Details
Category: Volume 06 Issue 09 September 2018
Hits: 1515

Title: Sensitivity and Specificity of Palm Print Sign in Difficult Laryngoscopy among Diabetic Patients

Authors: Dr Priya K, Dr Sandhya M S, Dr Sheela P

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i9.127

Abstract

Background: Early securing of the airway at the induction of anaesthesia is imperative in patients at risk, making preoperative identification of the diabetics with difficult airway decisive. Diabetic patients are susceptible for limited joint mobility syndrome. Involvement of atlantooccipital joint limits adequate extension of head and neck during laryngoscopy leading to difficult intubation. The collagen glycosylation is first noted in the fourth and fifth inter-phalangeal joints leading to inability to approximate the palms and fingers of the hand. The palmprint has been used to objectively assess the degree of inter phalangeal joint involvement. A palm print score from 0-3 based on the degree of visibility of phalangeal areas on a piece of paper is assessed as a predictor of difficult laryngoscopy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of palm print sign as a screening tool for predicting difficult laryngoscopy in diabetic patients. '

Methods: Preoperatively, airway of 267 patients were assessed by the investigator, while they were sitting upright in a chair using the modified Mallampati test, thyromental distance, degree of head extension and the palm print test. Palm print is obtained by taking the ink impression of the dominant hand palm. Their corresponding Cormack- Lehane score [Gold standard] were noted at the time of intubation by the attending anaesthesiologist. He was blinded to the results of preoperative airway evaluation. Cormack lehane 3 or 4 view, Palm print grade 2, Mallampati grade 3 and 4, Thyromental distance grade 0,Head extension grade 1 were defined as predictors of difficult intubation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of each were compared to get the results.

Conclusion: The PP test seems to be the most sensitive and specific tool in the prediction of difficult laryngoscopy among diabetic patients.

Keywords: Palm print sign, Diabetic, Difficult laryngoscopy.

References

  1. Myatra SN, Shah A, Kundra P, Patwa A, Ramkumar V, Divatia JV, et al. All India Difficult Airway Association 2016 guidelines for the management of unanticipated difficult tracheal intubation in adults. Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60:885–98. 
  2. Erden V, Basaranoglu G, Delatioglu H, Hamzaoglu NS. Relationship of difficult laryngoscopy to long‐term non‐insulin‐dependent diabetes and hand abnormality detected using the ‘prayer sign’. British journal of anaesthesia. 2003 Jul 1;91(1):159-60.
  1. Sachdeva KP, Singh A, Kathuria S, Kaul TJ, Rupinder M, Bajwa N, et al. Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy in diabetics by palm print and interphalangeal gap. J Anaesth Clin Pharmacol 2005;21:261-4.
  2. Hashim KV, Thomas M. Sensitivity of palm print sign in prediction of difficult laryngoscopy in diabetes: A comparison with other airway indices. Indian journal of anaesthesia. 2014 May;58(3):298.
  3. Gondane SR, Kudalkar A, Padmanabha DV, Raut SD. Evaluation of airway and predicting difficult endotracheal intubation in diabetic patients-A comparison with nondiabetic patients. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare. 2017 Jan 1;4(9):523-7.
  4. SM. Predicting difficult intubation – Worth while exercise or pointless ritual? Anaesthesia 2002;57:105-9.
  5. Vani VV, Kamath SK, Naik LD. The palm print as a sensitive predictor of difficult laryngoscopy in diabetics: a comparison with other airway evaluation indices. Journal of postgraduate medicine. 2000 Apr 1;46(2):75.
  6. Lee A, Fan LT, Gin T, Karmakar MK, Ngan Kee WD. A systematic review (meta-analysis) of the accuracy of the Mallampati tests to predict the difficult airway. Anesth Analg 2006;102:1867-78.
  7. Gupta S, Sharma R, Jain D. Airway assessment: Predictors of difficult airway. Indian J Anaesth 2005;49:257-62.
  8. George SP, Jacob R. Predictability of airway evaluation indices in diabetic patients. Indian J Anaesth 2003;47:476-8.
  9. Benumof JL. Management of the difficult adult airway: with special emphasis on awake tracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 1991; 75:1087-1110.
  10. Reissell E, Orko R, Maunuksela EL, Lindgren L. Predictability of difficult laryngoscopy in patients with long-term diabetes mellitus. Anaesthesia 1990; 45:1024-1027. 
  11. Nadal JL, Fernandez BG, Escobar IC, Black M, Rosenblatt WH. The palm print as a sensitive predictor of difficult laryngoscopy in diabetics. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998; 42:199-203.
  12. Ezri T, Gewü rtz G, Sessler DI, Medalion B, Szmuk P, Hagberg C, et al. Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy in obese patients by ultrasound quantification of anterior neck soft tissue. Anaesthesia 2003;58: 1111-4.
  13. Tü rkan S, Ateş Y, Cuhruk H, Tekdemir I. Should we reevaluate the variables for predicting the difficult airway in anesthesiology? Anesth Analg 2002;94:1340-4.

Corresponding Author

Dr Sandhya M S

Asst. Professor, Dept. of Anaesthesiology, Government Medical College, Thirvananthapuram, Kerala, India