Title: Role of Diagnostic Laparoscopy in Evaluation of Infertile Women -A Retrospective Study

Authors: Shanthi Ponnuswamy, Sasivannan Anbarasu, Iyanar Kannan

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i5.123

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study is to detect the role of diagnostic laparoscopy in detecting uterine, ovarian and pelvic pathologies in infertile women. It should be offered to all infertility cases who have completed a basic infertility evaluation for the female and male. It provides direct visualisation of the pelvic organs and more importantly the tubal status and patency[1]. Not only does this help in identification of unsuspected pelvic pathology but also contributes to decision making of infertility treatment.

Methods: This retropective study included 60 infertile women both primary and secondary, it was conducted at department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tagore medical college and hospital chennai, during the period between January 2013 to December 2017. After thorough gynecological examination, necessary investigations were made and written consent form was taken from them before laparoscopy. The patients were kept fasting for 24 hours before the laparoscopy and the procedure was performed under general anaesthesia. To test the patency of tubes, chromotubation was done in all cases under laparoscopic vision by using 10-15 ml of autoclaved methylene blue dye. All the data was collected on pre-designed proforma and the results were tabulated and raw percentages calculated to describe the results.

Results: Of sixty women studied, 41 (68%) had primary infertility while 19(32%) secondary infertility. Laparoscopy revealed normal findings in 6 (10%) with primary infertility and 3 (5%) with secondary infertility. The common finding was pelvic adhesion in 13(31%) and 8 (42%) of primary and secondary infertility respectively. Polycystic ovaries were detected in 11(26.8%) of primary infertility and 3 (15.7%) in secondary infertility. Endometriosis was found in 6(14.6%) with primary infertility and 3 (15.7%) in secondary infertility group. Fibroids were found in 4 (9.8%) and 2 (10.5%) in primary and secondary infertility respectively. Ovarian cyst detected in 5(12%) in primary infertility and 2(10.5%) in secondary infertility. Significant observation in this study was ovarian pathology commonly involved in primary infertility but tubal factors in secondary infertility.

Conclusion: Laparoscopy is safe and cost-effective method and should be considered as prime diagnostic tool for evaluating the etiology of infertility in women and for effective treatment decisions.

Keywords: Diagnostic laparoscopy, Primary infertility, Secondary infertility.

References

  1. Speroff L, Glass RH, Kase NG. Clinical gynecologic endocrinology & infertility. 6th edn. Chapter 27.Female Infertility. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 1999:1137-90.
  2. Shaheen R. Infections & Infertility. IJPD.2005;2(5):11-2.
  3. Howkins and Bourne. The pathology of conception. Shaw’s textbook of Gynaecology 13th edition. Elsevier 2004.
  4. Fartum M, Laufer N, Simon A. Investigations of infertile couple: Should diagnostic laparoscopy be performed after normal hysterosalpingography in treating infertility suspected to be of unknown origin? Hum Reprod 2002; 17:1-3. Comment in: Hum Reprod2002; 17:1928; author reply 1928-9.
  5. Mahmood S. An audit of diagnostic laparoscopies for infertility. J Surg Pak2003; 8:8-10.
  6. Tanahatoe SJ, Hompes PG, Lambalk CB. Investigations of infertile couple: should diagnostic laparoscopy be performed in the infertility workup program in patients undergoing intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod 2003; 18:8-11.
  7. Rutstein SO, Macro ORC, Shah IH. Infecundity, infertility, and childlessness in developingcountries.DHS Comparative Reports No 9. Calverton, Maryl and, USA: ORC Macro and the World Health Organization, 2004.
  8. Speroff L, Marc AF. Female infertility: Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility. 7th Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2005;1013-1068.
  9. Maheshwari A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S. Effect offemale age on the diagnostic categories of infertility. Hum Report 2008; 23:538-42.
  10. Moayeri, S.E. Lee,H.C. Lathi, R.B. Westphal, L.M. Milki, A.A. Garber, A.M. (2009): Laparoscopyin women with unexplained infertility: a cost-effective analysis. Fertil. Steril.92(2): 471-80.
  11. Wani QA, Ara R, Dangroo SA, Beig M. Diagnostic Laparoscopy in the Evaluation of Female Factors in Infertility in Kashmir Valley. Int J Women’s Health Reproduction Sci. 2014;2(2):48-57.
  12. Haider G, Rani S, Talpur S, Zehra N, Munir A. Laparoscopic evaluation of female Infertility. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2010;22(1)
  13. Talib W, Ikram M, Maimoona H, Saeed M. Infertile female; laparoscopic evaluation. Professional Med J2007; 14:562-6.
  14. Sinawat S, Pattamaadilok J, Seejorn K. Tubal abnormalities in Thai infertile females. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005;88(6): 723-7.

Corresponding Author

Dr Sasivannan Anbarasu

Department of General Surgery, Tagore Medical College and Hospital Rathinamangalam

Chennai – 600127, India

Mob: +91-9551167968, Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.