Title: Age Related Lesions of Prostate in Men above 40 Years. An Autopsy Study

Authors: Dr Prajitha P, Dr A. Sarath Kumar

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i5.115

Abstract

Introduction: Prostate enlargement occurs in elderly men due to two causes, benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatic carcinoma, which are sources of considerable morbidity and mortality. These two conditions are significant public health issues throughout the world. BPH is extremely common in men above 40years and its incidence is nearly 95% in men above 70 years. A rising incidence of microscopic foci of prostate cancer is found in men with increasing age. Results of autopsy studies have shown that almost 30% of men over the age of 50 have histological evidence of prostate cancer.

Materials and Methods: This study involved 50 prostate specimens obtained by autopsy and their histological analysis.

Results: The mean age in this study was 57.5years. Non neoplastic lesions studied were benign prostatic hyperplasia, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, chronic prostatitis.

Premalignant lesions were low grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and high prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

The incidence of latent carcinoma was 12%.

Conclusion:  The lesions categorised in our study were non neoplastic, premalignant, and carcinoma. Non neoplastic lesions included  benign prostatic hyperplasia, chronic prostatitis, basal cell hyperplasia, and atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, The incidence of was  BPH (74%), basal cell hyperplasia (6%), atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (10%), and Chronic prostatitis was seen in  ( 24%), low grade PIN (24%), high grade PIN ( 8%) in the total 50 specimens. The incidence of carcinoma is 12%.

Keywords: prostate, autopsy, histoprostate,autopsy,histoathology, age, non neoplastic, neoplastic, premalignant,latent.

References

  1. Crawford ED. Epidemiology of prostate cancer. Urology. 2003;62(6 suppl 1):3–12. [PubMed]
  2. Grignon DJ. Unusual subtypes of prostate cancer. Mod Pathol. 2004; 17(3):316-327 Scardino FT
  3. Early detection of prostate cancer. UrolClin North Am. 1989;16:635–655. [PubMed]
  4. Carter HB, Piantadosi S, Isaacs JT. Clinical evidence for and implications of the multistep development of prostate cancer. J Urol. 1990;143:742–746.
  5. Scher HI, Isaacs JT, Zelefsky MJ, et al. Prostate cancer. In: Abeloff MD, Armitage JO, Lichter AS, et al., editors. Clinical Oncology. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. pp. 1823–1884.
  6. Wiklund, E. M. Gillanders, J. A. Albertus, A. Bergh, J. E. Damber, M. Emanuelsson, D. L.Freas-Lutz, D. E. Gildea, I. Goransson, M. S. Jones, B. A. Jonsson, F. Lindmark, C. J. Markey, E. L. Riedesel, E. Stenman, J. M. Trent, H. Gronberg, Genome-wide scan of Swedish families with hereditary prostate cancer: suggestive evidence of linkage at 5q11.2 and 19p13.3, Prostate 57 (2003) 290-297.
  7. Bratt, U. Kristoffersson, R. Lundgren, H. Olsson, Familial and hereditary prostate cancer in southern Sweden. A population-based case-control study, Eur J Cancer 35 (1999) 272-277
  8. Trpkov C1, Yilmaz A2, Trpkov Perineural invasion in prostate cancer patients who are potential candidates for active surveillance: validation study
  9. Roehrborn C, McConnell JWalsh P, Retik A, Vaughan E, Wein A, editors. Etiology, pathophysiology, epidemiology and natural history of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Campbell’s Urology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2002. pp. 1297–1336.)
  10. Barry MJ, Fowler FJ Jr, Bin L, Pitts JC 3rd, Harris CJ, Mulley AG Jr J ,The natural history of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia as diagnosed by North American urologists. Urol. 1997 Jan; 157(1):10-4; discussion 14-5.[PubMed]
  11. Bostwick, David G. M.D.; Qian, Junqui M.D, Atypical Adenomatous Hyperplasia of the Prostate: Relationship with Carcinoma in 217 Whole-mount Radical Prostatectomies.

Corresponding Author

Dr A. Sarath Kumar

Additional Professor, Dept of Pathology

Govt. Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram