Title: What all about most modern radiotherapy for cancer patients that is called Image guided radiotherapy and why it is so difficult in Indian context to apply this technology?

Author: Major Retd M.Q. Baig

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v9i11.10

Abstract

Traditional Radiotherapy basically use of anatomical surface landmark as well as  its radiological correlation  with the help of X ray imaging is basically known as  2-D planning, but in modern era of radiotherapy planning IGRT has its impactful role in radiotherapy like   IGRT full  benefits exploited    when large organ motions and setup errors likely to occurs, All patients treated with conformal radiotherapy IGRT/SBRT should be theoretically get benefited, Clinical situations where low dose radiotherapy requires for tumor control or palliative radiotherapy or for superficial tumors are likely to get least benefit by IGRT treatment. Major concerns with IGRT are given below.

1-Limited availability of experience staff is a major concern.

2- In terms of quality control decision whether to go with new plan or continue with original plan.

3- Daily online treatment imaging of patient before treatment makes unnecessary radiation exposure is a threat for development of second malignancy.    

4-Solutions for point number 3 ionizing radiation exposure is now being solved with the development of MR-LINAC.

Keywords: IGRT, IGRT Major concerns, IGRT benefits.

References

  1. Reco C, Clifton Ling C. Broadening the scope of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). Acta Oncol 2008;47:1193-200.
  2. Verellen D, Ridder MD, Storme G. A (short) history of image-guided radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2008;86:4-13.
  3. Bernier J, Hall EJ, Giaccia A. Radiation oncology: A century of achievements. Nat Rev Cancer 2004;4:737-47.
  4. Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Collaborative Working Group. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy: Current status and issues of interest. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001;51:880-914.
  5. Dawson LA, Jaffray DA. Advances in image-guided radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:938-46.
  6. Van Herk M. Different styles of image-guided radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2007;17:258-67.
  7. Korreman S, Rasch C, McNair H, Verellen D, Oelfke U, Maingon P, et al. The European Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology European Institute of Radiotherapy (ESTRO-EIR) report on 3D CT based in-room image guidance systems: A practical and technical review and guide. Radiother Oncol 2010;94:129-44.
  8. Michalski J, Purdy JA, Gaspar L, Souhami L, Ballow M, Bradley J, et al. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Research Plan 2002-2006. Image-Guided Radiation Therapy Committee. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001;51:60-5.
  9. Van Herk M. Errors and margins in radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2004;14:52-64.
  10. Verellen D, De Ridder M, Tournel K, Duchateau M, Reynders T, Gevaert T, et al. An overview of volumetric imaging technologies and their quality assurance for IGRT. Acta Oncol 2008;47:1271-8.
  11. Baumann M, Hölscher T, Zips D. The future of IGRT - cost benefit analysis. Acta Oncol 2008;47:1188-92.
  12. Dawson LA, Sharpe MB. Image-guided radiotherapy: Rationale, benefits, and limitations. Lancet Oncol 2006;7:848-58.
  13. Van Herk M, Barrilot I, Bel A, Bijhold J, Bruce A, de Jaeger K et al. Geometric uncertainties in conformal radiotherapy-and how to deal with them. Brussels: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Electronic Portal Imaging; 2000. p. 5-7.
  14. Simpson DR, Lawson JD, Nath SK, Rose BS, Mundt AJ, Mell LK. A survey of image-guided radiation therapy use in the United States. Cancer 2010;116:3953-60.

Corresponding Author

Major Retd M.Q. Baig

Associate Professor, Radiation oncology, J.K Cancer Institute Kanpur, Utter Pradesh Govt