Title: Efficacy and Outcome of Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair- A Prospective Study

Authors: Dr Shashikant Verma, Dr Ashutosh Silodia, Dr Mayuresh Hinduja, Dr Mahendra Singh Gond

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i9.83

Abstract

Introduction: The popularity of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is increasing due to less tissue dissection leading to less postoperative pain and a shorter duration of convalescence compared with an open hernia repair technique. There are two laparoscopic surgeries available for a groin hernia, Trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) and totally extra-peritoneal (TEP) hernia repair.

Aim of this study was to find out the efficacy and outcome of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Method: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair was done in 20 patients using either TAPP or TEP technique.

Observation: 10 cases (50 %) underwent TAPP repair and 10 cases (50%) TEP, of which 3 cases of TAPP and 2 cases of TEP was converted to open repair (25% cases) due to intraoperative complication. Mean operative time was 138 minutes for TAAP and180 minutes for TEP. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 3.71 days for TAAP and 3 days for TEP. Number of doses of analgesia required postoperatively for first 3 days was 7.71 doses in TAPP group and 7 doses in TEP group. There was no recurrence in follow up period.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic hernia repair is a good technique but has a longer learning curve but good postoperative recovery manifested as less pain, earlier mobilization and early return to his daily routine activity. The technique was efficacious as there was no recurrence in our study. There was significant decrease in pain score in both TAPP and TEP group, VAS scoring was >80% from 1st to 3rd post operated day.

Keywords: TAPP- Trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal repair, TEP- totally extra-peritoneal hernia repair, VAS scoring- Visual Analogue Scoring.

References

  1. McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM; EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.2003;(1):CD001785.
  2. Stengel D, Stengel D, Lange V. [Quality of life after inguinal hernia operation results of a prospective study (Shouldice, Lichtenstein, TAPP)]. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd 1998;115:1020-1023
  3. Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Bartsch DK, Fendrich V, Koch OO, Pointner R, Granderath FA Trans abdominal preperitoneal versus totally extra peritoneal repair of inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis of randomized studies. Am J Surg. 2013 Aug; 206(2):245-252.e1.
  4. Thammasitboon S, Thammasitboon S A critical appraisal of a systematic review: Sokol J, Jacob SE, Bohn D: Inhaled nitric oxide for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in children and adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003 (1): CD002787. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005 May; 6(3):340-3.
  5. Pahwa HS, Kumar A, Agarwal P, Agarwal AA Current trends in laparoscopic groin hernia repair: A review. World J Clin Cases.2015 Sep 16;3(9):789-92 .
  6. Fitzgibbons RJ, Richards AT, Quinn TH. Open hernia repair. In: Souba WS, Mitchell P, Fink MP, Jurkovich GJ, Kaiser LR, et al., editors. ACS Surgery: Princi-ples and Practice. 6th ed. Philadelphia, USA: Decker Publishing Inc; 2002. pp. 828–849.
  7. Risk factors for inguinal hernia among adults in the US population. Ruhl CE, Everhart JE Am J Epidemiol. 2007 May 15; 165(10):1154-61.
  8. Schier F. Laparoscopic inguinal  hernia  repair­ a prospective study. J Pediatr    2006  Jun;41(6):1081­-4.
  9. Sajid MS, Caswell J, Singh KK Laparoscopic Versus Open Preperitoneal Mesh Repair of Inguinal Hernia: an Integrated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Published Randomized Controlled Trials. Indian J Surg.2015 Dec;77(Suppl 3):1258-69
  10. Panton ONM, Panton RJ. Laparoscopic hernia repair. Am J Surg. 1994;167:535–537.
  11. Phillips EH, Arregui ME, Carroll BJ, et al. Incidence of complications following laparoscopic hernioplasty. Surg Endosc. 1995;9:16–21.
  12. Millikan KW, Kosik ML, Doolas A. A prospective comparison of trans abdominal preperitoneal hernia repair versus traditional open hernia repair in a university setting. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994;4:247–253.
  13. Cornell RB, Kerlakian GM. Early complications and outcomes of the current technique of transperitoneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy and a comparison to the traditional approach. Am J Surg. 1994;168:275–279
  14. Wang MG, Shen YM, Chen J, Cao JX, Zhu YL, Yang S Discussion of laparoscopic trans abdominal preperitoneal repair for recurrent inguinal hernia Zhonghua Yi Xue ZaZhi 2016 May 31;96(20):1588-90
  15. Hanif H, Memon SA Outcome of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty for inguinal hernia. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad.2015 Jul-Sep;27(3):613-6
  16. Jakhmola CK, Kumar A Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in the Armed Forces: A 5-year single centrestudy. Med J Armed Forces India.2015 Oct;71(4):317-23
  17. Kapiris SA1, Brough WA, Royston CM, O'Boyle C, Sedman PC, Laparoscopic trans abdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair. A 7-year two-center experience in 3017 patients. Surg Endosc.2001 Sep;15 (9):972-5.

Corresponding Author

Dr Ashutosh Silodia

Associate Professor, Department of General Surgery, NSCBMCH Jabalpur, India