Title: To compare the effectiveness of Neuromuscular electrical stimulation and Electromyography biofeedback in individuals following Total Hip arthroplasty

Authors: Dr Krupa M. Soni, Dr Reji.K. Samuel

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i10.06

Abstract

  

Background: The most common complication after Total Hip Arthroplasty is reflex inhibition of quadriceps muscle leading to reduced function. The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of NMES and EMG biofeedback along with Conventional exercise program and Conventional exercise program alone in the recovery of Quadriceps muscle strength and hip function in the early phases of rehabilitation following total hip arthroplasty. 

Methods: In a 4-week intervention study, 36 patients following total hip arthroplasty were studied. They were divided in to three groups by convenience sampling, Group A: (n=12) Conventional exercise program, Group B: (n=12) NMES along with Conventional exercise program and Group C: (n=12) EMG biofeedback along with Conventional exercise program was applied. For all 3 groups, treatment consisted of 1 session/day, 5 days/week for 4 weeks. Data was collected and analyzed using SPSS16.0.

Results: A significant improvement in the strength of quadriceps muscle (p< 0.05), and increase in hip function (p < 0.05) between pre & post treatment stages in all three groups with no statistically significant (p>0.00) difference between NMES group and EMG biofeedback group were found.

Conclusion: In the experimental conditions used in this study, the use of NMES along with Conventional exercise program and EMG biofeedback along with Conventional exercise program was effective when compared to Conventional exercise program alone; NMES and EMG biofeedback was equally effective in the early phases of rehabilitation following Total hip arthroplasty.

Keywords: Total Hip Arthroplasty, Quadriceps Muscle Strength, Harris Hip Score, NMES, EMG Biofeedback.

References

  1. Alghamry S. ―Effectiveness of Physical Rehabilitation and Electro-Stimulation after Hip Joint Replacement Surgery‖. World. 2011; 4 (1): 41—47
  2. Karsten Dreinhoefer, Paul Dieppe, Sturmer Til, Dagmar Grober-Gratz, Markus Floren, Klaus-Peter Gunther, Wolfhart Puhl and Hermann Brenner.‖ Indications for total hip replacement‖ Ard.bmjjournal.jan 2006;
  3. Jan M, Hung J, Lin J, Wang S, Liu T, Tang P. ―Effects of a home program on strength, walking speed, and function after total hip replacement‖. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2004; 85 (12): 1943--1951.
  4. Okoro T, Lemmey A, Maddison P, Andrew J.‖ An appraisal of rehabilitation regimes used for improving functional outcome after total hip replacement surgery‖. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2012; 4 (1): 5.
  5. Samuel L Turek,Orthopaedics principles and their applications.4th edition.
  1. Kisner C, Colby L.Therapeutic exercises. Philadelphia:F.A.Davis;2007
  2. Husby V, Helgerud J, Bj\Orgen S, Husby O, Benum P, Hoff J. ―Early maximal strength training is an efficient treatment for patients operated with total hip arthroplasty‖. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2009; 90 (10): 1658--1667.
  3. Mcmeeken J, Galea M.‖ Impairment of muscle performance before and following total hip replacement‖. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation. 2007; 14 (2): 55--62.
  4. S.Brent Brotzman, Kevin E.Wilk. Clinical Orthopaedic rehabilitation, 2nd ed. Mosby. West Philadelphia: Pennsylvania; 2003.
  5. Vincent Gremeaux,MD,Julien Renault, MS, Laurent Pardon, MS, Gaelle Deley, PhD, Romuald Lepers, PhD, Jean-Marie Casillas,MD. ―Low-Frequency Electric Muscle Stimulation Combined with Physical Therapy after Total Hip Arthroplasty for Hip Osteoarthritis in Elderly Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial‖.Arch Phys Med Rehabil.2008: (89); 2265-73.
  6. Draper V. ―Electromyographic biofeedback and recovery of quadriceps femoris muscle function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction‖. Physical Therapy. 1990; 70 (1): 11—17.
  7. Dursun E. Biofeedback. In: JH Stone, M Blouin, editors. International Encyclopedia of Rehabilitation.2012
  8. Temfemo A, Doutrellot P, Ahmaidi S.‖ Early muscular strengthening after total hip arthroplasty: association of two models of rehabilitation‖. 2008; 51 (1):38.
  1. Sherrington C, Lord S. ―Reliability of simple portable tests of physical performance in older people after hip fracture‖. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2005; 19 (5): 496--504.
  2. Campbell orthopaedics.10th edition.
  3. Elaine Trudelle - Jackson, PT, PhD, Roger Emerson, MD,Sue Smith, PT, PhD.‖ Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Study of Patients One Year Postsurgery.‖ 2002
  4. Merly Roth Gersh. Electrotherapy in Rehabilitation.1st Indian ed. 2004. 56
  5. Bohannon RW.‖ Test-retest reliability of hand-held dynamometry during a single session of strength assessment‖. physical therapy 1986 Feb;66(2):206-9
  6. Andrews A, Thomas M, Bohannon R. ―Normative values for isometric muscle force measurements obtained with hand-held dynamometers‖. Physical therapy. 1996; 76 (3): 248--259.
  7. Nilsdotter A, Brem, Er A.‖Measures of hip function and symptoms: Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS)‖. Lequesne Index of Severity for Osteoarthritis of the Hip (LISOH), and American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) Hip and Knee Questionnaire. Arthritis care \& research. 2011; 63 (S11): 200--207.
  8. William E Prentic. Therapeutic modalittes in rehabilitation. The Mc Grae-Hill companies ;3rd ed. 2005.

Corresponding Author

Dr Krupa M. Soni

Assistant Professor, Nootan College of Physiotherapy, Sankalchand Patel University, Visnagar-384315.Gujarat