Title: The Evaluation of Hearing Level between Workers of Cement Industry and Non- Industrial Workers

Authors: Dr Fatima Sadia, Prof. Dr Momtaz Begum, Dr Shahin Akter, Dr Mohammed Salahuddin Shahed Chowdhury

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i10.22

Abstract

  

Objective: In this study our main goal is to evaluate the hearing level between workers of cement industry and non- industrial workers.

Methodology: This Cross-sectional observational study was conducted at Department of Physiology, CHITTAGONG MEDICAL COLLEGE, Chittagong and Heidelbargh Cement Bangladesh Ltd. East Halishar, Chittagong, from January 2017 to December 2018. Where total number of 800 (Eight hundred) subjects were included. During the study, All subjects were selected purposively on the basis of noise exposure study procedure. After selection and proper counseling, the aim, objective and procedure of the study was explained in details to all subjects, in the cement industry.

Result: during the study frequency of hearing loss were 304 (50.7%) & 8 (4%) in study group and control respectively.50.7% patients in group-A had hearing loss. 4% in group-B had this problem. mean duration of employment among the cases according to hearing loss in 8.67 and for normal cases 6.30.

Conclusion: We can conclude that, the hearing loss caused by exposure to occupational noise has multiple consequences at both the individual and the social level. While various factors contribute to the occurrence of occupational noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) like age, sound level and duration of noise exposure, duration of employment and lack of preventive measures. Lack of knowledge about hearing loss and proper use of protective measures influence hearing loss in cement industries. Further study should be conducted to better outcome.

Keywords:  Hearing level, Noise induced hearing loss (NIHL).

References

  1. Kamal AA, Sayed GM, Hassan MH, Massoud AA. Usage of personal protective devices among Egyptian industrial workers. Am J Ind Med 1988,-13: 707-16.
  2. Delleman NJ, DulJ. Sewing Machine operation: workstation adjustment, working posture and workers perceptions, Int J Ind Engineering 2003;30: 341-54.
  3. Panmalam P, Kamalamma N, Gangun AK. Occupational health problems of workers in industrial units Indian J Textiles CXV 1992:63:369-72.
  4. International Labor Organization (ILO). Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety 411' Edition, Geneva. 1998; 2: 50.7 - 50.12.
  5. Simpson M, Bruce R. Noise in America: the extent of the noise problem. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1981. ERA Report No. 550/9-81-101.
  6. S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (USOOL OSHA). Noise and 1-learing Conservation, 2002.
  7. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EASI-1W). Monitoring the State of Occupational Safety and Health in the European Union - Pilot Study, Luxembourg. 2 metallurgical company. Rev Saudi Publican 2005; 39(2): 151 - 64.
  8. Patei VS, Ingle ST. Occupational noise exposure and hearing loss among pulse processing workers. Environmentalist 2008; 28:358 - 65.
  9. Mahmoud TM, EI-Megeed I-1A, El-Din MA, Ibrahim HDF. A study of occupational health hazards among assiut spinniing factory workers. Ass Univ Bull Environ Res 2004; 7(1): 63 - 70.

Corresponding Author

Dr Fatima Sadia

Lecturer, Dept. of Physiology, Chattagram Medical College, Chattagram