Details
Category: Volume 07 Issue 01 January 2019
Hits: 1172

Title: Epidemiology of Perforated Peptic Ulcer – A Regional Study

Authors: Dr Dinesh Singh Chauhan, Dr Sanjay Kumar Bhasin

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i1.98

Abstract

 

Background: Perforated peptic ulcer is a serious complication of peptic ulcer disease and patients with perforated peptic ulcer often present with acute abdomen that carries high risk for morbidity and mortality.

Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted at Government Medical College Jammu on seventy eight patients who underwent surgery for benign perforated peptic ulcer from November 2013 to December 2014. Data from 78 patients was retrieved, compiled, summarised and analysed statistically using frequency distribution and percentage proportion..

Results: Seventy eight patients were included in the study. There were 25 (32.05%) patients in 5th decade and 17 (21.79%) patients in 4th decade with a male to female ratio of 38:1. The condition among Hindu patients was (75.64%) as compared to Muslims (24.35%) and majority of the patients were illiterate (71.79%) with low socioeconomic status (94.87%) and belonged to rural setup (55.13%). Patients with O positive blood group were most affected (38.46%) followed by B positive blood group (30.76%). 29.49% patients were taking NSAIDS for musculoskeletal pain.  Out of 78 patients 64 patients (82.05%) were smokers, 40 patients (51.28%) used to consume alcohol, 37 patients (47.43%) used to both drink and smoke.

Conclusions: It is concluded that in this region of the country perforated peptic ulcer is more common in Hindu males in their fourth and fifth decade, belonging to a low socioeconomic status, residing in rural areas and have habit of both smoking and drinking.

Keywords: Perforated peptic ulcer, Helicobacter pylori, Omentopexy.

References

  1. Zittel TT, Jehle EC, Becker HD. Surgical management of peptic ulcer disease today: indication, technique and outcome. Langenbecks Archives of Surgery 2000; 385:84–96.
  2. Schein M. To drain or not to drain? The role of drainage in the contaminated and infected abdomen: an international and personal perspective. World Journal of Surgery 2008; 32:312–321.
  3. Rayner HH. Treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. Lancet 1930; ii:107–108
  4. Ramakrishnan K, Salinas RC. Peptic ulcer disease. American Family Physician 2007; 76:1005–1012.
  5. Sivri B. Trends in peptic ulcer pharmacotherapy. Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology 2004; 18:23–31.
  6. Lagoo S, McMahon RL, Kakihara M, Pappas TN, Eubanks S. The sixth decision regarding perforated duodenal ulcer. Journal of the Society of Laparoendo-scopic Surgeons 2002; 6: 359–368.
  7. Lunevicius R, Morkevicius M. Systematic review comparing laparoscopic and open repair for perforated peptic ulcer. British Journal of Surgery 2005; 92:1195–1207.
  8. Ahmed N. 23 years of the discovery of Helicobacter pylori: is the debate over? Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials 2005; 4:17.
  9. Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O’Morain C, et al Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastricht III Consensus Report. Gut. 2007 Jun; 56(6):772-81. Epub 2006 Dec 14
  10. Subedi SK, Afaq A, Adhikary S, Niraula SR, Agrawal CS. Factor’s influencing mortality in perforated duodenal ulcer following emergency surgical repair. Journal of Nepal Medical Association 2007; 46: 31-5.
  1. Aijaz A. Memon, Afsar Ali Bhutto, Ghulam Shabir Shaikh, Amanullah Jokhio and Quratul-ain Soomro. Journal of Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences (JLUMHS) 2009; 08 No.0
  2. Rigopoulos. A, Ramboiu.P, Georgescu. I. A critical evaluation of surgical treatment of perforated peptic ulcer 2011; 37:2
  3. Kassim Trayem Hayef and Adnan Yassin Abdul Wahab: Basrah Journal of Surgery 2011; 17.
  4. Gabriel R Nzarubara: African Health Sciences 2005; 5: 73-78.
  5. Moshe Schien: Schein common sense emergency abdominal surgery 2009; 157-166.
  6. N Gujar,P Chougule,S Bhosale, H Mane, S Paighan, V Balachandran  Long-Term Results Of Simple Closure Of Perforated Duodenal Ulcer In The Era Of Proton Pump Inhibitor And Anti-H.Pylori Therapy The Internet Journal of Surgery. 2012 Volume 28 Number 3.
  7.  Koo Jarley, Ngam Y.K. and Lam S.K. Aetiology of peptic ulcer. Ann   Acad Med Singapore. 1983 Oct; 12(4):498-506
  8. KJ Sondashi, BFK Odimba, P Kelly A Cross-sectional Study on Factors Associated With Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease in Adults Presenting to UTH, Lusaka Medical Journal of Zambia - Vol 38, No 2 (2011)
  1. Murtaza A, Daksha S. Perforated Duodenal Ulcer Emergency Pattern Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil University 2014; 7: 1-2
  2. Canoy DS, Hart AR, Todd CJ. Digestive and Liver Disease. 2002; 34:322-7.
  3. Fawaz Chikh Torab, Mohamed Amer, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan, Frank James Branicki. Asian Journal of Surgery 2009; 32: 95–101.

Corresponding Author

Dr. Dinesh Singh Chauhan

Department of Surgery, Government Doon Medical College, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India

Phone (or Mobile) No.: +917579016317, Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.