Title: Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) for Management of Inferior Calyceal 1-2 cm Stones: A Matched Pair Analysis

Authors: Dr Gyan Prakash Singh, Dr Pradeepta Kumar Panda

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i6.102

Abstract

Objective: To compare percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the treatment of lower calyceal calculi with diameter of 1- 2.

Method: 59 patients who had renal stones ranging from 2 to 4 cm in diameter were treated with RIRS. The outcomes of these patients were compared with patients who underwent PCNL using matched-pair analysis (1:1 scenario). The matching parameters were the size, number and location of the stones as well as age, gender, body mass index, solitary kidney, degree of hydronephrosis, presence of previous shock wave lithotripsy and open surgery.

Results: The two study groups were comparable for demographic characteristics and stone characteristics. It was found that RIRS is comparable to PCNL as a treatment modality in inferior calyceal renal stones of size 1 – 2 cm. The efficacy as defined by stone clearance rate was similar in the two procedures. RIRS had a shorter hospital stay, lesser morbidity and complications compared to PCNL.

Conclusion: RIRS is an effective and safe alternative to PCNL in the treatment of inferior calyceal stones of size 1 – 2 cm. The choice of surgical technique between PCNL and RIRS should depend upon the expertise and choice of the surgeon as well as take the financial capability of the patient into account.

References

  1. Nikolaos Ferakisand Marios Stavropoulos et al. Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of renal and upper ureteral stones: Lessons learned from a review of the literature. Urol Ann. 2015 Apr-Jun; 7(2): 141–148.
  2. Helal M, Black T, Lockhart J, Figueroa TE. The Hickman peel-away sheath: Alternative for paediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 1997; 11:171–2. 
  3. Jackman S., Docimo S., Cadeddu J., Bishoff J., Kavoussi L., Jarrett T. (1998a) The ‘mini-perc’ technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 16: 371–374.
  4. Sabnis R., Ganesamoni R., Ganpule A., Mishra S., Vyas J., Jagtap J., et al. (2013) Current role of microperc in the management of small renal calculi. Indian J Urol 29: 214–218.
  5. Shashikant Mishra, et al .Tubeless mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants and preschool children: a preliminary report. J Urol. 2010.;24:1935–9
  6. Janak Desai,Solanki, R. et al“A Novel Technique of Ultra-Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Introduction and an Initial Experience for Treatment of Upper Urinary Calculi Less Than 2 cm,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 490793.
  7. Park J,Bumsik Hong, Taehan Park, HyungKeun Park et al , Effectiveness of noncontrast computed tomography in evaluation of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J 2007 Jul; 21(7):684-7.
  8. Darsan Sharma et al .The “All-Seeing Needle”: Initial Results of an Optical Puncture System Confirming Access in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. European journal Urology. Jun 2011, Vol. 59, No. 6: 1054-1059.
  9. Turk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, et al. Guidelines on Urolithiasis. European Association of Urology,2012.
  10. Wing-hang AU. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS)- Ureterorenoscopic Lithotripsy for Renal Stones VOL.14 NO.10 OCTOBER 2009 medical bulletin .
  11. Mahajan P M, PadhyeA S, et al Is stenting required before retrograde intrarenal surgery with access sheath. Indian J Urol2009;25:326-8
  12. Kursad Zengin, Serhat Tanik, Nihat Karakoyunlu, Nevzat Can Sener, Sebahattin Albayrak, Can Tuygun, Hasan Bakirtas, M. Abdurrahim Imamoglu and Mesut Gurdal. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery versus Percutaneous Lithotripsy to Treat Renal Stones 2-3 cm in Diameter. Hindawi Publishing Corporation BioMed Research International Volume 2015, Article ID 914231 .
  13. Akman, M. Binbay, F. Ozgor et al., “Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of 2-4 cm stones: a matched-pair analysis,”  BJU International, vol. 109, no. 9, pp. 1384–1389, 2012.
  14. Sabnis R., Ganesamoni R., Ganpule A., Mishra S., Vyas J., Jagtap J., et al. (2013) Current role of microperc in the management of small renal calculi. Indian J Urol 29: 214–218.
  15. Fayad, Mohamed G.Elsheikh, Waleed Ghoneima Tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower calyceal stones of ⩽2 cm: A prospective randomised controlled study .Arab J Urol. 2017 Mar; 15(1): 36–41.
  16. Hongyang Jiang, Zhe Yu, Liping Chen, Tao Wang, Zhuo Liu, Jihong Liu, Shaogang Wang, and Zhangqun Ye . Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Bio Med Research International, Volume 2017, Article ID 2035851.

Corresponding Author

Dr Pradeepta Kumar Panda

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Mobile no-9437031992