Title: A Study of the Ossification of Anterior Sacroilac Ligament

Authors: Dr K. Parthiban, Dr K.Vidulatha

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i3.16

Abstract

Background: The sacroiliac joints are the largest axial joints in the body formed by the articulation of the innominate bones on the either side with the sacrum.  These joints are huge and highly specialized as they play a pivotal role in the transmission of the entire weight of the upper part of the body to the lower limbs through the sacrum and the in nominal bones. The stability of the joints depends upon bony factors, bridges of depression in the auricular surfaces, the strong ligaments which connect the auricular surfaces, and the muscles which surround the joint.  The ligaments which surround the joint may at times get ossified producing a variety of clinical conditions which may cause concern to physicians, neurologists and orthopaedician.

Keywords: Bony ankylosis, sacroiliac ligament innominate bone, ossification.

References

  1. Standring, S. Gray’s Anatomy: anatomical basis of clinical practice. 39th ed. London: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, 2005. p. 1428-1442.
  2. HollinsheadFunctional Aanatomy of the Limbs and Back.  Philadelphia, Pa, USA: W.B. Saunders; 1969.
  3. Sacroiliac Joint a review: Tilvawala K, Kothari K, Patel R. www.indian pain.org/article asp? Issn.0970-5333;year 2018;volume-32.
  4. Collins D.H: The pathology of articular and spinal diseases. Edward Arnold & Co., London,p.316,1949.
  5. AVleemingM D SchuenkeA.The sacroiliac joint: an overview of its anatomy, function and potential clinical implications. J Anat. 2012 Dec; 221(6): 537–567. Published online 2012 Sep 19. doi:  1111/j.1469-7580.2012. 01564. PMCID: PMC 3512279 PMID: 22994881
  6. SINGH, R Ossification of anterior sacroiliac ligament and its clinical significance Journal of morphological sciences 32(4):267-268.Jan 2015 DOI:10.4322/JMS 065213
  7. SHARMILA, B. and SANKAR, KD. Bilateral ankylosis of sacroiliac joint with ossified sacrospinous, sacrotuberous and transverse acetabular ligaments. Int J of Anat Variations, 2011, vol. 4, p. 123-127.
  8. BROOKE, R. The sacroiliac joint. Journal of Anatomy, 1924, vol. 58, n. Pt 4, p. 299-305. PMid:17104023.
  9. PUHAKKA, KB., MELSEN, F., JURIK, AG., BOEL, LW., VESTERBY, A. and EGUND, N. MR imaging of the normal sacroiliac joint with correlation to histology. Skeletal Radiology, 2004, vol. 33, n. 1, p. 15-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-003-0691-4. PMid:14614576.
  10. MacDonald GR, Hunt TE. Sacroiliac joints; observations on the gross and histological changes in the various age groups. Canadian Medical Association journal. 1952; 66(2):157–163. [PMC free article][PubMed]
  11. MCGLONE, BS., HAMILTON, S. and FITZ GERALD, MJ. Pelvic digit: an uncommon developmental anomaly. European Radiology, 2000, vol. 10, n. 1, p. 89-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003300050010. PMid:10663721.
  12. GOYEN et al, The pelvic digit: a rare development anomaly, a care report with CT correlation and review of the literature. ActaRadiologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2000, vol. 41, n. 4, p. 317-319. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/028418500127345569. PMid:10937749.
  13. Takeshi Imamura et al, Characterization of Individuals with Sacroiliac Joint Bridging in a Skeletal Population: Analysis of Degenerative Changes in Spinal Vertebrae. BioMed Research International ,Volume 2014, Article ID 879645, 9 pages, http://dx.doi. org/10. 1155/2014/ 879645.

Corresponding Author

Dr K. Parthiban

Associate Professor, Institute of Anatomy, Madurai Medical College, Madurai