Title: Evaluation of Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential in Children of 1-3 Years with Receptive Language Disorder

Authors: Dr Mandrita Chatterjee, Dr Sonali Majumdar, Dr (Prof.) Md. Shoeb Khan

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v8i2.163

Abstract

   

Background: Receptive Language Disorder (RLD) is a condition where a child has trouble understanding and processing words. This can affect the child’s ability to communicate, learn and play with others. Hearing loss is a common cause of language disorders including RLD leading to difficulties with behaviour and poor academic achievement. Early intervention with speech and language therapy improves language outcomes. Brainstem evoked response audiometry (BERA), which assess Brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP), is a non-invasive and objective way to evaluate functional integrity of auditory pathway. It evaluates hearing in terms of the degree of hearing loss and the type of hearing loss.
Aims: The study was done to assess the Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential in children aged 1-3 years with receptive language disorder and to assess if any hearing loss is present by finding out the auditory threshold.
Methods: An observational cross-sectional study was done in a Neurophysiology labof Eastern region of India between December, 2017 to January, 2019. 60 children with receptive language disorder from Paediatric Medicine or otorhinolaryngology (ENT) Department were taken as subjects. They were further assessed by the Early Language Milestone Scale 2 and then subjected to monaural threshold BAEP test after taking proper consent and ethical clearance.Statistical analysis was done by Student t test,
Results: The prolongation of wave ‘I’ and wave ‘V’ latency along with inter peak latencies (III-V, I-V) in both ears compared to Age matched controls was significant (P< 0.05). The auditory threshold was higher in both ears in children with receptive language disorder. The findings of evaluation by Early Language Milestone Scale 2 corresponded to that of BAEP findings.
Conclusions: The above study suggests that there is both central and peripheral neuropathy affecting auditory pathway of the subjects having receptive language disorder.
Keywords: BERA, Speech and Language impairment, Wave ‘V’, Hearing threshold, Interpeak latencies.

References

  1. Law J, Boyle J, Harris F, Harkness A, Nye C. Prevalence and natural history of primary speech and language delay: findings from a systematic review of the literature. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2000 Apr-Jun;35(2):165-88.
  2. Mondal N, Bhat B, Plakkal N, Thulasingam M, Ajayan P, et al. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Speech and Language Delay in Children Less Than Three Years of Age, J Compr Ped. 2016 ; 7(2):e33173
  3. Shetty P. Speech and language delay in children: A review and the role of a pediatric dentist. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012;30:103
  4. Keilmann A, Kluesener P, Freude C, Schramm B.Manifestation of speech and language disorders in children with hearing impairment compared with children with specific language disorders, Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 2011, 36:1, 12-20
  5. Dublin WB. Neurological lesion of erythroblastosis fetalis in relation to nuclear deafness. Am J Clin Pathol 1951; 21: 935-939.
  6. Thornton ARD. Stimulus, recording and subject factor influencing ABR diagnostic criteria.Br J Audiol. 1987; 21:183–189.
  7. Savic L, Milosevic D, Komazec Z. Diagnosis of hearing disorders in children with early evoked auditory brainstem potentials. Med Pregl. 1999; 52(3-5):146–50.
  8. Moore RM, Pinel T, Zhao JH, March R, Jawaid A. Selecting cases from nuclear families for case-control association analysis. 2005; 6 suppl 1:S105.
  9. Coplan J. ELM scale: the early language milestone scale. Austin, Tex.: Pro-Ed, 1987.
  10. Aminoff M.J. Electrodiagnosis in clinical neurology,4th edition, Part II, Churchill Livingstone;451-491.
  11. World health organization. Newborn And Infant hearing screening. Grades of hearing impairment. Accessed August 28 2017. http://www.who.int/pbd/deafness/ hearing_impairment_grades/en/.
  12. Deorari AK, Garg R, Bisht MS, Ahuja GK, Paul VK, Singh M. Auditory brainstem evoked response in normal neonates and infants. Indian Pediatr 1989, 26: 981-986.
  13. Stockard JJ, Stockard JE, Sharbrough FW. Nonpathologic factors influencing brainstem history evoked potential. Am J EEG Technol. 1978; 18:177.
  14. Mishra PK et al. Brainstem auditory evoked responses in neonates with birth asphyxia, Indian journal ofpediatrics 1997, 34:199-205.
  15. Roncagliolo M, Benítez J, Pérez M. Auditory brainstem responses of children with developmental language disorders. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1994;36:26–33
  16. Akshoomoff N, Courchesne E, Yeung-Courchesne R, Costello J. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in receptive developmental language disorder. Brain Lang. 1989 Oct;37(3):409-18.

Corresponding Author

Dr Mandrita Chatterjee

Junior Resident, Department of Physiology, R. G. Kar Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India