Title: Accuracy of intra-operative imprint cytology in breast tumours and lymph node swellings: Can it be a useful alternate to Frozen section

Authors: Dr Ravindran Chirukandath, Dr Venita Juliet Noronha, Dr Remani.K, Dr Sarath Krishnan

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i6.83

Abstract

Background: In the present clinical scenario, breast lumps and lymph nodes swellings are one of the most common pathologies we deal with in our surgical outpatients. With the present increasing rate of malignancies, even benign and innocent looking lumps must be treated with suspicion and care. And hence we need an investigative procedure which is accurate, simple and less time consuming and cost effective. Imprint cytology is a good procedure to assess the diagnosis of lesions and is comparable to the final histopathology report(1). It is indeed helpful to avoid a second surgery in cases where a wide excision is required because the report comes within 10-15 minutes. This in turn helps surgeons to plan further treatment

To know the accuracy of imprint smears in breast and lymph nodes in diagnosing lesions this study was conducted  and to statistically compare with routine histopathology in order to assess sensitivity and specificity of imprint diagnosis and Compare statistically it with routine histopathology tests to know sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value.

160 patients from Govt. Medical College, Thrissur, Kerala, India with breast lumps & lymphadenitis requiring excision biopsy were included in the study .It was found that In diagnosis of breast Tumours the Result of intra-operative imprint cytology had  a Sensitivity = 95.60%; Specificity = 100%; Predictive value - +ve100% & -ve 97% in Breast lumps .In diagnosis of Lymph Node Lesions the Predictive value for metastatic carcinoma Sensitivity = 100%; Specificity = 100%; Predictive value - +ve 100% & -ve 100% and Predictive value for metastatic carcinoma with a Sensitivity = 77.7%; Specificity = 100%; Predictive value - +ve 100% & -ve 91.3%.Further research in this field is planned to understand the efficacy To assess the accuracy of imprint cytology in evaluating lumpectomy margins.

Keywords: Intra-operative Imprint Cytology.

References

  1. Hiregoudar AD, Godhi AS, Malur PR, Gogeri BV, Metgud SC. Accuracy ofintra-operative imprint smears in breast tumours: A study of 40 caseswith review of literature. Indian J Surg2006;68:302-5
  2. Dudgeon LC, Patrick CV. A new method for the rapid microscopical diagnosis of tumours: With an account of 200 cases so examined. Br JSurg1927;25:250
  3. Cox CE, Ku NN, Reintgen DS, Greenberg HM, Nicosia SV, Wangensteen S. Touch preparation cytology of breast lumpectomy margins with histologic correlation. Arch Surg1991;126:490-3.    [PUBMED]
  4. Suen KC, Wood WS, Syed AA, Quenville NF, Clement PB. Role of imprint cytology in intraoperative diagnosis: value and limitations. Journal of Clinical Pathology 197831, 328-337
  5. Tribe CR. A comparison of rapid methods including imprint cytodiagnosis for the diagnosis of breast umours. Journal of Clinical PATHOLOGY 1973: 26:273-277
  6. Creager AJ, Shaw JA, Young PR, Geisinger KR. Intra-operative evaluation of lumpectomy margins by imprint cytology with histologic correlation: A community hospital experience. Arch Pathol Lab Med2002;126:846-8. [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
  7. Klimberg VS, Harms S, Korourian S. Assessing margin status. Surg Oncol 1999;8:77-84. [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
  8. Saarela AO, Paloneva TK, Rissanen TJ, Kiviniemi HO. Determinants of positive histologic margins and residual tumour after lumpectomy for early breast cancer: A prospective study with special reference to touch preparation cytology. Surg Oncol 1997;66:248-53. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]
  9. Shidham V, Gupta D, Galindo LM, Haber M, Grotkowski C, Edmonds P,et al . Intra-operative scrape cytology: Comparison with frozensections, using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. DiagnCytopathol2000;23:134-9.
  10. Creager AJ, Geisinger KR, Perrier ND, Shen P, Shaw JA, Young PR,et al . Intraoperative imprint cytologic evaluation of sentinel lymphnodes for lobular carcinoma of the breast. Ann Surg 2004;239:61
  11. Cendan JC, Coco D, Copeland EM 3rd. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section analysis of breast cancer lumpectomy bed margins. J Am Coll Surg2005;201:194-8. [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
  12. Dutta SK, Chattopadhyaya A, Roy S. Evaluation of fine needleaspiration and imprint cytology in the early diagnosis of breastlesions with histo-pathological correlation. J Indian Med Asso c2001;99:421-3.

Corresponding Author

Dr Ravindran Chirukandath

Additional Professor of Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Medical College P.O., Thrissur, Kerala State, India, Pin code- 680596