Details
Category: Volume 06 Issue 07 July 2018
Hits: 1101

Title: Gender Differences in Terms of Recalling Treatment Instructions – An in Vivo Study

Authors: Rashmi Mittal, Aditya Kapoor, Khurshid A. Mattoo

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i7.140

Abstract

Medical and dental treatments require effective communication, both quantitatively and qualitatively to accomplish success. Instructions given to the patient are essential components of ensuring patient compliance. For some, treatment procedures, instructions are numerous and difficult. Nature has distributed abilities between sexes among humans. This study aims to find the gender differences about their ability to retain the instructions given to them during prosthodontic treatment while also determining the efficacy of such instructions.

Materials and Methods: Ninety completely edentulous patients were rehabilitated with complete denture prosthesis. A list of instructions pertaining to education and motivation of such patients were tabulated and divided into five categories (general, treatment needs, specific, significant and miscellaneous). At two different follow-up visits, the patients were asked to recall the instructions in various categories. The efficacy of the followed instructions was determined by recording of denture plaque index. Paired ‘t’ test was applied for comparison between the 1st and the 2nd appointment recall of instructions. Significant difference was determined at P< 0.05 level between various categories.

Results: Between various categories, general instructions were recalled more than other categories but at the second recall. Between genders, female patients recalled more instructions than males at the second appointment.

Conclusion: This study concludes that the ability of male and female gender differs and the factors associated with it should be taken into consideration before depending on patients to follow treatment instructions on their own.

Keywords: patient compliance, complete denture, treatment needs, patient instructions.

References

  1. Zlataric DK, Celebic A. Treatment outcomes with removable partial dentures: a comparison between patient and prosthodontist assessments. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14:423-6.
  2. Jacob RF, Zarb GA, Bolender CL. Waxing and processing the dentures, their insertion and follow up. In: Zarb-Bolender. 12th ed. Prosthodontic treatment of edentulous patients; 2003: 414-9.
  3. Sondell K, Palmqvist S, Soderfeldt B. The dentist’s communicative role in prosthodontic treatment.Int J  Prosthodont 2004;17:666-71
  4. Guckes AD, Smith DE, Swoope CC. Counselling and related factors influencing satisfaction with dentures. J Prosthet Dent.1978; 39 (3): 259-67.
  5. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310 (20): 2191-4
  6. Schalbel RW. Patient education with prosthetic acrylic resin models. J Prosthet Dent 1967; 17 (2): 106-8.
  7. Maison WG. Instructions to the denture patient. J Prosthet Dent.1959; 9 (5): 825-31.
  8. Swenson MG. Neglected factors in denture service. J Prosthet Dent. 1951; 1:71-7.
  9. Boos RH. Preparation and conditioning of patients for prosthetic treatment. J Prosthet Dent. 1959; 9(1):4-10.
  10. Vere AM. Denture education for edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent. 1966; 16(6):1013-8.
  11. Jeganathan S. Common faults in complete dentures: a review. Quintessence Int 1993; 24:483-7.
  12. Ortman LF. Patient education and complete denture maintenance. In: Sheldon Winkler. 2nd ed. Essentials of complete denture Prosthodontics; 1996: 331-40.
  13. Educating the patient. In: Rahn AR, Heartwell CM. 5th ed. Textbook of complete dentures; 2002:121-30.
  14. The post insertion phase of denture treatment. D Clin North America 1960: 343-58.
  15. Budtz-Jorgensen. Materials and methods for cleaning dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1979; 42 (6): 619:23.
  16. McCabe JF. A method for scoring plaque. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent.1996; 4(2):59-64.
  17. Jeganathan S, Chan YC. A clinically viable index for quantifying denture plaque. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 569-73.
  18. Anastassiadou V, Katsouli S, Heath MR, Pissiotis A and Kapari D. Validation of communication between elderly denture wearers and dentists: a questionnaire on satisfaction with complete dentures using semi-structured interviews. Gerodontology 2004; 21; 195–200
  19. Roessler DM. Complete denture success for patients and dentists. International Dental Journal 2003; 53: 340–5.
  20. Sondell K. Dentist patient communication and patient satisfaction in prosthetic dentistry. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 28–37.
  21. Kessels PC. Patients’ memory for medical information. J R Soc Med 2003; 96: 219–222.
  22. Zirwas MJ. Patient education strategies in Dermatology- part 1: benefits and challenges. J Clin Aesthetic Dermatol 2009; 2 (12): 24-7.
  23. Witt E. and Bartsch A. (1993). The effect of information and communication in the orthodontic consultation. Part 1: the imparting of information. Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 54, 187–195
  24. Thompson AM. A comparison of information retention at an initial orthodontic consultation. European Journal of Orthodontics.2001; 23:169-78.

Corresponding Author

Dr Khurshid A Mattoo

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.