Title: Spinal anesthesia at L2-3 vs L3-4 levels: comparison of onset of block, maximum level of block and hemodynamic response in obstetric patients undergoing caesarian section
Authors: Shahzada G, S. Wajahat Andrabi, Shaiq H, Malla Sadiq M
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i4.140
Abstract
Background and Aims: Today intrathecal anaesthesia is used for almost any procedure below umbilicus. The present study evaluated Spinal anesthesia at L2-3 vs L3-4 levels with comparison of onset of block, maximum level of block and hemodynamic response in obstetric patients undergoing caesarian section.
Methodology: The study was conducted on seventy patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade I and II of age group 18–37 years, allocated to one of the two groups of thirty five patients each. Group I received spinal anaesthesia at L2-L3 and Group II received spinal anaesthesia at L3-L4. Patients were monitored for onset of sensory and motor block, total duration of sensory block, level of sensory block, intraoperative haemodynamic characteristics and VAS score.
Results: Demographic variables were comparable. The onset times of sensory and motor block were significantly shorter in group I (7.10±1.40), (9.45±1.30) than group II (9.50±1.30), (13.00±1.20). There was a significant difference between the two groups in achieving the height of sensory block in the first 30 minutes after intrathecal injection (p<0.001). The median height of the sensory block for patients in group I was T8 whereas in group II, it was T9. The incidence of hypotension showed no statistical difference (p>0.05) between the two groups. The severity of intra operative pain, estimated using a 10 cm VAS, was significantly higher (p=0.038) in group I than in the group II at the beginning of the caesarean section while in the later course of the surgery no statistical difference was found.
Conclusion: Intrathecal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine administered in L2–3 interspace for caesarean section provides superior analgesia, significantly earlier onset of sensory and motor block and equal hemodynamic stability as compared to spinal anaesthesia administered in the L3–4 interspace.
Keywords: Intrathecal anaesthesia, spinal, analgesia, hypotension, bradycardia, caesarean section.
References
- Wheatley RG, Schug SA, Watson D. Safety and efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 2001 Jul;87(1):47–61.
- Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, McKee A, Kehlet H, van Zundert A, et al. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ. 2000 Dec 16;321(7275):1493.
- Macfarlane AJR, Prasad GA, Chan VWS, Brull R. Does regional anesthesia improve outcome after total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop. 2009 Sep;467(9):2379–402.
- Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Lee BB, Lau TK, Gin T. A doseresponse study of prophylactic intravenous ephedrine for the prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 1390-5.
- Tercanli S, Schneider M, Visca E, Hösli I, Troeger C, Peukert R et al. Infl uence of volume preloading on uteroplacental and fetal circulation during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section in uncomplicated singleton pregnancies. Fetal Diagn Th er 2002;17:142-6.
- Cesur M, Alici HA, Erdem AF, Borekci B, Silbir F. Spinal anesthesia with sequential administration of plain and hyperbaric bupivacaine provides satisfactory analgesia with hemodynamic stability in cesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2008; 17: 217-22.
- Russell I. Many recipes for the same dish: can minor modifi cation cause major improvement? Int J Obstet Anesth 2008; 17: 208-11.
- Ngan Kee WD. Prevention of maternal hypotension aft er regional anaesthesia for caesarean section. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2010; 23: 304.
- Kestin I G. Spinal anaesthesia in obstetrics. Br J Anaesth 1991; 66: 596-607.
- Juhani TP, Hannele H. Complications during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery: a clinical report of one year's experience. Reg Anesth1993; 18:128-31.
- Gautier, M. De Kock, L. Huberty, T. Demir, M. Izy- dorczic and B. Vanderick, “Comparison of the Effects of İntrathecal Ropivacaine, Levobupivacaine and Bupiva- caine for Caesarean Section,” British Journal of Anaes- thesia, Vol. 91, No. 5, 2003, pp. 684-689.
- Ngan Kee WD. Prevention of maternal hypotension after regional anaesthesia for caesarean section. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2010 Jun;23(3):304-9.