Details
Category: Volume 06 Issue 12 December 2018
Hits: 1492

Title: A Study on Fetomaternal Outcome of Breech Presentation in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Authors: Ratna Panda, Pratibha Jena

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i12.114

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to find out the incidence, maternal and fetal outcome of breech presentation in a tertiary care hospital.

Methods: The present retrospective study was carried out in the department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of IMS & SUM HOSPITAL, Bhubaneswar, Odisha from March 2016 to April 2018. Total 97 cases were included in this study. The demographic data like age, parity, gestational age, mode of delivery, maternal and perinatal outcome were noted from hospital records and studied.

Results: The incidence of breech was found to be 2.6% in patients attending the IMS & SUM HOSPITAL. 47 % cases were in the age group of 20-25 years and 28% were in age group of 26-30 years. In the present study, primigravidas constitute 52%of cases. Most of the cases were delivered by caesarean section (88%) which were associated with PIH, oligohydramnious and PROM. Perinatal morbidity was seen to be higher in babies delivered vaginally (63%) as compared to 16 % in cases delivered by caesarean section.

Conclusion: Breech presentation is associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcome. Caesarean section does not totally eliminate the associated maternal and perinatal morbidity. The mode of delivery in breech presentation should be specified based on type of breech, stage of labour, fetal wellbeing and availability of skilled obstetrician.

Keywords: Breech presentation, caesarean section, maternal and perinatal outcome, mode of delivery.

References

  1. Dars S, Malik S, Bhurgri A. Is breech still being delivered vaginally? A comparative study. Int JReprod Contracep Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;3(1):144- 8
  2. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned Cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2000; 356:1375–83
  3. Bin YS, Roberts CL, Ford JB, Nicholl MC. Outcomes of breech birth by mode of delivery: a population linkage study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2016 Oct 1;56(5):453-9.
  4. Goffinet F, Carayol M, Foidart JM et al. (2006) ‘PREMODA Study Group. Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium’. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 194:1002-11.
  5. Impey LWM, Murphy DJ, Griffiths M, Penna LK on behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Management of Breech Presentation. BJOG 2017; 124: e151–e177
  6. Singh A, Mishra N, Dewangan R. Delivery in breech presentation: the decision making. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012;62(4):401-5
  7. Nkwabong, E. et al., 2012. Outcome of Breech Deliveries in Cameroonian Nulliparous Women. J Obstet Gynecol India The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 62(5), 531–535.
  8. Abduljabbar HS, Fetyani DM, Sait HK, Almagrabi FJ, Alsaggaf AE. Breech presentation: prevalence, outcome, review of 512 cases of breech. ARC J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;1(2):2-6.
  9. Kothapally K, Uppu A, Gillella V. Study of the obstetric outcome of breech presentation in pregnancy in a tertiary hospital in a rural area in Telangana, India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2017;6:2040-3.
  10. Gaikwad S, Rokade R. Study of maternal and perinatal outcome of breech in vaginal and operative delivery in a university hospital. Int Med J. 2014;1(6):252-8.
  11. Mostello D, Chang JJ, Bai F, Wang J. Breech presentation at delivery, a marker for congenital anomaly. J Perinatol. 2014;34(11-15)
  12. Elie N, Nelson FJ, Luc K, Chanchu NP. Outcome of breech deliveries in Cameroonian nulliparous women. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012,62(5):531-5
  13. Sanjivani, Wanjani A. Breech delivery a changing scenario. Int J Reprod Contracep Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;2:384-7.
  14. Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ et al. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network (MFMU). (2007) ‘Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labour’. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 109:917-21
  15. Asıcıoglu O, Güngördük K, Yildirim G et al. (2014). ‘Second-stage vs first-stage caesarean delivery: comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes’. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 34:598-604.
  16. McDonnell S, Chandraharan E. (2015) ‘Determinants and Outcomes of Emergency Caesarean Section following Failed Instrumental Delivery: 5-Year Observational Review at a Tertiary Referral Centre in London’. Journal of Pregnancy,627810.
  17. Turner MJ, Maguire PJ. (2015) ‘Vaginal breech delivery at term: the doctors' dilemma’. Irish Medical Journal, 108:69.
  18. Hehir MP. (2015) ‘Trends in vaginal breech delivery’. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 69:1237-9.
  19. The management of breech presentation. guidelines No. 20b;2006. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/gui delines/gtg-no-20b-breech-presentation.pdf
  20. Nahid F. Outcome of singleton term breech cases in the pretext of mode of delivery. Journal-Pakistan Medical Association. 2000 Mar;50(3):81-5.
  21. Ranzcog coll. Management of breech presentation at term. Obst 11: college statement. Ranzcog; 2013

Corresponding Author

Pratibha Jena

Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IMS & SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.