Title: Dry: which is more and why, Lasik or PRK

Authors: Dr Battula Vishnuvardhan, Dr Chaithra C.M

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i3.197

Abstract

Objective: to evaluate the severity of Dry eye(mild, moderate or severe) following laser in-situ Keratomileusis and surface ablation (photorefractive keratectomy/PRK)

Methods: Nonrandomized, prospective and comparative clinical study. A total of 40 eyes of 20 patients were divided into two groups (group X and Y). In Group X, 20 eyes were operated with Femtosecond assisted LASIK and in group Y, 20 eyes underwent surface ablation with laser epithelial removal. Dry eye was evaluated by Tear breakup time (TBUT) and Schirmer 2 tests. All patients were followed up at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively.

Results: Mean TBUT Preoperatively in LASIK patients was 14.551.81s and mean TBUT in surface ablation was 14.391.92s (p=0.291). Mean TBUT at 1week, 1 month, and 3 months in LASIK patients was 7.55 , 8.85 and 9.89seconds respectively. Whereas, Mean TBUT in surface ablation patients at 1week, 1 month and 3months was 8.99, 10.88 and 10.89seconds resp. P value was less than 0.05 between these 6 readings. Preoperative mean Schirmer values in LASIK patients was 15.19 and surface ablation patients was 15.54(p= 0.345). Mean Schirmer’s values of LASIK group at 1week, 1 month and 3 months were 10.23, 10.78 and 13.73mm respectively (p<0.05). Mean Schirmer’s in surface ablation patients was 10.82, 11.86 and 15.35mm respectively (p<0.05).

Conclusion: LASIK and surface ablation both cause Dry eye but its higher in LASIK patients.

Keywords: LASIK, photorefractive keratectomy, surface ablation, tear breakup time, Schirmer test.

References

  1. Ambro´sio R Jr, Tervo T, Wilson SE. LASIK-associated dry eye and neurotrophic epitheliopathy: pathophysiology and strategies for prevention and treatment. J Refract Surg 2008; 24:396–407
  2. Battat L, Macri A, Dursun D, Pflugfelder SC. Effects of laser in situ keratomileusis on tear production, clearance, and the ocular surface. Ophthalmology 2001; 108:1230–1235
  3. Linna TU, Vesaluoma MH, Perez-Santonja JJ, Petroll WM, Alio JL, Tervo TM. Effect of myopic LASIK on corneal sensitivity and morphology of subbasal nerves. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 393-397.
  4. Tervo K, Latvala TM, Tervo TM. Recovery of corneal innervation following photorefractive keratoablation. Arch Ophthalmol 1994; 112:1466-1470
  5. Benitez-del-Castillo JM, del Rio T, Iradier T, et al.Decrease in tear secretion and corneal sensitivity after LASIK. Cornea 2001; 20:30-32
  6. Chaidaroon W, Saenprasit N. Decreased tear secretion following myopic laser in situ keratomileusis. Chiang Mai Med Bull 2002; 41:13-19.

Corresponding Author

Dr Battula Vishnuvardhan

Department of Ophthalmology, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Bengaluru, Karnataka

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Tel No. – 07042389984