Title: Anatomical and positional evaluation of patellofemoral joint and its association with proximal patellar tendinitis on MRI

Authors: Dr Satyapraveen Samantula, Dr G S Kejriwal, Dr Anil Devara, Dr K Anil Kumar

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v8i2.10

Abstract

Objective: To determine variation in structure and alignment of the knee between patients with proximal patellar tendinitis (PT) and a control group, with emphasis on the patellofemoral joint on MRI.

Materials & Methods: Case group included retrospective inclusion of 25 patients with diagnosed PT on MRI. Control group included 50 patients with no radiological or clinical evidence of PT and underwent MRI of the Knee. Physically active patients and controls were matched for age and gender.

Two radiologists evaluated Knee MRIs assessing parameters such as patellar & trochlear morphology, patellofemoral & tibiofemoral alignment. Student’s t test was used to find out the differences in parameters between cases and controls. Assessment of PT and its association with MRI parameters was done using Logistic regression.

Results: Wiberg angle (Subchondral) was higher in cases than controls (139.8± 6.5 vs. 134.5 ± 7.1; p = 0.003). Insall–Salvati ratio concerning patellar height was different between cases and controls (1.29 ± 0.23 vs. 1.13 ± 0.20; p = 0.002), so does Caton–Deschamps index (1.3 ± 0.20 vs. 1.1 ± 0.30; p = 0.004). Significant association with tendinitis were found [odds ratios (CI 95%)] for patellar structure [1.1 (1.0, 1.2)] and patellar height [1.3 (1.0, 1.7)] using logistic regression.

Conclusions: Patellar tendinitis is found to be significantly associated with increased subchondral patellar wiberg angle and patellar height.

Keywords: Patellar tendinits; Patellofemoral Joint; MRI; Patella; Sinding Larsoen Johansson disease.

References

  1. Khan KM, Cook JL, Taunton JE, Bonar F. (2000) Overuse tendinosis, not tendinitis. Part 1: new paradigm for a difficult clinical problem. Phys Sportsmed. 28:38–48.
  2. Orava S, Leppilahti J. (1999) Overuse injuries of tendons inathletes. In: Jakob RP, Fulford P, Horan F, eds. EuropeanInstructional Course Lectures. London: The British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery.
  3. Orava S. (1980) Exertion injuries due to sports and physical exercise: A clinical study of nontraumatic overuse injuries of the musculoskeletal system of athletes and keepfit athletes. MD Thesis, Oulu University, Finland
  4. Martens M,Wouters P, Burssens A, Mulier JC. (1982) Patellar tendinitis: Pathology and results of treatment. ActaOrtop Scand. 53:445–450.
  5. Ferretti A, Ippolito E, Mariani P, Puddu G. Jumper’s knee. Am JSports Med. 1983;11:58–62.
  6. Stanish WD, Rubinovich RM, Curwin S. Eccentric exercise inchronic tendinitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986:65-8.
  7. Cook JL, Khan KM, Harcourt PR, Grant M, Young DA,Bonar SF. (1997) A cross sectional study of 100 athletes withjumper’s knee managed conservatively and surgically. Br JSports Med. 31:332–336.
  8. Kujala U. (1986) Knee exertion injuries in adolescents andyoung athletes. Publication of the Social Insurance Institution of Finland ML
  9. Makhsous M, Lin F, Koh JL, Nuber GW, Zhang LQ. In vivo andnoninvasive load sharing among the vasti in patellar malalignment.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:1768–75.
  10. Charles MD, Haloman S, Chen L, Ward SR, Fithian D, Afra R.Magnetic resonance imaging-based topographical differences between control and recurrent patellofemoral instability patients. AmJ Sports Med. 2013;41:374–84.
  11. Khan KM, Bonar F, Desmond PM, Cook JL, Young DA, Visentini PJ, Fehrmann MW, Kiss ZS, O’Brien PA, Harcourt PR, Dowling RJ, O’Sullivan RM, Crichton KJ, Tress BM, Wark JD. (1996) Patellar tendinosis (jumper’s knee): findings at histopathologic examination, US, and MR imaging. Victorian Institute of Sport Tendon Study Group. Radiology. 200:821–827.
  12. Fredberg U, Bolvig L. (1999) Jumper’s knee—review ofliterature. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 9(2):66–73.
  13. Almekinders LC, Vellema JH, Weinhold PS. (2002) Strain patterns in the patellar tendon and the implicationsfor patellar tendinopathy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 10(1):2–5
  14. Fredberg U, Bolvig L. (1999) Jumper’s knee—review ofliterature. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 9(2):66–73
  15. Pope CF. (1992) Radiologic evaluation of tendon injuries. Clin Sports Med. 11:579–599.
  16. Renström P, Johnson RJ. (1985) Overuse injuries in sports:a review. Sports Med. 2:316–333
  17. Witvrouw E, Bellemans J, Lysens R, Danneels L, Cambier D.Intrinsic risk factors for the development of patellar tendinitis inan athletic population. A two-year prospective study. Am J SportsMed. 2001;29:190–5.
  18. Martens M, Wouters P, Burssens A, Mulier JC. (1982) Patellar tendinitis: Pathology and results of treatment. Acta Ortop Scand. 53:445–450.
  19. Mendonca LD, Verhagen E, Bittencourt NF, Goncalves GG, Ocarino JM, Fonseca ST. Factors associated with the presence of patellar tendonabnormalities in male athletes. J Sci Med Sport.2016;19:389–94.
  20. Culvenor AG, Cook JL, Warden SJ, Crossley KM. Infrapatellar fatpad size, but not patellar alignment, is associated with patellar tendinopathy. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;21:e405–11.
  21. Charles MD, Haloman S, Chen L, Ward SR, Fithian D, Afra R. Magnetic resonance imaging-based topographical differences between control and recurrent patellofemoral instability patients. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:374–84.

Corresponding Author

Dr Satyapraveen Samantula

Post Graduate, Dept of Radiology, Maharajah’s Institute of Medical Sciences