Title: Clinical profiles of patients undergoing pacemaker implantation in India

Authors: Dr Mayank Jain, Dr Priyanka Kiyawat, Dr Surbhi Kiyawat

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i6.08

Abstract

Background and Objective: The implantation of a permanent cardiac pacemaker for bradyarrhythmia management is one of the most commonly performed cardiac intervention. To study clinical profiles of patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation in India. 

Material and Methods: This was an observational Study. Patients, who received permanent pacemaker for bradyarrhythmias from 1st September 2012 to 30th May 2018, were included in the study .A detailed analysis of demographic profile, and indications was performed.

Results: Out of 312 patients, vast majority of patients were elderly; with the majority being in the 56-88 years age group (75%). Males received more pacemakers than females. Syncope was commonest presenting symptom and complete heart block was commonest ECG finding. Acquired A-V block was most common indication of pacing and Single chamber pacemaker (VVI/VVIR) was commonest mode of pacemaker.

Conclusion: Our study found that the major indications of pacemaker implantation were found to be acquired A-V block and SSS. Advanced age and male gender were associated with higher implantation rate.      

Keywords: Clinical Profile, Pacemaker & Bradyarrhythmias.

References

  1. Lopez-Jimenez F, Goldman L, Orav EJ, Ellenbogen K, StamblerB, Marinchak R, Wilkoff BL, Mangione CM, Yoon C, Vitale K, LamasGA. Health values before and after pacemaker implantation. Amer-ican Heart Journal. 2002;144(4):687-92.
  2. Brunner M, Olschewski M, Geibel A, Bode C, Zehender M.Long-term survival after pacemaker implantation: Prognostic importance of gender and baseline patient Characteristics. European Heart Journal. 2004; 25, 88–95.
  3. European Working Group on Cardiac Pacing. Cardiac pacing. European Heart Journal. 1987;8 (suppl F):212.
  4. Ray SG, Griffith MJ, Jamieson S, Bexton RS, Gold RG. Impact of the recommendations of the British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group on pacemaker prescription and on the immediate costs of pacing in the Northern region. British Heart Journal.1992;68:5314.
  5. Mayosi BM, Little F, Millar RN. Long-term survival after permanent pacemaker implantation in young adults: 30 year experience. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999; 22: 407-12.
  6. Brady PA, Shen WK, Neubauer SA, et al. Pacing mode and long-term survival in elderly patients with congestive heart failure: 1980-1985. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 1997; 1:193-201.
  7. Uslan DZ, Tleyjeh IM, Baddour LM, et al. Temporal trends in permanent pacemaker implantation: a population-based study. Am Heart J 2008; 155:896-903.
  8. Lone NA, Khan KA, Jalal S, Jan VM, Rather HA, Nazir S, et al. Clinicalprofile and outcome in patients with bifascicular block: The role of invasive electrophysiological study in planning treatment. Journal of Chinese Clinical Medicine 2010;5:19-25.
  9. Shaw DB, Holman RR, Gowers JI. Survival in sinoatrial disorder (sick sinus syndrome). Br Med J 1980;280:139-41.
  10. Levine SA, Miller H, Penton GB. Some clinical features of complete heart block. Circulation 1956;13:801-24.
  11. Rubenstein JJ, Schulman CL, Yurchak PM, DeSanctis RW. Clinical spectrum of the sick sinus syndrome. Circulation 1972;46:5-13.
  12. Jensen G, Sigurd B, Meibom J, Sandoe E. Adams-Stokes syndrome caused by paroxysmal third-degree atrioventricular block. Br Heart J I973;35:516-20.
  13. Sigurd B, Jensen G, Meibom J, Sandoe E. Adams-Stokes syndrome caused by sinoatrial block. Br Heart J 1973;35:1002-8.
  14. Sigurd B, Sandøe E. Management of Stokes-Adams syndrome. Cardiology 1990;77:195-208.
  15. Hart WJ. The neurological presentation of sick sinus syndrome. Can Fam Physician 1979;25:1233-41.
  16. Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, Estes NA 3rd, Freedman RA, Gettes LS, et al. American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; Heart Rhythm Society. 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 2013;127: e283-352.
  17. Movahed MR, Hashemzadeh M, Jamal MM. Increased prevalence of third-degree atrioventricular block in patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Chest 2005;128:2611-4.
  18. Chauhan A, Grace AA, Newell SA, Stone DL, Shapiro LM, Schofield PM, et al. Early complications after dual chamber versus single chamber pacemaker implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1994;17:2012-5

Corresponding Author

Dr Priyanka Kiyawat

Asst. Prof., Dept. of Pathology, MGM Medical College & M.Y. Hospital, Indore