Title: Study of Proximal femoral Anthropometry in Population of Eastern Madhya Pradesh

Authors: Harsh Kumar Chawre, Arjun Singh Parmar, P. G. Khanwalkar

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i4.191

Abstract

Introduction: The femur is the longest and strongest bone in the human body. It has a proximal rounded, articular head projecting medially from its short neck, which, in turn, is a medial extension of the proximal shaft. 

Material & Method: One hundred twenty (120) dry femurs human Indian cadavers without any pathology obtained from the Department of Anatomy were utilised for this study. Femoral head diameter (FHD), Horizontal offset (HO), Neck shaft angle (NSA) and Femoral Neck Thickness (FNT) were measured.

Results: There was a significant difference between right and left side of femoral head diameter, femoral neck thickness, neck shaft angle and horizontal offset. The average femoral head diameter for the entire sample was 45 mm, average femoral neck thickness was 27.7 mm, average neck shaft angle was 1280 and average horizontal offset was 39.8 mm.

Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that marked differences do exist in the dimensions between the femur of the Indian population and that of the populations of other regions of the world. For Indian population best fit prosthesis can be made with the help of the published data of proximal femur. 

Keywords: Femoral head diameter (FHD), Horizontal offset (HO), Neck shaft angle (NSA) and Femoral Neck Thickness (FNT) were measured.

References

  1. Pelvic Girdle, Gluteal region & Thigh, Standrings S, Borley NR, Collins P, eds. In: Gray’s Anatomy 40th Edinburgh: Churchill Living stone Elsevier; 2008: 1360 – 1365.
  2. The Lower Limb, Richard S. Snell,eds. In: Clinical Anatomy by Regions. 9th Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012: 439 – 444.
  3. Lower limb, Chummy S. Sinnatamby, eds. In: Lasts Anatomy Regions And Applied 10th ed: Churchill Living stone Elsevier; 2011: 169 – 171.
  4. Verma M, Joshi S, Raheja S, et al. Morphometry of Proximal Femur in Indian Population, Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2017 Feb, Vol-11(2): AC01-AC04.
  5. Ravichandran D, Muthukumaravel N, Jaikumar R, et al. Proximal Femoral Geometry in Indians and its Clinical Applications., J. Anat. Soc. India 60 (1) 6 – 12, 2011.
  6. Roy S, Kundu R, Medda S, et al. Evolution of Proximal Femoral Geometry in Plain Anterior – Posterior radiograph in Eastern – Indian Population. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2014: Vol – 8 (9): AC01 – AC03.
  7. Pathrot D, Haq R U, Aggarwal A N, et al. Assessment of the geometry of proximal femur for short cephalo medullary nail placement an observational study in dry femora and living subjects, Indian journal of Orthopaedics. 2016: Vol – 50 (3): 269 – 276.
  8. Boese C K, Frink M, Jostmeier J, et al. The modified Femoral Neck Shaft Angle: Age and Sex dependent Refrence values and Reliability Analysis. BioMed Research International. 2016: 01 – 07.
  9. Jiang N, Peng L, Al – Qwbani M, et al. Femoral version, Neck – shaft Angle, and Acetabular Anteversion in Chinese Han Population. Medicine 2015: Vol–94: 01 – 09.
  10. Gillian I, Chandraphak S, Mahakka-nukrauh. Femoral Neck Shaft Angle in Humans: variations relating to climate, clothing, Lifestyle, sex, age and side. Journal of Anatomy. 2013: 133 – 151.
  11. Rawal B.R, Rebeiro R, Malhotra R, et al. Anthropometric measurement to design best fit femoral stem for the Indian population. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2016: Vol – 46 (1); 47 – 53.
  12. Sendhoorani, Doraiswamy R, Mithrason A T, A study on the proximal femoral geometry for standardizing the femoral component design to suit Indian needs in total hip replacement. International Journal of Anatomy and Research 2016: Vol – 4 (2); 2416 – 22.

Corresponding Author

Arjun Singh Parmar

F – 11/2, New Doctors Colony, Arjun Nagar Rewa. MP – 48600 India