Title: Generalised Fixed Drug Eruption: A Retrospective study from a tertiary care centre in South India

Authors: Dr Sandhya S Nair, Dr Smitha Ancy Varghese

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i10.59

Abstract

  

Introduction: Fixed drug Eruption (FDE) can occur as both localised and generalised forms, with the generalised form GFDE often requiring hospitalisation and systemic treatment.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of ten years was carried out where the case sheets of patients admitted in dermatology ward of a tertiary care centre with GFDE were reviewed. Clinical data, drug history and blood investigations were recorded. Duration of hospital stay and management given were recorded.

Results: 20 patients were diagnosed with GFDE with 10 patients with generalised non bullous FDE and 10 patients with generalised bullous FDE. Most were in the 50-60 age group. Male to female ratio was 3:2. The systemic associations included fever, eosinophilia, hepatic transaminitis and hyponatremia. Most common drug implicated was paracetamol. All the patients were treated with the withdrawal of the culprit drug and supportive measures while 75% needed additional administration of systemic steroids.

Conclusion: Though GFDE generally has a favourable outcome, hospitalisation, monitoring for systemic involvement and aggressive management may be required in severe cases.

Keywords: Fixed drug eruption, Generalised bullous fixed drug eruption.

References

  1. Sehgal VN, Srivastava G. Fixed drug eruption (FDE): changing scenario of incriminating drugs. Int J Dermatol. 2006 Aug;45(8):897-908.
  2. Daulatabadkar B, Pande S, Borkar M. Generalized bullous fixed drug reaction: A close similarity to stevens–johnson syndrome. Indian J Drugs Dermatol 2017;3:28-31.
  3. Rai R, Jain R, Kaur I, Kumar B. Multifocal bullous fixed drug eruption mimicking Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2002;68:175-6. 
  4. Lee AY. Fixed drug eruptions. Incidence, recognition, and avoidance. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2000;1:277–285.
  5. Jung JW, Cho SH, Kim KH, Min KU, Kang HR. Clinical features of fixed drug eruption at a tertiary hospital in Korea. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2014;6(5):415–420. 
  6. Sehgal VN, Gangwani OP. Fixed drug eruption. Current concepts. Int J Dermatol. 1987;26:67–74.
  7. Mitre, V., Applebaum, D. S, Albahrani, Y., & Hsu, S. (2017). Generalized bullous fixed drug eruption imitating toxic epidermal necrolysis: a case report and literature review.Dermatology Online Journal, 23(7).
  8. Panwar H, Joshi D, Goel G, Asati D, Majumdar K, Kapoor N. Diagnostic utility and pitfalls of Tzanck smear cytology in diagnosis of various cutaneous lesions. J Cytol 2017;34:179-82.
  9. Lever WF, Schamberg-Lever G. Fixed drug eruption. In: Lever WF, Schamberg-Lever G, eds. Histopathology of the Skin, 8th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 2001.
  10. Malviya N, Cyrus N, Vandergriff T, Mauskar M. Generalized bullous fixed drug eruption treated with cyclosporine. Dermatol Online J 2017;23.
  11. Beniwal R, Gupta LK, Khare AK, Mittal A, Mehta S, Balai M. Cyclosporine in generalized bullous-fixed drug eruption. Indian J Dermatol 2018;63:432-3.
  12. Lipowicz S, Sekula P, Ingen-Housz-Oro S, Liss Y, Sassolas B, Dunant A, et al.Prognosis of generalized bullous fixed drug eruption: Comparison with Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Br J Dermatol 2013;168:726-32.  
  13. Gupta R. Drugs causing fixed drug eruptions: Confirmed by provocation tests. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2003;69:120-1.
  14. Girisha BS, Noronha TM, Alva AC, Menon A. Generalized bullous fixed drug eruption mimicking toxic epidermal necrolysis caused by paracetamol. Clin Dermatol Rev 2018;2:34-7.
  15. Ayanlowo OO. Fixed drug eruption at a dermatology clinic in Lagos, Nigeria. J Clin Sci 2015;12:108-12.

Corresponding Author

Dr Smitha Ancy Varghese

Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram, India