Title: Evaluation of Socio-demographic features along with Clinical and laboratory findings in patients with Hydatid disease: A study in tertiary care hospital in Central India

Authors: Aksharaditya Shukla, Ashok Panchonia, Khusbu Likhar, Aseem Rangnekar

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i4.130

Abstract

Introduction: The hydatid cyst is a zoonosis caused by adult or larval stages of tape worms belonging to the genus Echinococcus. Hydatid disease has wide geographic distribution and is considered a public health problem. Diagnosis and treatment of Hydatid disease mandates thorough clinical and diagnostic work-up.

Material and Methods:  A retrospective study undertaken at the department of Pathology in a Tertiary care Government hospital and Medical College in Central India. Socio-demographic data from a total 34 cases of hydatid disease were collected. Detailed clinical history, laboratory findings and histopathological evaluation by H & E stained slides was done for confirming the diagnosis.  The data was entered in Microsoft Excel and proportions were calculated

Results: Out of 34 cases, liver was involved in 30 cases. After liver, lung is most commonly affected site showing involvement in 4 cases. Most of the patients were of 41-50 years of age. Average cyst size is 13.5 cm. Incidence of hydatid disease is more in male as compared to female with ratio of about 2.5:1. Most of the cases were found having animals at home or live in close association with animals. We found that 57.6% of symptomatic and 62.5% of asymptomatic patients had elevated Eosinophil counts.

Conclusion: Hydatid cyst can involve any part of the body and patients are may be asymptomatic or present with nonspecific symptoms. Complete diagnostic work-up including detailed clinical history, specific information about animal contact, radiological examination and complete blood counts to look for Eosinophilia and confirmatory histopathology is of utmost importance.

References

  1. Eckert J, Deplazes P. Biological, epidemiological, and clinical aspects of echinococcosis, a zoonosis of increasing concern. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;17: 107–35.
  2. Eroğlu A, Atabekoğlu S, Kocaoğlu H. Primary hydatid cyst of the neck. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol.1999;256:202–4. 
  3. Mathur PN, Parihar S, Joshi CP, Kumawat JL. Hydatid disease-still endemic in the southern region of state of Rajasthan , India : a clinical study carried out in tertiary care hospital. Int Surg J. 2016;3(4):1802–5.
  4. Kireşi DA, Karabacakoğlu A, Odev K, Karaköse S. Uncommon locations of hydatid cysts. Acta Radiol.2003;44:622–36. 
  5. Polat P, Kantarci M, Alper F, Suma S, Koruyucu MB, Okur A. Hydatid disease from head to toe. Radiographics. 2003;23:475–94. 
  6. Gangopadhyay K, Abuzeid MO, Kfoury H. Hydatid cyst of the pterygopalatine-infratemporal fossa. J Laryngol Otol. 1996; 110:978–80. 
  7. Ozturk, Serdar Hydatid cyst in the soft tissue of the face without any primary. Ann Plast Surg.2001;46:170–3. 
  8. Michail OP, Georgiou C, Michail PO, Felekouras E, Karavokyros I, Marinos G, Giannopoulos A, Griniatsos J. Disappe-arance of recurrent intra-abdominal extrahepatic hydatid cyst following oral albendazole administration. West Indian Med J 2007; 56(4):16-21.
  9. Akal M, Kera M. Primary hydatid cyst of the posterior cervical triangle. J Laryngol Otol 2002; 116:153-155.
  10. Aletras H, Symbas N: Hydatid disease of the lung. In General Thoracic Surgery. 5th edition. Edited by ShieldsTW, LoCicero J, Ponn RB. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2000:1113–1122.
  11. Khanna V, Tilak K, Mukhopadhyay C, Khanna R. Significance of diagnosing parasitic infestation in evaluation of unexplained eosinophilia. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2015;9(7):DC22-DC24.

Corresponding Author

Aseem Rangnekar