Title: Clinicopathological Profile of Gynaecological Cancers

Authors: Dr Priyadarsini. S, Dr Harini. T

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v9i1.33

Abstract

Objective: Comprehensive statistics on gynaecological malignancies reported from India are deficient. This study was performed to ascertain the clinicopathological profile of gynaecological cancers reported at our centre.

Materials and Methods: All women attending gynaecological OPD and radiotherapy OPD of TDMCH, Alappuzha who were diagnosed to have malignancy of the cervix, endometrium, ovary and other malignancy of the genital tract are taken as cases and those women without malignancy as excluded by pap smear, ultrasound examination and endometrial sampling are taken as controls. These population are studied for one year period from

Jan 2016 to Jan 2017.

Results: Of the population studied, ovarian malignancy were the commonest malignancy at our centre constituting about 39.8% of the population followed by endometrial and cervical cancer which constitutes about 35.2% and 23.6% respectively. Vulval cancer constitutes about 1.4% The histopathology of various

malignancy were studied and it was found that squamous cell carcinoma of cervix, endometrioid carcinoma of corpus uteri and epithelial ovarian malignancy remains to be the most common clinical type among each group constituting for about 68.75%, 54.16% and 75% respectively. Among the ovarian cancer serous cystadenocarcinoma ovary constitutes about 62.96% .Among the tumour markers studied CA125 is found to be significantly elevated in epithelial ovarian malignancy.

Conclusion: Thus to conclude ovarian and endometrial cancer is on the rise compared to cervical cancer.

Keywords: Gynaecological cancer; clinicopathologic profile; ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancer.

References

  1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al (2008). GLOBOCAN 2008, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 10 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2010. Ganesh B (1995). Effect of lost to follow-up in estimating survival rates. ACTA Universitatis, Ser A, Vol. 440, Tampere, Finland, (Ph.D. Thesis,1995)
  2. Nandakumar A, Ramnath T, Chaturvedi M. The magnitude of cancer cervix in India. Indian J Med Res 2009;130:219-21. Moore MA, Ariyaratne Y, Badar F, Bhurgri Y, Datta K, Mathew A, et al. Cancer Epidemiology in South Asia - Past, Present and future. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2010;11:49-66. Indian Council of Medical Research Bangalore: National Cancer Registry Programme-2007. Consolidated Report of Hospital Based Cancer Registries 2001-2003
  3. Chhabra S, Sonak M, Prem V, Sharma S. Gynaecological malignancies in a rural institute in India. J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 22:426-9. Momtahen S, Kadivar M, Kazzazi AS, Gholipour F. Assessment of gynaecologic malignancies: A multicenter study in Tehran (1995-2005). Indian J Cancer 2009;46:226-30. Ferlay J, Bray F, Pisani P, Parkin DM, editors. GLOBOCAN 2002: Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2004. Seer.cancer.gov [homepage on the internet]. Bethesda, Maryland: North American Association of Central Cancer Registries; c2000. SEER Cancer statistics review Boyle P, Ferlay J. Cancer incidence and mortality in Europe, 2004. Ann Oncol 2005;16:481-8
  4. Whitehead MI, Townsend PT, Pryse-Davies J, Ryder TA, King JB: Effects of estrogens and progestins on the biochemishy and morphology of the postmenopausal endometrium. N Engl J Med 3053599-1605,1981
  5. Folsom AR, Kaye SA, Potter JD, Prineas RJ: Association of incident carcinoma of the endometrium with body weight and fat distribution in older women: Early findings of the Iowa women's health study. Cancer Res 49:682-831, 1989
  6. Albrektsen G, Heuch I, Wik E, Salvesen HB (2009). Parity and time interval since childbirth influence survival in endometrial cancer patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 19, 665-9.
  7. Barrena Medel NI, Herzog TJ, et al (2011). Comparison of the prognostic significance of uterine factors and nodal status for endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 204, 248.
  8. Berkson J, Gage RP (1950). Calculation of survival rates for cancer. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clinic, 25, 270-86.
  9. Cancer Incidence and Patterns in Urban Maharastra-2001, Report to the State of Maharashtra on Status of Cancer, Indian Cancer Society, Cancer Registry Division Division, Mumbai, India. 2007(2)
  10. Nandakumar A, Anatha N, Dhar M, et al (1995). A case-control investigation on cancer of the ovary in Bangalore, India. Int J Cancer, 63, 361-5. (2)
  11. Miller BA, Ries LAG, Hankey BF, Kosary CL, Harras A, Devesa SS, Edwards BK (eds): SEER Cancer Statistics Review: 1973-1990. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; NIH publication 93-2789, 1993.Platz CE, Benda JA: Female genital tract cancer. Cancer 75:27&294,1995
  12. Pettersson B, Adami H, Lindgren A, Hesselius I: Endometrial polyps and hyperplasia as risk factors for endometrial carcinoma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 64:65349, 1985
  13. Kjaerbye-Thygesen A, Huusom LD, Frederiksen K, Kjaer SK (2005). Trends in the incidence and mortality of ovarian cancer in Denmark 1978-2002. Camparison with other Nordic countries. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand, 84, 1006-12.
  14. La Vecchia C (2001). Epidemiology of ovarian cancer: a summary review. Eur J Cancer Prev, 10, 125-9. Muir CS, Waterhouse JAH, Mack T (1987). Cancer incidence in Five Continents, Vol. V, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, IARC Scientific Publication No. 88.

Corresponding Author

Dr Priyadarsini. S

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Govt. Medical College, Trivandrum