Title: Assessment of Retention of Skills with Simulator based Training among Anaesthesiology Residents

Authors: Jithumol Thankam Thomas, Bhagyalakshmi R, Rachel Cherian Koshy

 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i10.219

Abstract

Background and Aims: A continuing attempt in graduate education is to devise more effective methods to assess and train the residents. Life sized simulators are nowadays being used as a novel technique for this purpose .The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness  of simulator based training  and retention of learnt  skills  among anesthesiology residents.

Methods: This interventional study was conducted on the 20 postgraduate (pg) residents in our institute, who were divided into 3 groups, based on their years of training - PG Level 1,2 and 3. Each  participant  was given 3 scenarios for simulation on  Advanced Life Support (ALS) SIMULATOR which included A) Endotracheal intubation, B)Advanced  care life support  and C)Epidural technique. At the end of scenario, participants were debriefed and simulator based training provided. The study was then repeated after an interval of 4 weeks. The scores before and after simulator training was compared for each scenario. Also scores between the pg levels were compared. Statistical tests used were Kruskal- Wallis one way Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test.

Results: A significant improvement in scores were noted after 4 weeks of the initial simulator training for all scenarios (p value of 0.000 for all 3 scenarios). While the more experienced final year residents outscored less experienced ones in scenarios A and B, first years scored equally well as their seniors after simulator training for scenario C.

Conclusion: Simulator training can be effectively used to train and refine skills among residents and anaesthesiologists.

Keywords: Simulation, Anaesthesia, Residents, Training, Simulator.

References

  1. Gaba DM: Improving anesthesiologists’ performance by simulating reality. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1992; 76:491–4
  2. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Hart IR, Mayer JW, Felner JM, Petrusa ER, Waugh RA, Brown DD, Safford RR, Gessner IH, Gordon DL, Ewy GA: Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment. JAMA 1999; 282:861–6.
  3. Kapur PA, Steadman RH: Patient simulator competency testing: Ready for takeoff? Anesth Analg 1998; 86:1157–9
  4. Murray DJ: Clinical simulation: Technical novelty or innovation in education. Anesthesiology 1998; 89:1–2.
  5. Gaba DM. The future vision of simulation in healthcare. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:i2-10.
  6. Du Boulay C, Medway C. The clinical skills resource: a review of current practice. Med Educ 1999; 33:185–191.
  7. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 2004; 79(10 Suppl):S70–S81.
  8. Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc 2011; 306: 978–88.
  9. Cook DA, Brydges R, Hamstra SJ, et al. Comparative effectiveness of technology-enhanced simulation versus other instructional methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Simul Health c 2012; 7: 308–20
  10. Lorello G.R,Cook D.A, Johnson R.L et al. Simulation-based training in anaesthesi-ology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Br J Anaesth 2014;112(2),231-45
  11. Hallikainen, Juhana, Väisänenetal. Teaching anaesthesia induction to medical students: comparison between full-scalesimulation and supervised teaching in the operatingtheatre. European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) 2009;26(2):101-104.
  12. Metzner J., Posner K. L., Lam M. S., Domino K. B. Closed claims' analysis Best Practice & Research: Clinical Anaesthesiology 2011;25(2):263–276.
  13. Peterson G. N., Domino K. B., Caplan R. A., Posner K. L., Lee L. A., Cheney F. W. Management of the difficult airway: a closed claims analysis.Anesthesiology 2005;103(1):33–39.
  14. Schaefer J. J., III Simulators and difficult airway management skills.Paediatric Anaesthesia2004;14(1):28–37.
  15. Dalley P, Robinson B, Weller J, Caldwell C. The use of high-fidelity human patientsimulation and the introduction of new anesthesia delivery systems. Anesth Analg 2004; 99:1737–1741.
  16. Paige J., Kozmenko V., Morgan B., et al. From the flight deck to the operating room: an initial pilot study of the feasibility and potential impact of true interdisciplinary team training using high-fidelity simulation.Journal of Surgical Education 2007;64(6):369–377.
  17. Paige J. T., Kozmenko V., Yang T., et al. High-fidelity, simulation-based, interdisci-plinary operating room team training at the point of care.Surgery2009;145(2):138–146.
  18. Chopra V., Gesink B. J., De Jong J., Bovill J. G., Spierdijk J., Brand R. Does training on an anaesthesia simulator lead to improvement in performance?British Journal of Anaesthesia 1994;73(3):293–297.

Corresponding Author

Dr Jithumol Thankam Thomas

C/O M P Philip, Mundukottackal House, Chethackal P.O Ranni, Pathanamthitta District Kerala, Pin code-689677, India

Mobile no- 09632094554, 9008069552

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.