Title: Prospective Comparative Analysis of Platelets Rich Plasma vs Steroid in Tennis Elbow at Tertiary Heath Care Center- Index Medical College, Indore

Authors: Dr Ravindra Gupta, (M.S.), Dr Vinay Tantuway (M.S.)

 DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i4.80

Abstract

Introduction: This study is to compare results of inj steroid and inj PRP in tennis elbow condition locally. People that requires repetitive supinaton & pronation of forearm with elbow in near full extension are more predisposed to develop this condition. It was originally described as inflammatory process but current consensus is that tennis elbow is initiated as multiple micro tear most often within the origin of the ECRBCAMP 13TH 2599. Corticosteroid injection have anti-inflammatory pontential whereas PRP injection have regenerative capacity.

Materials and Method: All patients were taken from OPD of index medical college, Indore. Duration was from January 2017 to March 2018. It was a prospective study. After patient selection by inclusion and exclusion criteria PRP or steroid injections were given on OPD basis. Full informed consent was taken prior to participate in study. Before putting patients in steroid group or PRP group everything has been explained to patients about procedure including charges. Patient chose group themselves by their own choices.

Total of 70 patients were investigated and diagnosed having tennis elbow. 38 patients chose for local steroid injection and 32 patients opted for PRP injection.

Results and Discussion: Our study shows that PRP injection is much better & safer option than steroid injection in terms of pain improvement and functional outcome. The probable reason may be as has been described in introduction TENNIS ELBOW is an degenerative process rather than an inflammatory process. Steroid acts as an anti-inflammatory substance and PRP is a regenerative material. So PRP works properly against the pathology and gives long term results.

Conclusion: In conclusion, local injection of autologous PRP as compared to local steroid injection appeared to be a promising form of therapy for tennis elbow. It is both safe (prepared from autologous blood) and effective in relieving pain and improving function. PRP therapy is much costlier than steroid injection but in long term it is fount to b cost effective (less requirement of future intervention). The current available data support that repeated steroid injections are deleterious and may lead to serious consequences even tendon rupture. However sustained efficacy of this therapy should be further evaluated in long-term follow-up studies that include a larger number of patients.

Keywords: PRP injection, steroid injection, Tennis elbow.

References

  1. Du Toit, C; Stieler, M; Saunders, R; Bisset, L; Vicenzino, B (2008). "Diagnostic accuracy of power Doppler ultrasound in patients with chronic tennis elbow". British Journal of Sports Medicine. 42 (11): 572–576.  doi:1136/bjsm.2007.043901ISSN 0306-3674.
  2. Jump up^Nirschl RP (October 1992). "Elbow tendinosis/tennis elbow". Clin Sports Med. 11 (4): 851–70. PMID 1423702.
  3. Weibrich G, Kleis WK, Hafner G, et al.. Growth factor levels in platelet-rich plasma and correlations with donor age, sex, and platelet count. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2002; 30:97–102.
  4. Landesberg R, Roy M, Glickman RS. Quantification of growth factor levels using a simplified method of platelet-rich plasma gel preparation. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2000; 58:297–300.
  5. Edwards SG, Calandruccio JH. Autologous blood injections for refractory lateral epicondylitis. J Hand Surg. 2003; 28:272–278.
  6. Bhanot S, Alex JC. Current applications of platelet gels in facial plastic surgery. Facial Plast Surg. 2002; 18:27–34.
  7. Geaney LE, Arciero RA, DeBerardino TM, et al.. The effects of platelet-rich plasma on tendon and ligament: basic science and clinical application. Op Techn Sports Med. 2011; 19:160–164.
  8. Eppley BL, Woodell JE, Higgins J. Platelet quantification and growth factor analysis from platelet-rich plasma: implications for wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 114:1502–1508.
  9. Everts PA, Knape JT, Weibrich G, et al.. Platelet-rich plasma and platelet gel: a review. J Extracorp Tech. 2006; 38:174.
  10. Mishra A, Woodall J, Vieira A. Treatment of tendon and muscle using platelet-rich plasma. Clin Sports Med. 2009; 28:113–125.
  11. Connell DA, Ali KE, Ahmad M, et al.. Ultrasound-guided autologous blood injection for tennis elbow. Skeletal Radiol. 2006; 35:371–377.
  12. Gani N, Butt MF, Dhar SA, et al.. Blood injection in the treatment of refractory tennis elbow. Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery. 2007; 6(4):5473.
  13. Bisset L, Beller E, Jull G, et al.. Mobilisation with movement and exercise, corticosteroid injection, or wait and see for tennis elbow: randomised trial. BMJ. 2006; 333:939.

Corresponding Author

Dr Ravindra Gupta (M.S.)

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.