Details
Category: Volume 06 Issue 04 April 2018
Hits: 1454

Title: Estimation of Various Measurements of Hyoid Bone and its Co-Relation with sex of the Individual– An Autopsy Study

Authors: Dr Thippesh Kumar N, Dr Abhijit Rudra

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i4.107

Abstract

Establishing the Identity of a person is one of the biggest challenges faced by forensic pathologist in cases where the body has either decomposed or has been mutilated by the perpetrator of a crime. Without the establishment of the identity of the body the investigation cannot proceeds further. When a mutilated or decomposed body have been recovered then the Identification of the individual can be done in a step by step approach, in that identification of sex is one of the most important steps. Sex can be established by various methods. Determination of the sex by bones is one of the important steps when a bag of bones have been recovered. Most bones are used to identify the sex of the unidentified bag of bones. Most of the bones shows sexual dimorphism and various studies have been conducted using various bones. In the present study we have used Hyoid bone for correlating the bone with the of sex of the individual. In this study 116 hyoids were studied which were collected from the autopsies conducted at the mortuary of a Medical College in Western Maharashtra. The collected hyoids had 58 Males and 58 Females. The minimum age of the subjects was 20yrs and the maximum age was 80yrs. Present study was able to establish the sexual dimorphism of the hyoid bone with respect to the five parameters measured. In the present study the discriminant function analysis developed using all the five variables showed 91.4% accuracy in classifying male hyoids correctly and 100% accuracy in classification of female hyoids. This discriminant function can be used for determination of sex of the recovered hyoid bone.

Keywords: Hyoid bone, Sex determination, Discriminate Function, co-relation.

References

  1. Agrwal A. Text Book of forensic medicine and toxicology. Avichal Publishing Company;2016.
  2. Knight B, Saukko PJ. Knight's forensic pathology: 3rd edition: Arnold London; 2004. .
  3. Dr OP Murthy, Dr KSNarayana Reddy. The Essentials of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology: 33rd Edition: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2015.
  4. Mukhopadhyay PP. Determination of sex from an autopsy sample of adult hyoid bones. Medicine, Science and the Law. 2012; 52: 152-5.
  5. Siegel JA SP. Encyclopedia of forensic sciences: Academic Press; 2012.
  6. Priya K and Ranzeetha D. Determination of sex from morphometry of hyoid bone. Indian Journal of Clinical Anatomy and Physiology. 2015; 2: 157-61.
  7. Rogers TL. Determining the sex of human remains through cranial morphology. Journal of Forensic Science. 2005;50: 1-8.
  8. Standring S. Gray's anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2015.
  9. D’Souza DH, Kiran J and Harish SS. Determination of sex by shape and size of hyoid bone. Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine. 2013; 35: 145-7.
  10. Hak SAGE, Dakroory SAE, Hawary AAE and Alghazally AM. Sexual Dimorphism of The Hyoid Bone. A Preliminary Study. Mansoura Journal Of Forensic Medicine Clinical Toxicology. 2007; 15:17-30.
  11. Amrutha Roopa Ramagalla DPS, Dr.T K Rajashree. Morphometry of human hyoid bone for sex determination. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS). 2014; 13: 4.
  12. I HaJ. Shape, Size and Sexual dimorphism of the hyoid bone in Northwest Indians. Journal of Anatomical Society of India. 1996; 45: 19.
  13. D'Souza DH, Kiran J and Harish SS. Determination of sex by shape and size of hyoid bone. Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine. 2013; 35: 145-7.
  14. Leksan I, Marcikic M, Nikolic V, Radic R and Selthofer R. Morphological classification and sexual dimorphism of hyoid bone: new approach. Collegium antropologicum. 2005; 29: 237-42.
  15. Kothapalli DDVSP. Sexual Dimorphism OF Hyoid Bone. Journal of Bioscience And Technology. 2015; 6: 5.
  16. Mukhopadhyay PP. Morphometric features and sexual dimorphism of adult hyoid bone: a population specific study with forensic implications. Journal of forensic and legal medicine. 2010; 17: 321-4.
  17. Pollard J, Piercecchi-Marti M-D, Thollon L, et al. Mechanisms of hyoid bone fracture after modelling: evaluation of anthropological criteria defining two relevant models. Forensic science international. 2011; 212: 274. e1-. e5.
  18. Kim DI, Lee U, Park DK, et al. Morphometrics of the hyoid bone for human sex determination from digital photographs. Journal of forensic sciences. 2006; 51: 979-84.
  19. Kindschuh SC, Dupras TL and Cowgill LW. Determination of sex from the hyoid bone. American journal of physical anthropology. 2010; 143: 279-84.
  20. Urbanová P, Hejna P, Zátopková L and Šafr M. What is the appropriate approach in sex determination of hyoid bones? Journal of forensic and legal medicine. 2013; 20: 996-1003.
  21. Miller KW, Walker PL and O'Halloran RL. Age and sex-related variation in hyoid bone morphology. Journal of Forensic Science. 1998; 43: 1138-43.
  22. Ubelaker DH and Pollanen MS. Forensic significance of the polymorphism of hyoid bone shape. Journal of Forensic Science. 1997; 42: 890-2.
  23. ITO K, ANDO S, AKIBA N, et al. Morphological study of the human hyoid bone with three-dimensional CT images—Gender difference and age-related changes—. Okajimas folia anatomica Japonica. 2012; 89: 83-92.
  24. Reesink E, Van Immerseel A, Brand R and Bruintjes TD. Sexual dimorphism of the hyoid bone? International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. 1999; 9: 357-60.

Corresponding Author

Dr Thippesh Kumar N

Dept of Forensic Medicine, Golden Jubilee Block,

Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, Maharshtara (State) Pin -411040

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.