Details
Category: Volume 07 Issue 06 June 2019
Hits: 1406

Title: Correlation of Supraspinatus Tears and Tendinosis with Acromion Morphology and Acromioclavicular Arthritis Based on Conventional MRI and CT

Authors: Dr Amit Achyut Ban, Dr Mahammadhusen Taiyabali Makada, Dr Nandini Umeshkumar Bahri

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i6.21

Abstract

Background: In consideration of supraspinatus tears and tendinosis, acromion morphology forms a most important risk factor along with acromioclavicular joint arthritis. Utilisation of the pathological phenomenon caused by the acromial changes can lead to identification of etiology for supraspinatus tears and tendinosis.

Aim: To evaluate the association of supraspinatus tears and tendinosis with acromion morphology and acromio-clavicular arthritis using conventional MRI and CT.

Material and Methods: Evaluation of 100 patients with chronic shoulder pain for rotator cuff tears and correlating them with findings of acromion and acromio-clavicular joint. Dual source 16-slice Computed tomography scanner (Bright speed, GE health care, UK) and 1.5 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging system (Magnetom Essenza, Siemens health care, Germany) were used for imaging. Acromio-clavicular joint, rotator cuff pathologies and acromion types were evaluated using CT and MRI. Measurement of acromio-humeral distance was done using CT.

Results: In our study, 92% cases with acromio-clavicular joint changes showed tear/tendinosis of supraspinatus tendon. The type I and type II are more seen types in the population. However, type III acromion showed supraspinatus tears in 100% cases and type II acromion were associated with rotator cuff tears in 80% of cases. Acromio-humeral distance <7 mm was associated with 70 % supraspinatus tears and remaining 30 % had tendinosis. Acromio-humeral distance between 7-10 mm was associated with supraspinatus tears in 64 % cases.

Conclusion: Acromioclavicular arthritis and type III acromion showed strong association with supraspinatus tears and tendinosis. Reduced acromio-humeral distance was an important association of supraspinatus tears.

Keywords: Acromion types, acromioclavicular arthritis, acromio-humeral distance, supraspinatus tears, impingement, MRI.

References

  1. Mohamed RE, Abo-sheisha DM. Assessment of acromial morphology in association with rotator cuff tear using magnetic resonance imaging. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine 2014 Mar;45(l).169-180.
  2. Saupe N, Pfirrmann CWA, Schmid MR, Jost B, Werner CML, Zanetti M. Association Between Rotator Cuff Abnormalities and Reduced Acromiohumeral Distance. AJR AJR Am J Roentgenol.2006 Aug;187(2):376-382.
  3. Needell SD, Zlatkin MB, Sher JS, Murphy BJ, Uribe JW. MR imaging of the rotator cuff: peritendinous and bone abnormalities in an asymptomatic population. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Apr;166(4):863-7.
  4. Neer CS 2nd. Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1972;54(l):41-50.
  5. Jobe CM. Posterior superior glenoid impingement: expanded spectrum. Arthroscopy 1995 Oct;l l(5):530-6.
  6. Ribbans WJ, Mitchell R, Taylor GJ Computerized arthrotomography of primary anterior dislocation of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br.1990 Mar;72(2): 181-5.
  7. Ellman H. Diagnosis and treatment of incomplete rotator cuff tears. Clin OrthopRelat Res. 1990 May; (254):64-74.
  8. Snyder SJ, Pachelli AF, Del Pizzo W, Friedman MJ, Ferkel RD, Pattee G. Partial thickness rotator cuff tears: results of arthroscopic treatment. Arthroscopy 1991;7 (1):1–7.
  9. Morag Y, Jacobson JA, Miller B, De Maeseneer M, Girish G, Jamadar D. MR imaging of rotator cuff injury: what the clinician needs to know. Radiographics. 2006 Jul-Aug;26(4): 1045-65.
  10. Meister K, Thesing J, Montgomery WJ, Indelicato PA, Walczak S, Fontenot W. MR arthrography of partial thickness tears of the undersurface of the rotator cuff: an arthroscopic correlation. Skeletal Radiology. 2004 Mar; 33(3): 136-41.
  11. Zlatkin MB, Cary JH, Steven N. Shoulder anatomy. In: Zlatkin MB, editor. MRI of the shoulder, 2nd Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003.p.89 -91.
  12. Kassarjian A, Bencardino JT, Palmer WE. Radiol Clin North Am. 2006 Jul; 44(4):503-23, vii-viii.
  13. Kjellin I, Ho CP, Cervilla V, Haghighi P, Kerr R, Vangness CT et al. Alterations in supraspinatus tendon at MR imaging : correlation with histopathologic findings in cadavers. Radiology. 1991 Dec;181(3):837-41.
  14. Sein ML, Walton J, Linklater J, et al. Reliability of MRI assessment of supraspinatus tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med. 2007; 41(8):e9.
  15. Bigliani LU, Morrison DS, April EW. The morphology of the acromion and rotator cuff impingement (abstr). Orthop Trans 1986; 10:228.
  16. Morrison DS, Biglani LU. The clinical significance of variations in acromial morphology (abstr). Orthop Trans. 1987; 11:234.
  17. Ogata S, Uhthoff HK. Acromial enthesopathy and rotator cuff tear: a radiologic and histologic postmortem investigation of the coracoacromial arch. Clin OrthopRelat Res. 1990 May;(254):39-48.
  18. J D Getz, M P Recht, D W Piraino, J P Schils, B M Latimer, L M Jellema, N AObuchowski. Acromial morphology: relation to sex, age, symmetry, and subacromial enthesophytes. Radiology1996 199:3, 737-742.
  19. Ernberg, L. A., & Potter, H. G. (2003). Radiographic evaluation of the acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joints. Clinics in Sports Medicine, 22(2), 269–273.

Corresponding Author

Dr Amit Achyut Ban

Prasad Hospital, Borban Area, Behind SP office, Govardhan Ghat Road, Taluka, District, Nanded, Maharashtra – 431601, India