Title: Prevalence of Different Types of Urinary Incontinence and their Association with Age and Parity

Authors: Dr Abha Choudhary, Dr Ruchita Dadhich

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i4.128

Abstract

Introduction: Urinary incontinence (UI) is one of the most common diseases in the world, occurring majorly in females. One out of five women in the world suffers from disease. Based on pathophysiology urinary incontinence is divided into 3 types: stress urinary incontinence, urge urinary incontinence and mixed urinary incontinence.

Material and Method: It is a cross sectional study. It was conducted at Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose medical college and hospital from October 2016 to October 2017. A total of 418 women above 18 years of age who have none of the exclusion criteria (active UTI, pregnancy and 6 weeks postpartum, malignancy, any neurological illness, all patients with true illness) were included.

Result: Stress urinary incontinence had highest prevalence of in our study, followed by mixed urinary incontinence and urge urinary incontinence. The prevalence of urinary incontinence is much higher in older age groups (above 40 yr). In young women the prevalence of urinary incontinence is usually low, but prevalence peaks around menopause, with a steady rise thereafter in later life.  In our study all the primipara were found to be continent. The prevalence of urinary incontinence increases with increasing parity.

Conclusion: As people are living longer and the number of elderly keeps increasing, urinary incontinence becomes a very significant problem. Urinary incontinence has an impact on the quality of life and affects productivity and decreases activity levels in women.

Keywords: Urinary incontinence, stress urinary incontinence, urge urinary incontinence, mixed urinary incontinence, parity.

References

  1. Hunskar S, Lose G, Sykes D, Voss S. The prevalence of urinary incontinence in women in four European countries. BJU Int 2004;93:324-30
  2. Diokno AC, Estanol MV, Mallett V. Epidemiology of lower urinary tract dysfunction. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2004;47:36-43
  3. Thom D. Variation in estimates of urinary incontinence prevalence in the community: effects of differences in definition, population characteristics, and study type. J Am Geriatr Soc 1988;46:473-80
  4. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standerdisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standerdisation Subcommittee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 2002;21:167-78
  5. Uma singh et al. prevalence and ris factor of UI in Indian women ; a hospital based survey   Indian journal urol 2013jan ;29(1); 31-6
  6. Hannested YS,Rortveit G, Hunskaar S, help seeking and associated factors in female urinary incontinence.the Norwegian EPINCONT study Scand J Prim health care 2002;20102-7
  7. Hagglund D et al. urinary incontinence: an unexpected large problem among young females. Results from a population based study. Fam pract 1999;16;506-9
  8. Hannested YS,Rortveit G, Hunskaar S, help seeking and associated factors in female urinary incontinence,Scand J Prim health care 2002;20102-7
  9. Yarnell JW,etal. The prevalence and severity of UI in women . J epidemiol community health, 1981;35 71-4
  10. Singh Abha et al . incidence and epidemiology of UI in women obstet gynecol India vol57 no 2 march /april 2007(155-157)
  11. Brown JS et al. hysterectomy and urinary incontinence . a systemicreview lancet, 2000;356;535-9
  12. Dr jahnavi Esanakula et al ( may 2015) gynecological symptoms in apparently asymptomatic women p issn; 2279-0861
  13. Sommer P,BauerT et al . voiding patterns and prevalence ofincontinence in women . Br J Urol 1990;66;12-5
  14. Kinchen KS ,Burgio K et al. factors associated with women’s decisionto seek treatment for UI . J women’s health(Larchmt)2003;12;687-98
  15. Chiarelli P,Brown W; prevalence and associated factors in Australian women. Neurourol Urodynamic 1999;18;567-77
  16. Danforth K N et al (2006). Risk factor for urinary incontinence among middle aged women. Am JObstet Gynecol ,194(2)339-345
  17. Victor W Nitti etal . review in urology , the prevalence of urinary incontinence . department of urology, New York University school of medicine, new York

Corresponding Author

Dr Ruchita Dadhich

124 Gokul Dham, Janata Colony, Near Mahesh Tent House,

Deoli Distt Tonk, Rajasthan. India

Mobile no: 9575788064, Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.