Details
Category: Volume 06 Issue 10 October 2018
Hits: 1396

Title: Comparative evaluation of the Modified Mallampati Score (MMC) and Modified Mallampati Score along with Thyromental distance, Anatomical abnormality, and Cervical mobility (M-TAC) in predicting difficult airway

Authors: Dr Aradhana Arya, Dr Lalit Mohan, Dr Urmila Palaria, Dr A. K. Sinha, Dr Bikramjit Das, Dr Rajan Yaday, Soorej Balan

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i10.24

Abstract

Background: The MMC has been found to be of limited value and cannot be relied on for using in predicting difficult airway. Thus, we used a combination of multiple tests (combining MMC with Thyromental distance, Anatomical abnormality and Cervical mobility [M-TAC]to provide a high index of sensitivity and specificity for prediction of difficult airway.

Methodology: Two hundred patients, scheduled for general anaesthesia (GA) requiring endotracheal intubation for elective surgical procedures were evaluated in this prospective, double blind, case control study. Airway assessment was done first by MMC and then by combination of tests (M-TAC). Anaesthesiologists assessing and managing airway were different and blinded for airway parameter. Difficult intubation was assessed by modified Cormack and Lehane grading (CL) and correlated with pre-operative airway assessment. Patients, failed to be intubated, were intubated by different methods and excluded from the study.

Results: Our results showed that M-TAC in comparison to MMC had  higher sensitivity (96.29% vs 74.07%), specificity (81.50% vs 73.41%), positive predictive value (PPV) (44.83% vs 30.30%). and negative predictive value (NPV) (99.30%vs 94.78%). The odd’s ratio (114.60, (95% CI14.99 to 875.64 vs 7.89, 95% CI) was3.130 to 19.882, positive likelihood ratio (LR) was (1.20 vs 1.02), negative LR(1.17 vs 0.99) in predicting difficult airway.

Conclusion: M-TAC, as pre operative assessment test gives better prediction of difficult airway and therefore decreases the adverse outcome incidence related to unanticipated difficult airway though requires precision and time.

Keywords:  endotracheal intubation, laryngoscopy, airway management, general anaesthesia.

References

  1. Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, Waraksa B, Freiburger D, Liu PL. A Clinical sign to predict difficult intubation; A prospective study.Can Anaesth Soc J 1985; 32: 429-434.
  2. Wilson ME, Spiegelhalter D, Robertson JA, Lesser P. Predicting difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth.1988 Aug;61 (2):211-6.
  3. Al Ramadhani S, Mohamed LA, Rocke DA, Gouws E. Sternomental distance as the sole predictor of difficult laryngoscopy in obstetric anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1996;77:312 6.
  4. Yamamoto K, Tsubokawa T, Shibata K, Ohmura S, Nitta S, Kobayashi T. Predicting difficult laryngoscopy with indirect laryngoscopy. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:316 21.
  5. Krobbuaban B, Diregpoke S, Kumkeaw S, Tanomsat M. The predictive value of the height ratio and thyromental distance: four predictive tests for difficult laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2005 Nov;101(5):1542-5.
  6. Patil VU, Stehling LC, Zauder HL. Predicting the difficulty of intubation utilizing an intubation guide. Anaesthesiology, 1983; 10: 32.
  7. Schmitt HJ, Kirmse M, Radespiel-Troger M. Ratio of patient's height to thyromental distance improves prediction of difficult laryngoscopy. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2002 Dec;30(6):763-5
  8. Butler PJ, Dhara SS. Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy: an assessment of thyromental distance and Mallampati predictive tests. Anaesth Intensive Care 1992;20:139e42
  9. Jimson CT, Eric BR, hussain A. Predicting difficult airway in surgical patients scheduled for general anaesthesia: A prospective blind study. Anesth Analg 1995;81:254-258
  10. El-Ganzouri AR, McCarthy RJ, Tuman KJ, Tanck EN, Ivankovich AD. Preoperative airway assessment: predictive value of a multivariate risk index. Anesth Analg. 1996 Jun;82(6):1197-204
  11. Bilgin H, Ozyurt G. Screening tests for predicting difficult intubation. A clinical assessment in Turkish patients. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1998;26(4):382-6.
  12. Greenland KB. Airway assessment based on a three column model of direct laryngoscopy. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010 Jan;38(1):14-9
  13. Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2011 May;106(5):617-31
  14. Khan ZH, Gharabaghian M, Nilli F, Ghiamat M, Mohammadi M. Easy endotracheal intubation of a patient suffering from both Cushing's and Nelson's syndromes predicted by the upper lip bite test despite a Mallampati Class 4 airway. Anesth Analg. 2007 Sep;105 (3):786-7.
  15. Mahmoodpoor Ata, Soleimanpour Hassan,Jafar panahi Rahimi, et al. Sensitivity of Palm Print, Modified Mallampati Score and 3-3-2 Rule in Prediction of Difficult Intubation. Int J Prev Med. 2013 September; 4(9): 1063–69.
  16. Bilgin H, Ozyurt G. Screening tests for predicting difficult intubation. A clinical assessment in Turkish patients. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1998;26(4):382-6.
  17. Bhat RR, Kumar Miashra, Badhe AS. Comparison of upper lip bite test and modified mallampati classification in predicting difficult intubation. Internet J Anesthesiol 2007;13(1)
  18. Ambesh S , SinghN, Rao P , Gupta D 1et al. A combination of the modified Mallampati score, thyromental distance, anatomical abnormality, and cervical mobility (M-TAC) predicts difficult laryngoscopy better than Mallampati classification. Acta Anaesthesiologica Taiwanica 2013;51: 58-62.
  19. Adamus M, Jor O, Vavreckova T, Hrabalek L, Zapletalova J, Gabrhelik T, et al. Inter-observer reproducibility of 15 tests used for predicting difficult intubation. Biomedical Papers of the Medical Faculty of Palacky University in Olomouc, Czech Republic. 2011;155 (3):275-81.
  20. Naguib M, Scamman FL, O'Sullivan C, Aker J, Ross AF, Kosmach S, et al. Predictive performance of three multivariate difficult tracheal intubation models: a double-blind, case-controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2006 Mar;102 (3):818-24
  21. Wilson ME, Spiegelhalter D, Robertson JA, Lesser P. Predicting difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth.1988 Aug;61 (2):211-6.
  22. Adamus M, Jor O, Vavreckova T, Hrabalek L, Zapletalova J, Gabrhelik T, et al. Inter-observer reproducibility of 15 tests used for predicting difficult intubation. Biomedical Papers of the Medical Faculty of Palacky University in Olomouc, Czech Republic. 2011;155 (3):275-81.
  23. Cormack RS, Lehane J: Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia 1984; 39:1105-1111.

Corresponding Author

Dr Lalit Mohan

Senior Resident, Department of Radiotherapy, Govt Medical College, Haldwani, Uttarakhand, India

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.