Details
Category: Volume 06 Issue 12 December 2018
Hits: 903

Title: Role of Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography Imaging in Assessment of Unstable Angina

Authors: Mohamed K. Saleh, Rawheya Taha Hassan, Mohamed Taha Abd El-Hakk

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i12.139

Abstract

Objectives: We sought to evaluate the role of non-invasive Multidetector computed tomography angiography (CTA) in the assessment of the causes of unstable angina.

Background: Detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) using invasive coronary angiography needs extended time, contrast load, and high radiation exposure.

Methods: 160 slices CTA was performed in 50 patients (38 men, mean age 55.48 ± 10.88years) symptomatic patients diagnosed as unstable angina. In this study, the mean coronary artery calcium score (CACS) was 204. Statistically higher CAC was found in patients ≥ 60 years old than those < 60 years. Female patients, hypertensives and diabetic patients show slightly higher (but not significant) level of CAC. Among 50 patients complaining of unstable angina we found 11 patients having normal CTA, four having dense coronary calcification, 21 having non-significant obstructive lesions, and 14 patients having significant CAD. We found significant relation between calcium score and the significance of CAD. We detected 70 plaques (29 of them caused significant stenosis) distributed in all coronary arteries. The most commonly affected artery was the LAD, followed by LCX then RCA and the small branches had only 14 plaques. According to the type of plaques, 45 plaques were mixed, five plaques were calcified and the last 20 were soft plaques. We found no significant difference in the significance of stenosis was detected in relation to the number of vessels affected.

Patients were classified into Low, Intermediate, and High probability of CAD. We found significant relation between the pre-test probability and the significance of CAD.

Conclusions: Multi-detector CTA allows accurate non-invasive assessment of patients presented with unstable angina.

References

  1. Sun ZH, Liu YP, Zhou DJ and Qi Use of coronary CT angiography in the diagnosis of patients with suspected coronary artery disease: findings and clinical indications.J Geriatr Cardiol. 2012 Jun; 9(2): 115–122.
  2. Tavakol M,Ashraf S and Brener Risks and Complications of Coronary Angiography: A Comprehensive Review. Glob J Health Sci. 2012 Jan; 4(1): 65–93.
  3. Gouya H, Varenne O, Trinquart L, Touze E, Vignaux O, Spaulding C, et al. Coronary Artery Stenosis in High-risk Patients: 64 –Section CT and Coronary Angiography—Prospective Study and Analysis of Discordance1. Radiology. 2009; 252 (2): 37-85.
  4. Sun Multislice CT angiography in coronary artery disease: Technical developments, radiation dose and diagnostic value. World J Cardiol. 2010; 2(10): 333–343.
  5. De Filippo M and Capasso Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in the assessment of patients presenting with chest pain suspected for acute coronary syndrome. Ann Transl Med. 2016 Jul; 4(13): 255.
  6. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr., Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am CollCardiol. 1990;15:827–32.
  7. Rutten A, Isgum I, Prokop M: Coronary calcification: effect of small variation of scan starting position on Agatston, volume, and mass scores. Radiology.2008;246:90–8.
  8. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A, Flohr T, Ohnesorge B, Bruder H, et al. Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography: initial experience. Eur J Radiol 2006; 57: 331-5.
  9. Cademartiri F, Nieman K, van der Lugt A, Raaijmakers RH, Mollet N, Pattynama PM, et al. Intravenous contrast material administration at 16-detector row helical CT coronary angiography: test bolus versus bolus-tracking technique. Radiology 2004; 233: 817-23.
  10. Flohr TG, Schaller S, Stierstorfer K, Bruder H, Ohnesorge BM, and Schoepf UJ. Multi– detector row CT systems and image-reconstruction techniques. Radiology 2005;235:756 –773.
  11. Weustink AC, Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, Otsuka M, Pugliese F, Mieghem C, et al. Reliable high-speed coronary computed tomography in symptomatic patients. J Am CollCardiol 2007; 50: 786-94.
  12. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am CollCardiol. 2008;52:1724–32.
  13. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Arbab-Zadeh A, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359:2324–36.
  14. Achenbach S, Moselewski F, Ropers D, Ferencik M, Hoffmann U, MacNeill B, et al. Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: a segment-based comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 2004;109:14–7.
  15. Meijs MFL, Meijboom WB, Prokop M, et al. Is there a role for CT coronary angiography in patients with symptomatic angina? Effect of coronary calcium score on identification of stenosis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009; 25:847–854.
  16. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359:2324–36.
  17. Niazi GM, Elia RZ. Role of multi-slice CT coronary angiography in evaluating the different patterns of coronary artery disease in patients with unstable angina. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2015; 46: 605–14.
  18. Chu Z, Yang Z, Dong Z, et al. Characteristics of coronary artery disease in symptomatic type 2 diabetic patients: evaluation with CT angiography. Cardiovascular Diabetology 2010; 9:74-82.
  19. Dedic A, Genders TSS, Ferket BS, et al. Stable Angina Pectoris: Head-to-Head Comparison of Prognostic Value of Cardiac CT and Exercise Testing 1. Radiology. 2011; 261 (2): 428-36.
  20. Newby DE, Williams MC, Flapan AD, et al. Role of multidetector computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of patients attending the rapid access chest pain clinic, The Scottish computed tomography of the heart (SCOT-HEART) trial: study protocol for randomized controlled trial. Trials 2012, 13:184.
  21. Zeina AR, Barmeir E, Zaid G, Odeh M. Coronary artery disease among hypertensive patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2009;10(3):252–6.
  22. Otaki Y, Gransar H, Berman DS, et al. Impact of family history of coronary artery disease in young individuals (from the CONFIRM registry). Am J Cardiol 2013;111(8):1081–6.
  23. Villines TC, Hulten EA, Shaw LJ, et al. Prevalence and severity of coronary artery disease and adverse events among sympt-omatic with coronary artery calcification scores of zero undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography. J Am CollCardiol 2011;58(24):2533–40.
  24. Hanifehpour R, Motevalli M, Ghanaati H, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Calcium Score Less than 100 in Excluding Coronary Artery Disease. Iran J Radiol. 2016; 13(2):e16705.
  25. Koulaouzidis G, Powell A, McArthur T, et al. Computed tomography coronary angiography as initial work-up for unstable angina pectoris. Eur J Gen Med 2012;9(2):111–7.
  26. Madhok R, Aggarwal A. Comparison of 128-Slice Dual Source CT Coronary Angiography with Invasive Coronary Angiography. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2014;8(6): RC08-RC11.
  27. Meijboom WB, van Mieghem CAG, Mollet NR, et al. 64-Slice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography in Patients With High, Intermediate, or Low Pretest Probability of Significant Coronary Artery Disease. JACC.2007; 50 (15): 1469–75.

Corresponding Author

Mohamed K. Saleh

Radio diagnosis and intervention Department, Faculty of medicine for girls,

Al-Azhar University