Details
Category: Volume 07 Issue 06 June 2019
Hits: 1345

Title: Role of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Imaging in Differentiation of Malignant and Benign Hepatic Focal Lesions

Authors: Sachin Kumaraswamy, Amarjit Kaur, Navkiran Kaur, Harnoor Momak Walia, Rohan Bains, Jebin Abraham

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i6.11

Abstract

Background: With the advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MR) technology, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) can be used in further characterization of liver lesions and differentiating malignant and benign lesions.

Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate focal hepatic lesions using Diffusion Weighted Magnetic resonance imaging and calculate apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, to determine if focal hepatic lesions could be differentiated as benign or malignant by diffusion weighted imaging and ADC maps. Histopathological correlation wherever possible.

Material and Methods: This study was carried out on 40 patients in Department of Radiodiagnosis, Government Medical College, Rajindra Hospital, Patiala. Patients with indeterminate hepatic masses found on USG abdomen and/ CT abdomen were included and MRI abdomen was conducted to characterize liver lesions and ADC values calculated using different b values = 0, 100, 500 and 750 s/mm2.ADC values of benign and malignant lesions were compared.

Results: Mean ADC values of malignant focal lesions were significantly lower than benign mass lesions: 0.87 ± 0.15 x10-3mm2/s V/s 2.66±0.80x10-3mm2/s respectively (P<0.05). The best ADC threshold value for distinguishing benign and malignant lesions was1.50 x 10-3mm2/s with Sensitivity =100 %, Specificity = 90.9%, Positive predictive value= 93.33%, Negative predictive value =100% and p value <0.05 respectively.

Conclusion: DWI and ADC can better characterize focal hepatic lesions. DWI can be used as an additional sequence to the standard protocol study and not as a unique imaging series.Since there could be substantial overlap in the range of ADCs between different pathologies, the ADC should be interpreted concurrently with all available imaging before making the radiologic diagnosis.

Keywords: DW MRI liver; Hepatic focal lesions; ADC of hepatic focal lesions; Benign and malignant lesions; ADC cut-off.

References

  1. Caraiani C, Chiorean L, Fenesan D, Lebovici A, Feier D, Gersak M, et al. Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the classification of focal liver lesions as benign or malignant. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2015;3(24):309–17.
  2. Stejskal EO, Tanner JE. Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time dependent field gradient. J ChemPhys 1965;42:288–292.
  3. Taouli B, Koh DM. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver. Radiology. 2010;254(1):47-66.
  4. KohDM, Collins DJ. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188(6):1622–35.
  5. Hori M, Ichikawa T, Sou H, Tsukamoto T, Kitamura T, Okubo T et al. Improving diffusion-weighted imaging of liver with SENSE technique: a preliminary study. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi 2003;63(4):177-79.
  6. Gudbjartsson H, Patz S. The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data. Magn Reson Med 1995;34 (6):910-14.
  7. Rao UMM, Rao L. Evaluation of focal liver lesions by magnetic resonance imaging and correlation with pathology. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2016;4(11):4659-68.
  8. Hasan NM, Zaki KF, Alam-Eldeen MH, Hamedi HR. Benign versus malignant focal liver lesions: Diagnostic value of qualitative and quantitative diffusion weighted MR imaging. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2016;47(4):1211-20.
  9. El-Badrawy A, Ashmallah GA, Tawfik AM, Abdelfattah S, Salah-Eldin M, Azmy EE et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the Benign hepatic focal lesions. Open Journal of Radiology. 2014;4(01):136-43.
  10. Turdean S, GurzuSm, Turcu M, Viodazan S, Sin A. Current data in clinicopathological characteristics of primary hepatic tumors. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2012;53(3 Suppl):719–24.
  11. Nijalingappa, Maralahalli NS. Role of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in focal liver lesions. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences 2015;14(7):10-22.
  12. Battal B, Kocaoglu M, Akgun V, Karademir I, Deveci S, Guvenc I et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in the characterization of focal liver lesions: efficacy of visual assessment. Journal of computer assisted tomography. 2011;35(3):326-31.
  13. Abdelsamed AM, Elia RZ, Hatim MU. The role of diffusion weighted MRI in the differentiation between benign and malignant hepatic focal lesion. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine 2017;68(2):1176-83.
  14. Vergara ML, Fernández M, Pereira R. Diffusion-weighted MRI characterization of solid liver lesions, Revista Chilena De Radiología, 2010;16(1):510.
  15. Jahic E, Sofic A, Selimovic AH. DWI/ADC in Differentiation of Benign from Malignant Focal Liver Lesion. Acta Informatica Medica. 2016;24(4):244-47.
  16. Miller FH, Hammond N, Siddiqi AJ, Shroff S, Khatri G, Wang Y, Merrick LB, Nikolaidis P. Utility of diffusion‐weighted MRI in distinguishing benign and malignant hepatic lesions. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2010;32 (1):138-47.
  17. Demir O., Obuz F., Sagol O., Dicle O. Contribution of diffusion-weighted MRI to the differential diagnosis of hepatic masses. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2007;13 (2):81-6.
  18. Taouli B, Vilgrain V, Dumont E, Daire JL, Fan B, Menu Y. Evaluation of liver diffusion isotropy and characterization of focal hepatic lesions with two single-shot echoplanar MR imaging sequences: prospective study in 66 patients. Radiology 2003;226(1):71–8.
  19. Namimoto T, Yamashita Y, Sumi S, Tang Y, Takahashi M. Focal liver masses: characterization with diffusion weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology. 1997;204(3):739–44.
  20. Kim T, Murakami T, Takahashi S, Hori M, Tsuda K, Nakamura H. Diffusion-weighted single-shot echoplanar MR imaging for liver disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;173(2):393–98.
  21. Parikh T, Drew SJ, Lee VS, Wong S, Hecht EM, Babb JS et al. Focal liver lesion detection and characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with standard breath-hold T2-weighted imaging. Radiology 2008;246 (3): 812–22.

Corresponding Author

Dr Sachin Kumaraswamy

Junior Resident, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India