Title: A Study on Clinical and Laboratory Findings in Early Neonatal Sepsis in Tertiary Care Hospital

Authors: Dr Lavanya Bai Munavath, Dr Sravan Kumar Kusuma, Dr Attada Ajay Kumar

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i2.182

Abstract

Introduction: Neonatal sepsis is a clinical syndrome of bacteremia with systemic signs and symptoms of infection within the first 28 days of life .It is caused by the microorganisms or their toxic products in the circulation. It is further classified as early onset (within 72 hrs of life) EOS and late onset (LOS). EOS is more common than LOS in which the EOS causes a mortality rate of 15-40% of total 30-50% of neonatal sepsis.

Materials & Methods: A descriptive study  of 200 neonates were included in the study, conducted in King George Hospital, department of pediatrics, Visakhapatnam from January 2018 to July 2018.100 term and 100 preterm neonates with clinically suspected were selected by using New Ballard score as gestational age assessment, all neonates are evaluated with detailed history of mother and perinatal events and bacteriological profile in these 200 neonates studied by various types of culture and compared with serum samples.

Results: Premature rupture of membranes and meconium stained amniotic fluid are common antenatal complications, Respiratory distress is the most common clinical presentation seen in 52% of cases with preterm significance. CRP is the rapid diagnostic test has high sensitivity in both preterm and term neonates.

References

  1. Gerdes JS. Clinicopathologic approach to the diagnosis of neonatal sepsisclin Perinatol. 199; 18:pp361–81.
  2. Stoll BJ, Gordon T, Korones SB, et al. Early-onset sepsis in very low birthweight neonates: a report from the National Institute of Child Health andHuman Development Neonatal Research Network. J Pediatr. 1996; 129:pp72–80.
  3. Lanari M, Lazzarotto T, Pignatelli S, Guerra B, Serra L., Epidemiology ofneonatal infections. J Chemother.2007 Oct; 19 Suppl 2:20-3.
  4. Elizabeth Mathai, Usha Christopher, Matthews Mathai, et al. Is C-reactiveprotein level useful in differentiating infected from uninfected neonates amongthose at risk of infection? Indian pediatrics, 2004, 41(9):895–900.
  5. Bacterial etiology of serious infections in young infants in developing countries: results of a multicenter study. The WHO Young Infants StudyGroup: Pediatric infectious disease journal, 1999; 18(10 Suppl.):ppS17-22.
  6. Gershon: Krugman's infectious diseases of children, (11th edn). Chapter 31,Morven S. Edwards Carol J. Baker, sepsis in the newborn. Mosby publication,1998.
  7. National Neonatal-Perinatal Database- 2002-2003. AIIMS, New Delhi, for National Neonatology Forum NNPD Network,India. Site:www.newbornwhocc.org.
  8. Chacko B, Sohi I. Early onset neonatal sepsis. Indian J Pediatr 2005; 72(1):23-6.
  9. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics, Infections of the neonatal infant -pathogenesis and epidemiology, 18th edn, vol. 1, Elsevier Publication,Singapore2008 109 (1): 794.
  10. Sedigheh Borna, Hajieh Borna, Soghrakhazardoost, Sedigheh Hantoushzadeh: Perinatal outcome in preterm premature rupture of membranes with Amnioticfluid index < 5 (AFI < 5), BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2004, 4:15.
  11. Bradford D. Gessner, Louisa Castrodale, Montse Soriano-Gabarro, Etiologiesand Risk Factors for Neonatal Sepsis and Pneumonia Mortality among Alaskan Infants. Bulletin 2003: Volume No.7 (5).
  12. The registrar general. Infant mortality rates 1984, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi. Indian J Pediatr, 1986; 53 (6): 671-683.
  13. Shah GS, Budhathoki S, Das BK, Mandal RN, Risk factors in early neonatalsepsis, Kathmandu University Medical Journal, 2006; 4,(2)14, pp 187-91.

Corresponding Author

Dr Sravan Kumar Kusuma

Postgraduate, Department of Pediatrics, Andhra Medical College