Title: DNR Odontoscripting : Psychosocial Forensic Implication

Authors: Dr Afzal Ahma, Dr Md Mojahid Anwar, Dr Asma Usmani, Hena Fatima, Prof Munawwar Husain

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i4.163

Abstract

Nowadays a raging controversy has arisen regarding “do not resuscitate” (DNR) will in unconventional methods. It has been reported that a person had brought DNR etching over his chest in the form of tattoo. One day, as luck would have been, he collapsed and was carried to ER section of the hospital. The person was unconscious and to give CPR and defibrillation his chest was laid bare. The doctor came across the DNR message over his chest and a controversy arose within the treating group of doctors. Few were in favour of giving CPR while others were against it. The protagonist accepted tattoo as a living will. Now even the courts have categorically stated that a living will in this regard should be accepted as a final say of the patient. In the present article the discussion is further carried forward emphasizing on reliability and durability of DNR bodily message.

Keywords: Odontoscript, Tattoo, Living Will, DNR Order, Post mortem Decay.

References

  1. Holt GE, Sarmento B, Kett D, Goodman KW: An unconscious patient with a DNR tattoo. N Emgl J Med, 2017; 377: 2192-2193
  2. Salins NS, Pai SG, Vidyasagar MS, Sobhana M: Ethics and Medico Legal Aspects of “Not for Resuscitation”. Ind J Palliative Care, 2010; 16(2): 66-69
  3. Sheykholeslam, Z., Buonocore, M. G.: "Bonding of Resinsto Phosphoric Acid-Etched Enamel Surfaces of Permanent and Deciduous Teeth,".  Dent Res, 1972; 51:1572-1575

Corresponding Author

Dr Md Mojahid Anwar

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Mobile No: +91 8791872168