.
  6. Phisitkul P, Ebinger T, Goetz J, et al. Forceps reduction of the syndesmosis in rotational ankle fractures: a cadaveric study. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A 2012;94(24): 2256–2261. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01726.
  7. Vetter SY, Beisemann N, Keil H, et al. Comparison of three different reduction methods of the ankle mortise in unstable syndesmotic injuries. Sci Rep 2019;9(1). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-51988-y.
  8. Sagi HC, Shah AR, Sanders RW. The functional consequence of syndesmotic joint malreduction at a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Orthop Trauma 2012;26(7): 439–443. DOI: 10.1097/ BOT.0b013e31822a526a.
  9. Li M, Collier RC, Hill BW, et al. Comparing different surgical techniques for addressing the posterior malleolus in supination external rotation ankle fractures and the need for syndesmotic screw fixation. J Foot Ankle Surg 2017;56(4): 730–734. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.01.053.
  10. Markolf KL, Jackson SR, McAllister DR. Syndesmosis fixation using dual 3.5 mm and 4.5 mm screws with tricortical and quadricortical purchase: a biomechanical study. Foot Ankle Int 2013;34(5):734–739. DOI: 10.1177/1071100713478923.
  11. Parker AS, Beason DP, Slowik JS, et al. Biomechanical comparison of 3 syndesmosis repair techniques with suture button implants. Orthop J Sport Med 2018;6(10):2325967118804204 10.1177/2325967118804204.
  12. Zhang P, Liang Y, He J, et al. A systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017;18(1): 286. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1645-7.
  13. Rushing CJ, Spinner SM, Armstrong AV, et al. Comparison of different magnitudes of applied syndesmotic clamp force: a cadaveric study. J Foot Ankle Surg 2020;59(3):452–456. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2019. 08.028.
  14. Davidovitch RI, Weil Y, Karia R, et al. Intraoperative syndesmotic reduction: three-dimensional versus standard fluoroscopic imaging. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A 2013;95(20):1838–1843. DOI: 10.2106/ JBJS.L.00382.
  15. Walley KC, Hofmann KJ, Velasco BT, et al. Removal of hardware after syndesmotic screw fixation: a systematic literature review. Foot Ankle Spec 2017;10(3):252–257. DOI: 10.1177/1938640016685153.
  16. Gennis E, Koenig S, Rodericks D, et al. The fate of the fixed syndesmosis over time. Foot Ankle Int 2015;36(10):1202–1208. DOI: 10.1177/1071100715588186.

Corresponding Author

Dr Rahmat Ali (Ms (Ortho), MCh (Ortho) )

Professor and H.O.D (Ortho department), Maharishi Vashishtha Autonomous State Medical College, Basti, UP, India