Title: Post-operative outcomes of first 100 cases of Phacoemulsification done by beginner Surgeon

Author: Dr Rishi Gupta

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i4.191

Abstract

Purpose: To study post-operative outcomes of first 100 case of Phacoemulsification done by beginner Surgeon. 

Materials and Methods: This was retrospective, interventional study done after obtaining written informed consent from patients. Any patient having immature cataract (Grade 1, 2 and 3 nuclear sclerosis) and operated by same surgeon for phacoemulsification were included in study. Patient with brown and mature cataracts and any ocular co-morbidity were excluded. A detailed history and examination of visual acuity and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) for distance and near, anterior segment with slit lamp biomicroscope and posterior segment with direct/indirect ophthalmoscopy was done and cataract was graded. Phacoemulsification was done by stop and chop technique in all cases. Patient was examined on 1st post-operative day, 1 week post-operatively and 1.5 months post-surgery for BCVA, corneal edema, iridocyclitis, intraocular pressure (IOP) and endothelial cell count (ECC). Visual recovery, duration of full recovery, resolution of corneal edema and iridocyclitis, rise in IOP, count of endothelial cells after surgery were analyzed.

Results: All patients got BCVA ≥ 6/9 at final follow-up, no patient had residual corneal edema or iridocyclitis after 2 weeks. 1 patient developed IOP rise due to steroid response which was controlled medically. There was 12.2 % loss of ECC at final-follow up visit.

Conclusion: Stop and chop method of phacoemulsification is safe in beginner’s hands with no significant difference in long term visual outcomes, however recovery takes long time compared to experienced surgeon.

Keywords: Phacoemulsification, Beginner, Endothelial cells count.

References

  1. Durrani J. Helping the blind and the visually handicapped but not by passing the Hat around. J Pak Ophthol 1996;12(3):77.
  2. Memon SM. Prevalence and causes of blindness in Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc 1992;42:196-198.
  3. Durrani J. The land of paradoxes—where intracaps, extracaps, phaco and yes, couching coexist. J P Ophthalmol 1995;11(4):102-112.
  4. Durrani J. Have emulsifier-will do phaco. Can you spare an IOL? Pak J Ophthalomol 2000;16(4):142-143.
  5. Paul D. O’Brien, Patricia Fitzpatrick, Dara J. Kilmartin, Stephen Beatty. Risk factors for endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification surgery by a junior resident. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30:839–843.
  6. Hyung Bin Hwang, Byul Lyu, Hye Bin Yim, Na Young Lee. Endothelial Cell Loss after Phacoemulsification according to Different Anterior Chamber Depths. J Ophthalmol 2015;21:07- 16.
  7. Edelhauser HE, Ubels J. Cornea and the Sclera section 2 in Adler’s physiology of the Eye clinical application (10th edition), Paul L. Kaufman & Albert Alm (Eds), Mosby, inc 2003;47-114.
  8. Can I, Takmaz T, Cakici F, Ozgul M. Comparison of Nagahara phaco-chop and stop-and-chop phaco nucleotomy techniques. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30(3):663-668.
  9. Augustin AJ, Dick HB. Oxidative tissue damage after phaco: influence of ophthalmic viscosurgical devices. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30(2):424-427.
  10. Liu YZ, Cheng B. Phaco using burst mode. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 2004;40(4):239-242.
  11. Reuschel, H. Bogatsch, T. Barth, R. Wiedemann. Comparison of endothelial changes and power settings between torsional and longitudinal phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refractive Surg 2010;36(11):1855-1861.
  12. J. Park, H. R. Yum, M. S. Kim, A. R. Harrison, and E. C. Kim. Comparison of phaco-chop, divide-and-conquer, and stop andchop phaco techniques in micro incision coaxial cataract surgery. J Cataract Refractive Surg 2013;39(10):1463-1469

Corresponding Author

Dr Rishi Gupta

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.