Title: A Comparative Efficacy of two Regional Techniques for Labour Analgesia:  Combined Spinal Epidural Analgesia versus Epidural Analgesia

Authors: Dr D.Kailashini, Dr P.Sudha Poornima, Dr A. Satyanarayana

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i3.175

Abstract

Background and Aim: Central Neuraxial analgesia is the most versatile method of labour analgesia and the gold standard technique for pain control in obstetrics that is currently available.  The satisfaction of birth experience is greater with neuraxial techniques. Neuraxial analgesia is the mainstay analgesic, frequently administered to women in labor.we aimed at comparing efficacy of two regional techniques for labour analgesia by combined spinal epidural analgesia versus epidural analgesia evaluating by onset of analgesia, duration of analgesia, maternal satisfication, mode of delivery, neonatal outcome, complications(maternal and fetal).

Materials and Methods: 40 parturient of ASA physical status I or II in active labor with a cervical dilatation of 3-6cm requesting labour analgesia were motivated and enrolled were divided into two groups.

Group A:Received combined spinal Epidural technique using Intrathecal dose 1ml of solution containing 1 mg of 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine + 25mcg Fentanyl .Followed by subsequent top ups on patient demand using  10ml of solution containing 0.1% Bupivacaine + 2 ug/ml of Fentanyl. Group B: Received Epidural analgesia bolus dose of 10ml solution 0.1% Bupivacaine+2mcg/ml of Fentanyl.  Intermittent top ups on patient demand using 10ml solution containing 0.1% Bupivacaine + 2 mcg/ml of Fentanyl .Onset of analgesia, Mode of delivery, Neonatal outcome, Maternal satisfaction, Complications (maternal and fetal) were assessed. pain intensity by using a numerical rating scale and motor block by using bromage scale.

Results: Eighteen parturients from CSEA had onset of analgesia in less than 5 min, twelve parturient from LEA group had Onset of analgesia between 11 to 15 min and seven parturients had onset of analgesia between 16-20min. The mean time of onset of analgesia in Group A was 5.05 ±2.25 Min. The mean time of onset of analgesia in Group B was 15.2 ± 1.93 Min. Eighteen parturients from Group had undergone normal vaginal delivery. One parturient from Group B had underwent caesarian section for different indication. One parturient from Group B had undergone delivery in instrumental mode. All the Neonates from Group A and Group B had Apgar score of at 5th min of delivery. There was no difference in neonatal outcome between two groups. Five parturients in Group A complained of Pruritis and none of the parturients in group B complained of pruritis. Two parturients from each group had Hypotension. None of the parturients in neither group had other Complications like nausea and vomiting, non progressive labor or fetal distress.

Conclusion: From the present study we conclude that both the techniques Combined spinal Epidural and Epidural for labor analgesia produce excellent analgesia. However the CSE technique had faster onset of analgesia when compared to Epidural technique. Both the technique were similar in terms of safety and efficacy.

Keywords: Labour analgesia, Combined spinal epidural analgesia, epidural analgesia.

References

  1. Maltau JM, Eielsen OV, Stokke KT. Effect of stress during labor on the concentration of cortisol and estriol in maternal plasma. Am J ObstetGynecol 1979;134:681
  2. Holdcroft A. Regional Anaesthetic Techniques. In: Principles and Practice of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Analgesia. Ch. 15. Philadelphia, PA: Black Well Science Publishers; 2000. p. 243-59.
  3. Falconer AD, Powles AB. Plasma noradrenaline levels during labour-influence of elective lumbar epidural blockade. Anaesthesiology 1982;37:16-8.
  4. Sanguol F, Fox GS, Houle GL. Effects of regional analgesia on maternal oxygen consumption during the first stage of labour. Am J ObstetGynecol 1975;121:1086-9
  5. Marx GF, Greene NM, Maternal lactate, pyruvate and excess pyruvate production during labour and delivery. Am J ObstetGynecol 1964;90:786-9
  6. Livinson G, Shnider SM, De Loremen AA, Steffenson JL. Effects of maternal hyperventilation on uterine blood flow and foetal oxygenation and acid base status. Anaesthesiology 1974;40:340-7.
  7. T Chia, Y & Arulkumaran, Sabaratnam & Chua, Soo & S Ratnam, S. (1990). Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulator for Pain Relief in Labour. Asia-Oceania journal of obstetrics and gynaecology / AOFOG. 16. 145-51. 10.1111/j.1447-0756.1990.tb00017.x.
  8. Hawkins JL. Epidural analgesia for Labour and delivery. N Engl J Med 2010;362: 1503-10.
  9. Jung H, Kwak KH. Neuraxial analgesia: a review of its effects on the outcome and duration of labor. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013;65(5):379-84.
  10. Hitzeman N, Chin S. Epidural analgesia for labor pain. Am Fam Physician. 2012;86(3):241-2.
  11. Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Jones L. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011(12):Cd000331.
  12. Norris MC, Fogel ST, Conway-Long C. Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural labor analgesia. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:913-20.
  13. Hepner DL, Gaiser RR,Cheek TG and Gutsche BB. Comparision of combined spinal epidural and low dose epidural for labour analgesia .Can Anesth,2000 47:3;232-6.

Corresponding Author

Dr D.Kailashini

Department of Anesthesiology, Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam, India