Details
Category: Volume 07 Issue 02 February 2019
Hits: 1045

Title: Study of Prevalence and Outcomes of Rupture Uterus in- A Tertiary Care Centre of Muzaffarpur, Bihar: A three years Retrospective Study

Authors: Amrita Pritam­­­­­­­­, Pallawi Singh, Sanjeev Kumar

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i2.113

Abstract

Objective: Uterine rupture is associated with both fetal and maternal clinical manifestations. Uterine rupture is one of the most dreaded complications of childbirth with potentially grave consequences to the mother and the fetus. Most of the complications and mortalities due to this can be prevented through measures like universal access to antenatal care, institutional deliveries and an effective system of referral. The aim of present study was to calculate prevalence of rupture uterus, to study the associated demographic factors and to analyze the various aspects of rupture uterus at our hospital.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was carried out to calculate the prevalence, to study the associated demographic factors and outcomes of rupture uterus. Analysis of cases of rupture uterus was done regarding relevant history, intra-operative findings and post operative morbidities and overall mortalities due to rupture uterus. The study was done  in Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology at S. K. Medical College, Muzaffarpur, Bihar for study period of three years from January 2015 to December 2017.  Data regarding cases of rupture uterus was collected, analyzed and interpreted. 

Results: In our study, for the period of three years from January 2015 to December 2017, total of 27,034 deliveries were conducted. Amongst them 4,732 caesarean sections were performed. Total 35 cases diagnosed as rupture uterus. The prevalence of rupture uterus in our study is 2.5 in 2000 deliveries. Most of the cases were in the age group of 20-30 years (60%). 27 cases (77.14%) were unbooked cases. Most of the cases were of scar rupture (48.57%).

Conclusion: This study has shown higher value of prevalence of rupture uterus as most cases referred were in very critical situation and terminal status of illness. Early detection of high risk pregnancies can save a lot of maternal lives. Referral system should be sound and available round the clock at every level of health care delivery system.

Keywords: Hysterectomy, Referral system, Rupture uterus, Scar rupture.

References

  1. Howkins & Bourne Shaws Textbook of Gynaecology.16th edn. New Delhi:Reed Elsevier India Private Ltd 2015:p.203.
  2. Williams OBSTERTRICS. 24th edn. USA: McGraw-Hill Education 2014:p.617
  3. Berg CJ, Callaghan WM, Syverson C, et al: Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 1998-2005. Obstet Gynecol 116(6):1302,2010
  4. Spong CY, Landon MB, Gilbert S, et al: Risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome at term after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 110:801, 2007
  5. Chatterjee SR, Bhaduri S: Clinical analysis of 40 cases of uterine rupture at Durgapur Subdivisional Hospital: an observational study. J Indian Med Assoc 105:510, 2007
  6. G. Nahum, Pham krystle Quynh. Uterine rupture in pregnancy, e medicine obstetrics and Gynecology. http://emedicine. Medscape.com/article/275854-overview
  7. Sahu LA. 10 year analysis of uterine rupture at a teaching institution. J Obstet Gynecol India.2006;56(6):502-6.
  8. Justus Hoffmeyr, L. Say and Metin Gülmezoglu. A. Systematic review: WHO systematic review of Maternal mortality and morbidity: the prevalence of uterine rupture. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 112, 2005, 1221–1228.
  9. C. Dutta’s Textbook of OBSTETRICS.7TH edn. Kolkata: New Central Book Agency (P) Ltd:p.426
  10. Mahbuba, Alam IP. Uterine rupture - experience of 30 cases at Faridpur Medical college Hospital. Faridpur Med Coll J. 2012;7(2):79-81.
  11. Porreco RP, Clark SL, Belfort MA, et al: The changing specter of uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200(3):269.e1,2009
  12. Staven G, Gabba MD. Obstetrics normal and problem solving. 5th England; McGraw-Hill Company. 2005.
  13. Malik HS. Frequency, predisposing factors and fetomaternal outcome in uterine rupture. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2006; 16: 472-475.
  14. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. Prior cesarean delivery. In: Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY, editors. New York: McGraw-Hill. 2010.
  15. Rashmi, .G Radhakrisknan, N.B. Vaid, N. Agarwal. Rupture uterus--changing Indian scenario., J Indian Med Assoc. 99(11), 2001,634 – 7
  16. Diab AE. Uterine rupture in Yemen. Saudi Medical Journal. 2005;26(2):264-9.
  17. Ezechi OC, Mabayoje P, Obsiesie LO. Rupture uterus in South Western Nigeria: a reappraisal. Singapore Med J. 2004;45:113-6.
  18. Sunanda N et al. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;5(11):3983-3986.

Corresponding Author

Amrita Pritam­­­­­­­­

Senior Resident, Dept of Obs & Gynae, Sri Krishna Medical College & Hospital, Muzaffarpur, Bihar