Title: Statistical Analysis of Ridge Densities in Fingerprint as a Parameter for Identification of Sex

Authors: Pinki Kumari, Aman Kumar, Sanjeev Kumar, Saroj Kumar Ranjan, Nikhil Goel, Sanjay Kumar

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i10.50

Abstract

Introduction: Study of fingerprint is known as Dactylography. It is the process of taking impression of papillary ridges of the fingertips.

Objective: The present study is based on Dactylography in which ridge densities in fingerprints is studied as a parameter for identification of sex.

Material and Method: The study was conducted on 500 healthy people (250 male and 250 female) between ages of 18 and 60 years. Fingerprints were taken using Glass slab inking roller method. The type of fingerprint pattern and ridge density in these patterns was analyzed for sex identification.

Results: The loop pattern of fingerprint was found in in majority (61.20%) of cases. This study also revealed that fingerprint ridge density in female is 13.42 in comparison to male 11.97.

Conclusion: The highest frequency of fingerprint pattern among male and female is Loop (61.20%), and Ridge density in female is more than male.

Keywords: Fingerprint, ridge density, identification.

References

  1. Vij K. Textbook of Forensic medicine, principles and practice 1st Ed. New Delhi: Churchill Livingstone Pvt; 2001:62.
  2. Nandy A principles of Forensic medicine 1stEd. Kolkata: New Central Agency 1995; 92.
  3. Kahn HS, Graff M, Stein AD, Zybert PA, McKeague IW,Lumey LH. A fingerprint characteristic associated with the early parental environment. AM J Hum Biol. 2008; 20(1): 59 – 65.
  4. Payne – James, Jones, Karch, Marlove. Simpson’s forensic medicine. 13th Ed, New York; CRC Press, 2014:36.
  5. Modi JP, Modi’s Medical Jurisprudence and Toxicology, 22’W Ed. Noida: Lexis Nexis Butlerworths;2002:37, 39, 40 & 72.
  6. M. R, RajashekaraReddy.K (1983) – Fingerprint Dermatoglyphics of Adikarnatakas: A Scheduled caste population of Mysore city, Karnataka, man in India 83(1 & 2): 183 – 193.
  7. Prukit R fingerprint classification; A comparative study among Mundas & Lodhas. JMFT 2003 vol. 14, no.1; 31-32.
  8. Nithin V study of fingerprint classification and their gender distribution among South Indian population Journal of Forensic and legal medicine. 2009; 16 (8): 460 – 463.
  9. Nayak VC et al. sex differences from fingerprint ridge density in Chinese and Malaysian population. Forensic. Sci. Int. 2010; 197 (1): 67 – 69.
  10. Gungadin S. sex determination from fingerprint ridge density. Internet Journal of Medical update. 2007; 2(2): 4 – 7.
  11. Sandeep V Binorkar. Study on fingerprint pattern and gender distribution in and around Nanded district of Maharshtra state. Eur J Forensic Sci, Jan-Mar 2017, Vol 4, Issue 1
  12. Sayed Yunus Khadri et al. A study of fingerprint pattern and gender distribution of finger print in and around Bijapur. Al Ameen J Med. Sci. 2013; 6 (4): 328 – 331.

Corresponding Author

Aman Kumar

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.