Title: Breakbone Fever- Sonological Manifestations of Dengue

Authors: Dr Harini Bopaiah, Dr Chaitra Srinivas, Dr SC Sanjay, Ajit Kumar Reddy

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i12.29

Abstract

Background: Dengue fever is a major cause of illness and death worldwide. The disease is caused by dengue virus which gets transmitted to humans by the bites of infected mosquitoes, Aedes (Ae.) aegypti and Ae. albopictus [1]. The disease represents a global health issue as it is endemic in around 100 countries, most of which are in tropical and sub-tropical areas.

Objectives: To determine importance of ultrasonography in the early diagnosis, severity grading and prognostic management of patient suffering from dengue To evaluate the typical sonographic features seen in patients suffering from dengue fever. To correlate ultrasound findings with platelet counts and to predict severity of dengue fever based on these findings.

Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study done in KIMS hospital Bangalore from June 2015 to January 2016 involving 140 patients with clinical suspicion of dengue fever. Ultrasound of abdomen, pelvis and thorax was done using GE Voluson Pro750 and Philips HD7 machines.  The typical edematous GB wall thickening resembling onion peel was an important criteria in our Ultrasound study (Sachar and sunders sign). The serology markers were NS1Ag, IgG and IgM. Platelet count values were graded as severe (less than 50,000) and mild (50,000 – 100,000).

Results: Sonography was conducted on 140 patients of whom 110 were seropositive for dengue. With the exclusion of 30 seronegative cases the total number of patients included in our study was 110 cases ranging from 1-90 years of which 64(58%) were males and 46(42%) were female. The majority of patients in the study ranged from 20 to 40 years. All 110 (100%) patients presented with fever, 93 (85%) had generalized body ache, 68(62%) had nausea and vomiting and 25(23%) had generalized skin rash.

Sonographic correlation in 55 patients with platelet count less than 50000, demonstrated gall bladder wall thickening in 52 patients (94%), ascites in 48(87%), pleural effusion in 39 patients (71%), splenomegaly in 14(25%) and hepatomegaly in 11(20%). The 36 patients with platelet count 50000 to 100000/mL, demonstrated gall bladder wall thickening in 29(81%), ascites in 22(61%), pleural effusion in 15(42%), with sonography. In this study, platelet counts were reduced in all 140 cases and dengue serology was positive in 110. Platelet counts below 50000/mL was noted in 55(50%) and 50000 to 100000mL in 36(33%) patients.

Conclusion: In a dengue epidemic ultrasound findings of gall bladder edema with or without ascites, pleural effusion and ascites should definitely suggest a provisional diagnosis of dengue fever prior to confirmatory serology reports. This helps in early management of patients there by reducing morbidity and mortality associated with dengue fever.

Keywords: Dengue fever, gall bladder wall edema, ascites, pleural effusion, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, platelet count.

References

  1. Tang KF, Ooi EE. Diagnosis of dengue: An update. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2012; 10(8):895–907.
  2. World Health Organization andthe Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, Dengueguidelines for diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and control, 2009 edition, World HealthOrganization.
  3. Malavige GN, Fernando S, Fernando DJ, Seneviratne SL. Dengue viral infections. Postgrad Med J. 2004; 80:588–601.
  4. Chan M, Johansson AM. The incubation periods of dengue viruses. PLoS One. 2012; 7(11):e50972.
  5. Guha-Sapir D, Schimmer B. Dengue fever new paradigms for a changing epidemiology. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2005; 2:1–10.
  6. Garg A, Garg J, Rao YK et al.  Prevalence of dengue among clinically suspected febrile episodes at a teaching hospital in North India. Journal of Infectious Diseases andImmunity 2011; 3 (5): 85 – 89.
  7. Reiter P. Yellow fever and dengue: a threat to Europe? Euro Surveill 2010; 15(10): 11 – 16.
  8. Gibbons RV, Vaughn DW.  Dengue: an escalating problem. BMJ2002; 324: 1563 – 1566.
  9. Gurugama P, Garg P, Wijewickrama A, Seneviratne SL.  Dengue viral infections. Indian J Deratol 2010; 55: 68 – 78.
  10. Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention and Control: New Edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009. 4, Laboratory Diagnosis And Diagnostic Tests.
  11. Thrombocytopenia in Dengue: Interrelati-onship between Virus and the Imbalance between Coagulation and Fibrinolysis and Inflammatory Mediators, Elzinandes Leal de Azeredo, Robson Q.Monteiro, and Luzia Maria de-Oliveira Pinto , Mediators of Inflammation Volume 2015(2015), Article ID 313842, 16 pages. Accessed July 15,2016. Dengue - Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control 2009. 
  12. Santhosh VR, Patil PG, Srinath MG, Kumar A, Jain A, Archana M. Sonography in the Diagnosis and Assessment of Dengue Fever.Journal of Clinical Imaging Science. 2014; 4:14. doi:10.4103/2156-7514.129260.
  13. Chandak S, Kumar A. Can Radiology Play a Role in Early Diagnosis of Dengue Fever? North American Journal of Medical Sciences. 2016;8(2):100-105. doi:10.4103/1947-2714.177316.
  14. Venkata Sai PM, Dev B, Krishnan R. Role of ultrasound in dengue fever.Br J Radiol. 2005; 78:416–8.
  15. Shashidhar Gopalakrishna1, Krithika Mohan2. Correlation of Clinical, Serological and Radiological Features of Severe Dengue Fever. Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences (SJAMS). 2015; 3(3E):1397-1399.
  16. Omprakash Bhangdia, Suresh Bhattad, Kirti Bhangdiya. Ultrasound findings in dengue fever. International Journal of Recent Trends in Science And Technology. April 2016; 18(3): 486-488.

Corresponding Author

Dr Chaitra Srinivas

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Radiodiagnosis, KIMS Hospital, Bangalore, India