Title: Study of Efficacy of the Conservative and Surgical Management of Small Ureteral Stones

Authors: Dr Aamir Afroz MBBS MS, Dr Mushtaq Ali MBBS MS, Dr.(Prof) SK Bhat MBBS MS, Dr Maham Ahmad MBBS MS, Dr Mohd Aamir MBBS MS, Dr Rahul Agrawal MBBS MS

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i4.97

Abstract

Background: Ureteric colic is one of the most painful conditions that may occur and it is often caused by stone in ureter more often in distal one third of ureter. A watchful waiting approach may be expected to produce spontaneous stone expulsion in upto 50% cases, especially if stone size is <7 mm but some complications such as urinary infection, hydronephrosis and repeat colic events may occur. endoscopic treatment with ureteroscopy (URS) and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), majority of ureteric stones can be removed without open surgery. However, these procedures are not complication free and these procedures require experience and imply high cost. On the contrary, the role of medical expulsive therapy (MET) in the treatment of this condition still unclear .The most effective treatment regimen for spontaneous stone expulsion and the control of painful symptoms has not been yet determined despite the wide spread need in clinical practice. With the availability of minimally invasive procedures like endoscopic treatment with ureteroscopy (URS) and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), majority of ureteric stones can be removed without open surgery1.

Methods: The present study was carried out as a prospective observational Study

References

  1. Gettman MT, Roehrborn CG, Caddeu JA and Pearle MS.: Management of ureteral calculi: a cost comparison and decision making analysis. J Urol, 167: 1621, 2002
  2. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 9th edition Chapter 42 epidemiology of renal calculi
  3. Dellabella M, Milanese G, Muzzonigro G. Randomized trial of the efficacy of tamsulosin, nifedipine and phloroglucinol in medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral calculi. Journal of Urology 2005; 174: 167-172.
  4. Lotan Y, Gettman MT, Roehrborn CG, Caddeu JA and Pearle MS.: Management of ureteral calculi: a cost comparison and decision making analysis. J Urol, 167: 1621, 2002
  5. Lotan Y, Gettman MT, Roehrborn CG, Caddeu JA and Pearle MS.: Management of ureteral calculi: a cost comparison and decision making analysis. J Urol, 167: 1621, 2002
  6. Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, Alken P, Buck AC, Gallucci M, Knoll T, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Sarica K, Türk C, Wolf JS Jr: 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. EurUrol2007;52:1610–1631.
  7. Yang M, Gao F, Liu H, Pang H, Zuo YP, Yong T: Prospectively estimating the recoverability of renal function after relief of unilateral urinary obstruction by measurement of renal parenchymal volume. AcadRadiol 2013;20: 401–406.
  8. Chaabane W, Praddaude F, Buleon M, Jaafar A, Vallet M, Rischmann P, Galarreta CI, Chevalier RL, Tack I: Renal functional decline and glomerulotubular injury are arrested but not restored by release of unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO). Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2013;304:F432–439.
  9. Ito K, Chen J, El Chaar M, Stern JM, Seshan SV, Khodadadian JJ, Richardson I, Hyman MJ, Vaughan ED Jr, Poppas DP, Felsen D: Renal damage progresses despite improvement of renal function after relief of unilateral ureteral obstruction in adult rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2004;287:F1283–1293.

Corresponding Author

Dr Rahul Agrawal MBBS MS