Title: Study of Fingerprint Patterns among Medical Students in IGIMS, Patna, Bihar

Authors: Aman Kumar, Mukesh Prasad, Sanjeev Kumar, Pinki Kumari, Nikhil Goel

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i12.125

Abstract

Objectives: To know the distribution of fingerprint patterns on different digits in males and females.

Methods: In this cross - sectional study, 4000 rolled fingerprints taken from 400 medical students among which 200 were males and 200 were females, were studied. All healthy individuals with no history of any genetic disorders and skin disorders were included in the study. The present study evaluates the distribution of dermatoglyphic fingertip patterns in both hands among males and females and the findings of the study are compared with the available data.

Results: Out of the 4000 fingerprint patterns studied, Loops (57.2%) were the most common pattern followed by whorls (38.3%) and arches (4.5%) being the least common pattern. Loops were the most common patterns on the index, middle and little fingers, predominance of whorls was seen on thumb and ring fingers. Arches were seen most commonly (10%) in Index finger. Arches were higher on index fingers of males (17%) when compared to females (10%). In males, whorls, loops and arches were 39.6 %, 55.2% and 5.2% respectively while in females whorls were 38.2 %, loops 57% and arches were 4.8 %.

Conclusions: Frequency of distribution of dermatoglyphic patterns among Undergraduate Medical students differs from other population groups. Frequency of loops is comparatively lower while that of whorls higher. Bilateral variations and gender based differences could not be established. Similar studies in other population groups are recommended for better correlation.

Keywords: Fingerprint, Loops, Whorls, Arches, Ectoderm, Dermatoglyphic.

References

  1. Cummins H and Midlo. Palmar and plantar epidermal configurations (dermatoglyphics) in European Americans. Am.J. Phys Anthopol, 1926; 9:471-502.
  2. Cummins H. and Midlow C. Fingerprints Palms and Soles, an introduction to Dermatoglyphics. 1961, Newyork, Dover Publication.
  3. Variend S. Fetal, perinatal and infant autopsies. In: Cotton DWK, Cros_ The Hospital Autopsy. Jaypee Brothers New Delhi, India 1994 Pg 99-115.
  4. Cummins H. Palmar and Plantar Epidermal Ridge Configuration (Dermatoglyphics) in Europeans and Americans. Am. J. Phy. Anthrop. 1926;179:741-802.
  5. Galton F. Finger Prints. London:Mc. Millan and Co. 1892.
  6. Kulkarni PR, Gaikwad KK, Inamdar W, Devarshi DB, Tungikar SL, Kulkarni S. Dermatoglyphics in Congenital Talipes Equino Varus. Journal of Anatomical Society of India 2006; 55(1): 50-51.
  7. Babu SS, Powar BP, Khare ON. Palmer Dermatoglyphics in Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Journal of Anatomical Society of India 2005; 54(2): 64-66.
  8. Nandy A. Identification of an individual In: Principles of Forensic Medicine. New Central Book Agency (P) Ltd. Calcutta. 2nd ed. (Reprint);2001:48- 111.
  9. Babler W. Embryonic development of epidermal ridges and their configurations. In: Platocc, Garruto RM, Schaumann BA, editors; Dermaoglyphics: Science in Transition Birth defects. Original article series; Wiley-liss, New York,1991;vol 27: pp.95-112.
  10. Van O el CJ, Baare WF, Hulshof POT HE, Haag J, Balazs J, Dingemans A et al. Differentiating between low and high susceptibility to Schizophrenic in twins: the significance of dermatologlyphic indices in relation to other determinants of brain development. Schizophr Res 2001;52:181-93.
  11. Bharadwaja A, Saraswat PK, Aggarwal SK, Banerji P, Bharadwaja S. Pattern of Finger-Prints in different ABO blood groups. Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine 2004; 26(1): 6-9.
  12. Rao BN, Padmini MP, Malleshwari. Survey on frequency of dermatoglyphic related personal attributes involving medical students of MIMS. Journal of Anatomical Society of India 2006; 55(1):84 [Abstract].
  13. Kanchan, Saurabh C. Distribution of fingerprint patterns among Medical students. JIAFM, 2006: 28(2):65-68.
  14. Amit A M and Anjulika A M. Study of fingerprint patterns among medical students in Vidarbha region, India. Int J Anat Res 2015;3(2):1043-1045.
  15. lgbigbi PS, Msamati BC. Palmar and digital dermatoglyphics of indigenous black Zimbaweans. Medical Science Monitor 2002; 8(11): CR757-761.

Corresponding Author

Mukesh Prasad

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.