Details
Category: Volume 07 Issue 06 June 2019
Hits: 1150

Title: Comparison of the findings of gray scale sonography, colour Doppler and CT angiography in evaluation of Extracranial Carotid vascular stenosis

Authors: Dr Arnav Shandil, Dr Nikita Verma, Dr Dinesh Sood, Dr Narvir S.Chauhan,  Dr Amit Bhardwaj, Dr Raman Chauhan, Dr Ambuj Shandil

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i6.92

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Cerebrovascular disease with stroke in particular is one of the most important causes of death and the greatest cause of disability all over the world. Stenosis degree is considered the leading parameter in the choice of therapeutic options but factors other than the degree of stenosis are also important in assessing whether a carotid lesion will remain clinically silent. Ulcerated plaques are associated with a higher risk of embolism and occlusion, producing ischemic neurologic events.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of multidetector row CT angiography (MDCTA) and US-ECD in the evaluation of carotid plaque complicated by ulceration with MDCT being taken as reference standard

Methods: Total of 30 patients with symptoms pertaining to cerebrovascular disease were selected over a period of one year and plaque ulceration was evaluated and compared by both Doppler ultrasound and CT angiography.

Results: We concluded that CDUS is inferior w.r.t CTA to assess plaque morphology and especially in identification of ulceration. This can be ascribed, in part, to the fact that acoustic shadowing from calcification obscures ulcers, and the sonography probe may not be parallel to the axis of the vessel in the region of the ulceration. Sonography is limited by its accuracy and reproducibility, especially when the lesion is calcified. The recent development of 3D US and the use of CEUS may help improve the detection of carotid ulceration.

Keywords: Plaque ulceration, carotid vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, Doppler ultrasound , CT angiography

References

  1. Warlow C, Sudlow C, Dennis M, Wardlaw J, Sandercock P. Stroke. Lancet 2003;362:1211-24.
  2. Weinberger J. Diagnosis and prevention of atherosclerotic cerebral infarction. CNS Spectra 2005;10:553-64.
  3. Coll RE, Will RG. Diseases of nervous system. Davidson's Principles and Practice of medicine 1996;17:1071-78.
  4. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients high with grade stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–53.
  5. European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 1998;351:1379–87.
  6. Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Group endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 1995; 273:1421–8.
  7. Brown PB, Zwiebel WJ, Call GK. Degree of cervical carotid artery stenosis and hemispheric stroke: duplex US findings. Radiology 1989; 170:541–43.
  8. Pandya A, Gupta A, Kamel H, Navi BB, Sanelli PC, Schackman BR. Carotid artery stenosis: cost-effectiveness of assessment of cerebrovascular reserve to guide treatment of asymptomatic patients. Radiology. 2015;274(2):455-63.
  9. Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound. Consensus Conference on Carotid Ultrasound October 2002, San Farncisco. Radiology2003;229:340-6.
  10. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74.
  11. Miller ZE, Yuan C. Atherosclerotic plaque imaging techniques in magnetic resonance images. In: Suri JS, Laxminarayan S, editors. Angiography and plaque imaging, CRC Press LLC; 2003;7:199–204.
  12. Schaller BJ. Imaging of carotid artery stenosis. Verlag/Wien: Springer; 2007, p. 4.
  13. Polak JF, Bajakian RL, O'leary DH, Anderson MR, Donaldson MC, Jolesz FA. Detection of internal carotid artery stenosis: comparison of MR angiography, color Doppler sonography, and arterio-graphy. Radiology. 1992;182(1):35-40.
  14. Herzig, S. Burˇval, B. Krˇupka, I. Vlachova´, K. Urba´nek and J. Maresˇ. Comparison of ultrasongraphy, CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography in severe carotid Stenosis: European Journal of Neurology 2004,11:774 -81.
  15. Sameh Abd El Raouf, Amal Amin Abu El Maati, Nivine Chalabi. Agreement between multi-detector-row CT angiography and US-ECD in quantification of carotid artery stenosis and plaque characterization The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine 2014;45:143-150.
  16. Qureshi AI, Suri MF, Ali Z, et al. Role of conventional angiography in evaluation of patients with carotid artery stenosis demonstrated by Doppler ultrasound in general practice. Stroke. 2001;32 (10):2287-91.
  17. Eapen RP, Parikh JH and Patel NT. A study of clinical profile and risk factors of cerebrovascular stroke. Gujrat Medical Journal  2009;64:47-54.
  18. Fernandes M, Keerthiraj B, Mahale AR, Kumar A, Dudekula A. Evaluation of carotid arteries in stroke patients using color Doppler sonography: A prospective study conducted in a tertiary care hospital in South India. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2016;6(1):38-44.
  19. Papademetriou V, Narayan P, Rubins H, Collins D, Robins S. Influence of risk factors on peripheral and cerebrovascular disease in men with coronary artery disease, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and desirable low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. HIT Investigators. Department of Veterans Affairs HDL Intervention Trial. Am Heart J. 1998;136(4 Pt 1):734-40.
  20. Kasim Abdul Kasim. CT-angiography and doppler ultrasonography in atherosclerotic carotid artery disease. A comparative study. The N Iraqi J Med 2009;35-40.
  21. Giuseppe Di Gioia, Fabio M, Pietro S, Simona M, Germano Di Sciascio. Doppler-Ultrasound and computed tomography correlation for quantification of carotid stenosis. Medical Imaging & Interventional Radiology 2015;1032:1-6.

Corresponding Author

Dr Ambuj Shandil

Civil hospital Theog, Shimla, H.P. (India)