Details
Category: Volume 06 Issue 06 June 2018
Hits: 1222

Title: A Study on different histological variants of Phyllodes tumour of Breast and Fibroadenoma with special emphasis to differentiate Fibroadenoma from Benign Phyllodes tumour – A Retrospective 2 years study in a Tertiary care centre

Authors: Dr Gopinath Barui, Dr Tripti Das, Dr Santanu Nandy

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i6.122

Abstract

Background: Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast tumour in adolescent and young women of child bearing age group arising from the Terminal Duct Lobular Unit (TDLU) and featuring a proliferation of both epithelial and stromal elements. Phyllodes tumours are rare fibro epithelial tumours of the breast tumours account for0.3–1% of all primary tumours of the breast predominantly in middle-aged women. Intracanalicular fibroadenoma with increased stromal cellularity closely mimics benign phyllodes tumour but it has to be differentiated properly as clinical management and prognosis are different in both the cases.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational study was done in Department of Pathology, R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata; over a period of 2 years from January 2016 to December 2017. Total 127 cases of fibroadenoma and 19 cases of phyllodes tumour cases were analyzed.

Results: Out of total 146 cases, 127 cases (87%) were Fibroadenoma and rest 19 cases (13%) were Phyllodes tumours. Out of 19 cases of phyllodes tumours 11 (57.8%) were Benign Phyllodes, 7 (36.8%) were Borderline Phyllodes and 1(5.4%) was Malignant phyllodes. Fibroadenomas were most common in the 11-20 yrs (45.67%) age group, followed by 21-30 yrs (36.22%), while phyllodes were more common in 41-50 yrs (36.84%) age group. Fibrocystic changes were present in 13.39% cases of fibroadenoma. Fibroadenoma and Benign Phyllodes tumour of breast were differentiated on the basis of 3 histological feature i.e. stromal cellularity, cellular pleomorphism and mitotic activity.

Conclusion: There is various histomorphological variants of fibroadenoma and 3 types of phyllodes tumour; which were studied and this knowledge is very helpful where there is overlapping features of both the tumours and chance of confusion is present. Special emphasis was given to differentiate fibroadenoma from benign phyllodes.

Keywords: Phyllodes tumour, fibroadenoma, breast.

References

  1. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Breast,2012, 4th edition,chapter11, page no.142-147
  2. Sternberg’s Diagnostic Surgical Pathology, 6th edition ,volume 1, chapter 9,page no.366-370
  3. Rosen’s Breast Pathology, 4th edition, chapter 8, Fibroepithelialneoplasms, page no.213-270
  4. JayasingheY, Patricia SS. Fibroadenomas in adolescence. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynaecology.2009;21:5:402-406
  5. Levy MS, Sella T, Alweiss T, Cracian I, Libson E, Mally B. Incidence and Management of Complex Fibroadenomas. American J of Roentgenology 2008;190: 1:214-218
  6. Kuijper A, Mommers EC, van der Wall E, van Diest PJ. Histopathology of Fibroadenoma of the breast. Am J ClinPathol.2011;115:736-742.
  7. Kuijper A, Buerger H, Simon R, et al. Analysis of the progression of fibroepithelial tumours of the breast by PCR based clonalityassay.J Pathol. 2002;197:575-81
  8. Noguchi S,Yokouchi H, Aihara T, Motomura K, Inaji H, Imaoka S, et al. Progression of fibroadenoma to phyllodes tumour demonstrated by clonal analysis. Cancer.1995;76:1779-85
  9. Rosai J; Ackerman’s Surgical Pathology, 9th edition,Mosby;2004:1769-831
  10. AL-Nafussi AI, Jordan Lee B, Thomas st JJ, editors, Breast Tumours. In: Tumour Diagnosis Practical Analysis. 2nd Holder Headline group. London, 2005:165-73
  11. Fletcher JA, Pinkus GS, Weinder N, etal. Lineage –restricted clonality in biphasic solid tumours.Am J Pathol 1991;138:1199-207
  12. Lee AH, Hodi Z, EllisI O, Elston CW Histological features useful in the distinction of phyllodes tumour and fibroadenoma on core needle biopsy of the breast. Histopathology. Sep 2007;51(3): 336-44
  13. Chia Y, Thike AA, Cheok PY, et al Stromal keratin expression in phyllodes tumours of the breast: a comparison with other spindle cell breast lesions. I ClinPathol2012;65:339-347.

Corresponding Author

Dr Tripti Das

Post Graduate Trainee, Department of Pathology

Address: AB Ladies Hostel, R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital

1, Khudiram Bose Sarani, Kolkata-700004 ,West Bengal, India

Mobile no. 9635781818, Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.