Details
Category: Volume 06 Issue 10 October 2018
Hits: 1234

Title: Defective Dental Restorations: Repair or Replace?

Authors: Pradnya V. Bansode, Seema D. Pathak, M. B. Wavdhane, Hardik Rana, Vaishali U. Bhalerao

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i10.103

Abstract

Dental materials used for direct or indirect restorations of the defects of teeth are placed in the oral environment which constantly undergoes temperature, pH changes, etc. and hosts a variety of microbial flora. Also, these restorative materials have to withstand the constant cyclic occlusal loading when teeth are in function or parafunction. All these may lead to defects in the restoration or their complete failure over time. This article reviews the methods of identifying the defects that are seen in these restorations and criteria applied whether they will require monitoring, refurbishment, repair or replacement.

Keywords: refurbishment of restoration, repair of restoration, replacement of restoration, amalgam, composite, ceramic, all ceramic, glass ionomer cement.

References

  1. V. Gordan, C. Shen, and I. A. Mjor, “Marginal gap repair with flowable resin-based composites, ”General Dentistry, vol. 52, no.5, pp. 390–394, 2004.
  2. V. Gordan, “Clinical evaluation of replacement of class Vresin based composite restorations,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 29,no. 7, pp. 485–488, 2001.
  3. Javier Martin, Eduardo Fernandez, Juan Estay, Valeria V. Gordan, Ivar Andreas Mjör, and Gustavo Moncada Management of Class I and Class II Amalgam Restorations with Localized Defects: Five-Year Results, International Journal of Dentistry, Volume 2013, Article ID 450260.
  4. Setcos JC, Khosravi R, Wilson NH, Shen C, Yang M, Mjor IA. Repair or replacement of amalgam restorations: decisions at a USA and a UK dental school. Operative Dentistry 2004;29:392–7.
  5. Sharif MO, Catleugh M, Merry A, Tickle M, Dunne SM, Brunton P, et al. Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: resin composite. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010:CD005971.
  6. Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjor IA, Peters M,et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Clinical Oral Investigations 2007;11:5–33.
  7. Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjor I, Bayne S, Peters M, et al.FDI World Dental Federation – clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations. Update and clinical examples. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry2010;12:259–72.
  8. Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjor I, Bayne S, Peters M, et al. FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the clinical examples. Clinical Oral Investigations 2010;14:349–66.
  9. Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjor IA, Peters M,et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials, Science Committee Project 2/98 – FDI World Dental Federation study design (Part I) and criteria for evaluation (Part II) of direct and indirect restorations including onlays and partial crowns. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 2007;9(Suppl. 1):121–47.
  10. F. Cvar and G. Ryge, “Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. 1971 US PublicHealth Service: San Francisco,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 215–232, 2005.
  11. Repair of restorations – Criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations, Reinhard Hickel, Katrin Brüshaver, Nicoleta Ilie, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany, Dental Materials 2 9 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 28–50
  12. Baur V, Ilie N. Repair of dental resin-based composites. Clinical Oral Investigations 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0722-4.
  1. Yap AU, Quek CE, Kau CH. Repair of new-generation tooth-colored restoratives: methods of surface conditioning to achieve bonding. Operative Dentistry1998;23:173–8.
  2. Parra M, Kopel HM. Shear bond strength of repaired glass ionomers. American Journal of Dentistry 1992;5:133–6.
  3. Pearson GJ, Bowen G, Jacobsen P, Atkinson AS. The flexural strength of repaired glass-ionomer cements. Dental Materials 1989;5:10–2.
  4. Maneenut C, Sakoolnamarka R, Tyas MJ. The repair potential of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. Dental Materials 2010;26:659–65.
  5. Yap AU, Lye KW, Sau CW. Effects of aging on repair of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2000;27:422–7.
  6. Shaffer RA, Charlton DG, Hermesch CB. Repairability ofthree resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials.Operative Dentistry 1998;23:168–72.
  7. Heintze SD, Rousson V. Survival of zirconia- and metal-supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. International Journal of Prosthodontics 2010;23:493–502.
  8. Blum IR, Jagger DC, Wilson NH. Defective dental restorations: to repair or not to repair? Part 2: All-ceramics and porcelain fused to metal systems. Dental Update 2011;38:150–2, 154–6, 158.
  9. Anusavice KJ. Standardizing failure, success, and survival decisions in clinical studies of ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses. Dental Materials 2012;28:102–11.
  10. Ozcan M, Valandro LF, Amaral R, Leite F, Bottino MA. Bond strength durability of a resin composite on a reinforced ceramic using various repair systems. Dental Materials2009;25:1477–83.

Corresponding Author

Vaishali U. Bhalerao

Dept. of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics,

Government Dental College & Hospital, Aurangabad - 431001, Maharashtra, India